Specifications Manual for Joint Commission National Quality Measures (v2027A)
Posted: 8/7/2026

Release Notes:
Release Notes
Version 2027A

This page does not need to be edited for each new release. The list of release notes is automatically generated based on the release identified in url param.

Select Release:

Release Notes for the 2027A Manual

Measure Information Forms

SectionRationaleDescription
CCCIP-01 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
The 2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults recommends that “high-intensity statin therapy should be initiated or continued as first-line therapy in women and men ≤75 years of age who have clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), unless contraindicated” (individualized treatment for patients over 75 years old is recommended). Despite this Class I, Level A guideline recommendation and that statins have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality (Jneid et al., 2017), only 23% of AMI patients are discharged on maximal statin therapy (Arnold et al., 2014). Prescribing rates are also low for patients with acute coronary syndromes. A 2010 study found that only 38.3% of these patients are discharged with intensive lipid-lowering therapy (Javed et al., 2014).

To:
Statins are the first-line therapy for treating hyperlipidemia and preventing or reducing heart disease in both men and women. The 2026 ACC/AHA Guidelines on the Management of Dyslipidemia recommend high-intensity statin therapy for most adults with ASCVD to “achieve >/= to 50% reduction in LDL-C and goal of less than 70 mg/dL…”, (Blumenthal, R.S., et al., 2026). Despite this Class I, Level A guideline recommendation and that statins have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality (Jneid et al., 2017), only 23% of AMI patients are discharged on maximal statin therapy (Arnold et al., 2014). Prescribing rates are also low for patients with acute coronary syndromes. A 2010 study found that only 38.3% of these patients are discharged with intensive lipid-lowering therapy (Javed et al., 2014). Although prescribing practices have increased significantly from 461 million to 818 million (77%; p = 0.000) between 2008 and 2019, high-intensity statin prescribing trends remain suboptimal at approximately 30%, (Matyori, A., et al., 2023).

Selected References
Remove:
  • Arnold, J., Acharya, D., Boricha, H., Chapagain, H., Kainat, A., McTigue, K.M., et al. (2025). Real-World Prescribing in Accordance to ACC/AHA Guidelines for Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Primary and Secondary Prevention of ASCVD: Real-World Prescribing for Lipid-Lowering Therapy. American Journal of Preventive Cardiology. Sept;(23),101067:1-10.
  • Arnold, S., Kosiborod, M., Tang, F., Zhao, Z., Maddox, T. McCollam, P., et al. (2014). Patterns of Statin Initiation, Intensification, and Maximization Among Patients Hospitalized with an Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2014 March 25; 129(12): 1303–1309.
  • Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, American Society for Preventive Cardiology, American Society of Hypertension, Association of Black Cardiologists, National Lipid Association, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, and Women Heart: The National Coalition for Women with Heart Disease. (2014). 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 63(25 0 0), 2935–2959.
  • Javed, U., Deedwania, P., Bhatt, D., Cannon, C., Dai, D., Hernandez, A., et al. (2010). Use of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome: An analysis of 65,396 hospitalizations from 344 hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines (GWTG). Am Heart J.160(6):1130-6, 1136.e1-3
  • Jneid, H., Addison, D., Bhatt, D., Fonarow, G., Gokak, S., Grady, K., et. al. (2017). 2017 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 17;70(16):2048-2090.
  • Rao, S.V., O’Donoghue, M.L., Ruel, M., Rab, T., Tamis-Holland, J.E., Williams, M.S., et al. (2025). 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. JACC. June 10;85(22):2165-2168.

Original Performance Measure Source / Developer: Jneid, H., Addison, D., Bhatt, D., Fonarow, G., Gokak, S., Grady, K. et.al. (2017). 2017 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults with ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. J Am Coll Cardiol. Oct 17;70(16):2048-2090.

Add:
  • American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. (2014). 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 63 (25 Pt B), 2935–2959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.005
  • Arnold, J., Acharya, D., Boricha, H., Chapagain, H., Kainat, A., McTigue, K. M., et al. (2025). Real-world prescribing in accordance with ACC/AHA guidelines for lipid-lowering therapy in primary and secondary prevention of ASCVD. American Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 23, 101067, 1–10.
  • Arnold, S. V., Kosiborod, M., Tang, F., Zhao, Z., Maddox, T. M., McCollam, P. L., et al. (2014). Patterns of statin initiation, intensification, and maximization among patients hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction. Circulation, 129 (12), 1303–1309. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002880
  • Blumenthal, R. S., Morris, P. B., Gaudino, M., Johnson, H. M., Anderson, T. S., Bittner, V. A., Blankstein, R., Brewer, L. C., Cho, L., de Ferranti, S. D., Gianos, E., Gluckman, T. J., Gradney, K. F., Isiadinso, I., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Marrs, J. C., Martin, S. S., McLain, K. H., Mehta, L. S., Mora, S., Mulugeta, W. M., Natarajan, P., Navar, A. M., Orringer, C. E., Polonsky, T. S., Reynolds, H. R., Saseen, J. J., Shapiro, M. D., Soffer, D. E., Tynes, S. A., Villavaso, C. D., Virani, S. S., & Wilkins, J. T. (2026). 2026 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of dyslipidemia: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.11.016
  • Javed, U., Deedwania, P., Bhatt, D. L., Cannon, C. P., Dai, D., Hernandez, A. F., et al. (2010). Use of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome: An analysis of 65,396 hospitalizations from 344 hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines (GWTG). American Heart Journal, 160 (6), 1130–1136.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.08.026
  • Jneid, H., Addison, D., Bhatt, D. L., Fonarow, G. C., Gokak, S., Grady, K. L., et al. (2017). 2017 AHA/ACC clinical performance and quality measures for adults with ST-elevation and non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 70 (16), 2048–2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.032
  • Matyori, A., Brown, C. P., Ali, A., & Sherbeny, F. (2023). Statins utilization trends and expenditures in the U.S. before and after the implementation of the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 31 (6), 795–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2023.04.002
  • Rao, S. V., O’Donoghue, M. L., Ruel, M., Rab, T., Tamis-Holland, J. E., Williams, M. S., et al. (2025). 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 85 (22), 2165–2168.
CCCIP-02 The measure rationale was updated to align with GWTG-HF April 2026 Release Notes and include patients with serum potassium values less than or equal to 5.0 mEq/L. Selected references were formatted in APA 7th Edition style. Rationale

Change from:

The 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure states a benefit of prescribing Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists across the spectrum of HFrEF, inclusive of a wide range of etiologies and disease severities. An MRA (spironolactone or eplerenone) is recommended in patients with HFrEF and NYHA class II to IV symptoms to reduce morbidity and mortality, if eGFR is >30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and serum potassium is <5.0 mEq/L. Hyperkalemia is a major risk of MRA therapy; therefore, careful monitoring of potassium, renal function, and diuretic dosing should be performed at initiation and closely monitored thereafter (Heidenreich et al., 2022).

To:

The 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure states a benefit of prescribing Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists across the spectrum of HFrEF, inclusive of a wide range of etiologies and disease severities. An MRA (spironolactone or eplerenone) is recommended in patients with HFrEF and NYHA class II to IV symptoms to reduce morbidity and mortality, if eGFR is >30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and serum potassium is </=5.0 mEq/L. Hyperkalemia is a major risk of MRA therapy; therefore, careful monitoring of potassium, renal function, and diuretic dosing should be performed at initiation and closely monitored thereafter (Heidenreich et al., 2022).

Selected References

Remove:
  • American Heart Association. Get With The Guidelines® Heart Failure Fact Sheet. 2016.
  • Heidenreich, P., Bozkurt, B., Aguilar, D., Allen, L., Byun, J., Colvin, M., Deswal, A., Drazner, M., Dunlay, S., Evers, L., Fang, J., Fedson, S., Fonarow, G., Hayek, S., Hernandez, A., Khazanie, P., Kittleson, M., Lee, C., Link, M., Milano, C., Nnacheta, L., Sandhu, A., Stevenson, L., Vardeny, O., Vest, A., & Yancy, C. 2022 AHA/ACC2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(18):e895-e1032.
  • Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, Felman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, Jessup M, Konstam MA, Mancini DM, Michl K, Oates JA, Rahko PS, Silver MA, Stevenson LW, Yancy CW. 2009 Focused update incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Circulation. 2009;119(14):e391-e479.
  • Lindenfeld J, Albert NM, Boehmer JP, Collins SP, Ezekowitz JA, Givertz MM, Klapholz M, MoserDK, Rogers JG, Starling RC, Stevenson WG, Tang WHW, Teerlink JR, Walsh MN. Executive Summary: HFSA 2010 Comphrensive Heart Failure Practice Guideline. J Card Fail 2010;16:475-539.
  • Rao, S.V., O’Donoghue, M.L., Ruel, M., Rab, T., Tamis-Holland, J.E., Williams, M.S., et al. (2025). 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. JACC. June 10;85(22):2169.
  • Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJV, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B, Sam F, Stevenson LW, Tang WHW, Tsai EJ, Wilkoff BL. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;128:e240–e327.

Original Performance Measure Source / Developer: American Heart Association. Get With The Guidelines® Heart Failure. 2016.

Add:
  • American Heart Association. (2016). Get with the guidelines® heart failure fact sheet.
  • Heidenreich, P. A., Bozkurt, B., Aguilar, D., Allen, L. A., Byun, J. J., Colvin, M. M., Deswal, A., Drazner, M. H., Dunlay, S. M., Evers, L. R., Fang, J. C., Fedson, S. E., Fonarow, G. C., Hayek, S. S., Hernandez, A. F., Khazanie, P., Kittleson, M. M., Lee, C. S., Link, M. S., Milano, C. A., Nnacheta, L. C., Sandhu, A. T., Stevenson, L. W., Vardeny, O., Vest, A. R., & Yancy, C. W. (2022). 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 145 (18), e895–e1032. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063
  • Hunt, S. A., Abraham, W. T., Chin, M. H., Feldman, A. M., Francis, G. S., Ganiats, T. G., Jessup, M., Konstam, M. A., Mancini, D. M., Michl, K., Oates, J. A., Rahko, P. S., Silver, M. A., Stevenson, L. W., & Yancy, C. W. (2009). Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure in adults: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Circulation, 119 (14), e391–e479. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192065
  • Lindenfeld, J., Albert, N. M., Boehmer, J. P., Collins, S. P., Ezekowitz, J. A., Givertz, M. M., Klapholz, M., Moser, D. K., Rogers, J. G., Starling, R. C., Stevenson, W. G., Tang, W. H. W., Teerlink, J. R., & Walsh, M. N. (2010). Executive summary: HFSA 2010 comprehensive heart failure practice guideline. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 16, 475–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.04.005
  • Rao, S. V., O’Donoghue, M. L., Ruel, M., Rab, T., Tamis-Holland, J. E., Williams, M. S., et al. (2025). 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 85 (22), 2169.
  • Yancy, C. W., Jessup, M., Bozkurt, B., Butler, J., Casey, D. E., Jr., Drazner, M. H., Fonarow, G. C., Geraci, S. A., Horwich, T., Januzzi, J. L., Johnson, M. R., Kasper, E. K., Levy, W. C., Masoudi, F. A., McBride, P. E., McMurray, J. J. V., Mitchell, J. E., Peterson, P. N., Riegel, B., Sam, F., Stevenson, L. W., Tang, W. H. W., Tsai, E. J., & Wilkoff, B. L. (2013). 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 128, e240–e327. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e8776

CCCIP-03 The measure information form was updated to reformat selected references in APA 7th Edition style. Selected References

Remove:
  • Ades, P., Keteyian, S., Wright, J., Hamm, L., Lui, K., Newlin, K., et al. (2017). Increasing Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation From 20% to 70%: A Road Map From the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative. Mayo Clin Proc. Feb; 92(2): 234-242.
  • American Heart Association. (2018). Cardiac Rehab 101. Retrieved April 27, 2018 at: http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/CardiacRehab/What-is-Cardiac-Rehabilitation_UCM_307049_Article.jsp#.WuNs0C7waUl
  • Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. (2014). AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 64:e139–228.
  • Beatty, A., Bradley, S., Maynard, C., McCabe, J., (2017). Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery, and Valve Surgery Data From the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 10:e003364.
  • Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:e123–210.
  • Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of CardiologyFoundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:e44–122.
  • O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. (2013). ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:e78–140.
  • Smith SC Jr., Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. (2011). AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:2432–46.
  • Thomas, R., Balady, G., Banka, G., Beckie, T., Chiu, J., Gokak, S. (2018). 2018 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Cardiac Rehabiliation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e000037.

Original Performance Measure Source / Developer: Thomas, R., Balady, G., Banka, G., Beckie, T., Chiu, J., Gokak, S. (2018).2018 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Cardiac Rehabiliation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e000037.

Add:
  • Ades, P. A., Keteyian, S. J., Wright, J. S., Hamm, L. F., Lui, K., Newlin, K., et al. (2017). Increasing cardiac rehabilitation participation from 20% to 70%: A road map from the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 92 (2), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.014
  • American Heart Association. (2018). Cardiac rehab 101. http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/CardiacRehab/What-is-Cardiac-Rehabilitation_UCM_307049_Article.jsp
  • Amsterdam, E. A., Wenger, N. K., Brindis, R. G., et al. (2014). AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 64, e139–e228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017
  • Beatty, A. L., Bradley, S. M., Maynard, C., & McCabe, J. M. (2017). Referral to cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, and valve surgery: Data from the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 10, e003364. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003364
  • Hillis, L. D., Smith, P. K., Anderson, J. L., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, e123–e210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009
  • Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Blankenship, J. C., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, e44–e122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007
  • O’Gara, P. T., Kushner, F. G., Ascheim, D. D., et al. (2013). ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 61, e78–e140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019
  • Smith, S. C., Jr., Benjamin, E. J., Bonow, R. O., et al. (2011). AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, 2432–2446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.824
  • Thomas, R. J., Balady, G. J., Banka, G., Beckie, T. M., Chiu, J., & Gokak, S. (2018). 2018 ACC/AHA clinical performance and quality measures for cardiac rehabilitation. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 11 (4), e000037. https://doi.org/10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000037
CCCIP-04 The measure information form was updated to reformat selected references in APA 7th Edition style. Selected References

Remove:
  • Ades, P., Keteyian, S., Wright, J., Hamm, L., Lui, K., Newlin, K., et al. (2017). Increasing Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation From 20% to 70%: A Road Map From the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative. Mayo Clin Proc. Feb; 92(2): 234-242.
  • American Heart Association. (2018). Cardiac Rehab 101. Retrieved April 27, 2018 at: http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/CardiacRehab/What-is-Cardiac-Rehabilitation_UCM_307049_Article.jsp#.WuNs0C7waUl
  • Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. (2014). AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 64:e139–228.
  • Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:e123–210.
  • Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of CardiologyFoundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:e44–122.
  • O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. (2013). ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:e78–140.
  • Smith SC Jr., Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. (2011). AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:2432–46.

Original Performance Measure Source / Developer: Thomas, R., Balady, G., Banka, G., Beckie, T., Chiu, J., Gokak, S. (2018).2018 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Cardiac Rehabiliation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e000037.

Add:
  • Ades, P. A., Keteyian, S. J., Wright, J. S., Hamm, L. F., Lui, K., Newlin, K., et al. (2017). Increasing cardiac rehabilitation participation from 20% to 70%: A road map from the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 92 (2), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.014
  • American Heart Association. (2018). Cardiac rehab 101. http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/CardiacRehab/What-is-Cardiac-Rehabilitation_UCM_307049_Article.jsp
  • Amsterdam, E. A., Wenger, N. K., Brindis, R. G., et al. (2014). AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 64, e139–e228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017
  • Hillis, L. D., Smith, P. K., Anderson, J. L., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, e123–e210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009
  • Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Blankenship, J. C., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, e44–e122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007
  • O’Gara, P. T., Kushner, F. G., Ascheim, D. D., et al. (2013). ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 61, e78–e140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019
  • Smith, S. C., Jr., Benjamin, E. J., Bonow, R. O., et al. (2011). AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, 2432–2446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.824
  • Thomas, R. J., Balady, G. J., Banka, G., Beckie, T. M., Chiu, J., & Gokak, S. (2018). 2018 ACC/AHA clinical performance and quality measures for cardiac rehabilitation. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 11 (4), e000037. https://doi.org/10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000037
CCCIP-05 The measure information form was updated to reformat selected references in APA 7th Edition style. Selected References

Remove:
  • Ades, P., Keteyian, S., Wright, J., Hamm, L., Lui, K., Newlin, K., et al. (2017). Increasing Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation From 20% to 70%: A Road Map From the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative. Mayo Clin Proc. Feb; 92(2): 234-242.
  • American Heart Association. (2018). Cardiac Rehab 101. Retrieved April 27, 2018 at: http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/CardiacRehab/What-is-Cardiac-Rehabilitation_UCM_307049_Article.jsp#.WuNs0C7waUl
  • Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. (2014). AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 64:e139–228.
  • Beatty, A., Bradley, S., Maynard, C., McCabe, J., (2017). Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery, and Valve Surgery Data From the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 10:e003364.
  • Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:e123–210.
  • Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of CardiologyFoundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:e44–122.
  • O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. (2013). ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:e78–140.
  • Smith SC Jr., Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. (2011). AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:2432–46.

Original Performance Measure Source / Developer: Thomas, R., Balady, G., Banka, G., Beckie, T., Chiu, J., Gokak, S. (2018). 2018 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Cardiac Rehabiliation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e000037.

Add:
  • Ades, P. A., Keteyian, S. J., Wright, J. S., Hamm, L. F., Lui, K., Newlin, K., et al. (2017). Increasing cardiac rehabilitation participation from 20% to 70%: A road map from the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 92 (2), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.014
  • American Heart Association. (2018). Cardiac rehab 101. http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/CardiacRehab/What-is-Cardiac-Rehabilitation_UCM_307049_Article.jsp
  • Amsterdam, E. A., Wenger, N. K., Brindis, R. G., et al. (2014). AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 64, e139–e228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017
  • Beatty, A. L., Bradley, S. M., Maynard, C., & McCabe, J. M. (2017). Referral to cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, and valve surgery: Data from the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 10, e003364. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003364
  • Hillis, L. D., Smith, P. K., Anderson, J. L., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, e123–e210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009
  • Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Blankenship, J. C., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, e44–e122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007
  • O’Gara, P. T., Kushner, F. G., Ascheim, D. D., et al. (2013). ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 61, e78–e140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019
  • Smith, S. C., Jr., Benjamin, E. J., Bonow, R. O., et al. (2011). AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, 2432–2446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.824
  • Thomas, R. J., Balady, G. J., Banka, G., Beckie, T. M., Chiu, J., & Gokak, S. (2018). 2018 ACC/AHA clinical performance and quality measures for cardiac rehabilitation. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 11 (4), e000037. https://doi.org/10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000037

CCCOP-01 The measure information form was updated to reformat selected references in APA 7th Edition style. Selected References

Remove:
  • Ades, P., Keteyian, S., Wright, J., Hamm, L., Lui, K., Newlin, K., et al. (2017). Increasing Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation From 20% to 70%: A Road Map From the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative. Mayo Clin Proc. Feb; 92(2): 234-242.
  • American Heart Association. (2018). Cardiac Rehab 101. Retrieved April 27, 2018 at: http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/CardiacRehab/What-is-Cardiac-Rehabilitation_UCM_307049_Article.jsp#.WuNs0C7waUl
  • Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. (2014). AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 64:e139–228.
  • Beatty, A., Bradley, S., Maynard, C., McCabe, J., (2017). Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery, and Valve Surgery Data From the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 10:e003364.
  • Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:e123–210.
  • Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of CardiologyFoundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:e44–122.
  • O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. (2013). ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:e78–140.
  • Smith SC Jr., Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. (2011). AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:2432–46.

Original Performance Measure Source / Developer: Thomas, R., Balady, G., Banka, G., Beckie, T., Chiu, J., Gokak, S. (2018). 2018 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Cardiac Rehabiliation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e000037.

Add:
  • Ades, P. A., Keteyian, S. J., Wright, J. S., Hamm, L. F., Lui, K., Newlin, K., et al. (2017). Increasing cardiac rehabilitation participation from 20% to 70%: A road map from the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 92 (2), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.014
  • American Heart Association. (2018). Cardiac rehab 101. http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/CardiacRehab/What-is-Cardiac-Rehabilitation_UCM_307049_Article.jsp
  • Amsterdam, E. A., Wenger, N. K., Brindis, R. G., et al. (2014). AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 64, e139–e228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017
  • Beatty, A. L., Bradley, S. M., Maynard, C., & McCabe, J. M. (2017). Referral to cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, and valve surgery: Data from the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 10, e003364. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003364
  • Hillis, L. D., Smith, P. K., Anderson, J. L., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, e123–e210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009
  • Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Blankenship, J. C., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, e44–e122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007
  • O’Gara, P. T., Kushner, F. G., Ascheim, D. D., et al. (2013). ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 61, e78–e140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019
  • Smith, S. C., Jr., Benjamin, E. J., Bonow, R. O., et al. (2011). AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, 2432–2446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.824
  • Thomas, R. J., Balady, G. J., Banka, G., Beckie, T. M., Chiu, J., & Gokak, S. (2018). 2018 ACC/AHA clinical performance and quality measures for cardiac rehabilitation. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 11 (4), e000037. https://doi.org/10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000037

CCCOP-02 The measure information form was updated to reformat selected references in APA 7th Edition style. Selected References

Remove:
  • Ades, P., Keteyian, S., Wright, J., Hamm, L., Lui, K., Newlin, K., et al. (2017). Increasing Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation From 20% to 70%: A Road Map From the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative. Mayo Clin Proc. Feb; 92(2): 234-242.
  • American Heart Association. (2018). Cardiac Rehab 101. Retrieved April 27, 2018 at: http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/CardiacRehab/What-is-Cardiac-Rehabilitation_UCM_307049_Article.jsp#.WuNs0C7waUl
  • Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. (2014). AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 64:e139–228.
  • Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:e123–210.
  • Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of CardiologyFoundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:e44–122.
  • O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. (2013). ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:e78–140.
  • Smith SC Jr., Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. (2011). AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:2432–46.

Original Performance Measure Source / Developer: Thomas, R., Balady, G., Banka, G., Beckie, T., Chiu, J., Gokak, S. (2018). 2018 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Cardiac Rehabiliation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e000037.

Add:
  • Ades, P. A., Keteyian, S. J., Wright, J. S., Hamm, L. F., Lui, K., Newlin, K., et al. (2017). Increasing cardiac rehabilitation participation from 20% to 70%: A road map from the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 92 (2), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.014
  • American Heart Association. (2018). Cardiac rehab 101. http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/CardiacRehab/What-is-Cardiac-Rehabilitation_UCM_307049_Article.jsp
  • Amsterdam, E. A., Wenger, N. K., Brindis, R. G., et al. (2014). AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 64, e139–e228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017
  • Hillis, L. D., Smith, P. K., Anderson, J. L., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, e123–e210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009
  • Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Blankenship, J. C., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, e44–e122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007
  • O’Gara, P. T., Kushner, F. G., Ascheim, D. D., et al. (2013). ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 61, e78–e140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019
  • Smith, S. C., Jr., Benjamin, E. J., Bonow, R. O., et al. (2011). AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, 2432–2446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.824
  • Thomas, R. J., Balady, G. J., Banka, G., Beckie, T. M., Chiu, J., & Gokak, S. (2018). 2018 ACC/AHA clinical performance and quality measures for cardiac rehabilitation. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 11 (4), e000037. https://doi.org/10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000037
CCCOP-03 The measure information form was updated to reformat selected references in APA 7th Edition style. Selected References

Remove:
  • Ades, P., Keteyian, S., Wright, J., Hamm, L., Lui, K., Newlin, K., et al. (2017). Increasing Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation From 20% to 70%: A Road Map From the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative. Mayo Clin Proc. Feb; 92(2): 234-242.
  • American Heart Association. (2018). Cardiac Rehab 101. Retrieved April 27, 2018 at: http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/CardiacRehab/What-is-Cardiac-Rehabilitation_UCM_307049_Article.jsp#.WuNs0C7waUl
  • Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. (2014). AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 64:e139–228.
  • Beatty, A., Bradley, S., Maynard, C., McCabe, J., (2017). Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery, and Valve Surgery Data From the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 10:e003364.
  • Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:e123–210.
  • Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of CardiologyFoundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:e44–122.
  • O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. (2013). ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:e78–140.
  • Smith SC Jr., Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. (2011). AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 58:2432–46.

Original Performance Measure Source / Developer: Thomas, R., Balady, G., Banka, G., Beckie, T., Chiu, J., Gokak, S. (2018). 2018 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Cardiac Rehabiliation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e000037.

Add:
  • Ades, P. A., Keteyian, S. J., Wright, J. S., Hamm, L. F., Lui, K., Newlin, K., et al. (2017). Increasing cardiac rehabilitation participation from 20% to 70%: A road map from the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 92 (2), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.014
  • American Heart Association. (2018). Cardiac rehab 101. http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/CardiacRehab/What-is-Cardiac-Rehabilitation_UCM_307049_Article.jsp
  • Amsterdam, E. A., Wenger, N. K., Brindis, R. G., et al. (2014). AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 64, e139–e228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017
  • Beatty, A. L., Bradley, S. M., Maynard, C., & McCabe, J. M. (2017). Referral to cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, and valve surgery: Data from the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 10, e003364. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003364
  • Hillis, L. D., Smith, P. K., Anderson, J. L., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, e123–e210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009
  • Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Blankenship, J. C., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, e44–e122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007
  • O’Gara, P. T., Kushner, F. G., Ascheim, D. D., et al. (2013). ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 61, e78–e140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019
  • Smith, S. C., Jr., Benjamin, E. J., Bonow, R. O., et al. (2011). AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58, 2432–2446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.824
  • Thomas, R. J., Balady, G. J., Banka, G., Beckie, T. M., Chiu, J., & Gokak, S. (2018). 2018 ACC/AHA clinical performance and quality measures for cardiac rehabilitation. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 11 (4), e000037. https://doi.org/10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000037
CSTK-01 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
A neurological examination of all patients presenting to the hospital emergency department with warning signs and symptoms of stroke should be a top priority and performed in a timely fashion. Use of a standardized stroke scale or scoring tool ensures that the major components of the neurological examination are evaluated. Clinical practice guidelines from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association recommend The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) as the preferred scoring tool for this purpose. In addition, scoring by a certified examiner is highly recommended. Scores obtained aid in the initial diagnosis of the patient, facilitate communication among healthcare professionals, and identify patient eligibility for various interventions and the potential for complications.

To:
A baseline severity assessment of all patients presenting to the hospital emergency department with warning signs and symptoms of stroke should be a top priority and performed in a timely fashion. Use of a standardized stroke scale or scoring tool ensures that the major components of the neurological examination are evaluated. Clinical practice guidelines from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association recommend the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) for the initial assessment of acute ischemic stroke (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026). In addition, scoring by a certified examiner is highly recommended. Scores obtained aid in the initial diagnosis of the patient, facilitate communication among healthcare professionals, and identify patient eligibility for various interventions and the potential for complications.

Selected References
Remove:
  • Adams HP, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, Grubb RL, Higashida RT, Jauch EC, Kidwell C, Lyden PD, Morgenstern LB, Qureshi AI, Rosenwasser RH, Scott PA, Wijdicks E. Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults with Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups. Stroke. 2007;38:1664-1666.
  • Cote R, Hachinski VC, Shurell BL, Norris JW, Wolfson C. The Canadian Neurological Scale: a preliminary study in acute stroke. Stroke. 1986; 17:731-737.
  • Goldstein LB, Samsa GP. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke. 1997;28:307-310.
  • Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM, Khatri P, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:32-36.
  • Kothari KU, Brott T, Broderick JP, Hamilton CA. Emergency physicians: accuracy in the diagnosis of stroke. Stroke. 1995;26:2238-2241.
  • Leifer D, Bravata DM, Connors JJ III, Hinchey JA, Jauch EC, Johnston SC, Latchaw R, Likosky W, Ogilvy C, Qureshi AI, Summers D, Sung GY, Williams LS, Zorowitz R, on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42:857.
  • Morgenstern LB, Lisabeth LD, Mecozzi AC, Smith MA, Longwell PJ, McFarling DA, Risser JM. A population-based study of acute stroke and TIA diagnosis. Neurology. 2004;62:895-900.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e11-e12.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.

Add:
  • Leifer, D., Bravata, D. M., Connors, J. J., III, Hinchey, J. A., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, S. C., Latchaw, R., Likosky, W., Ogilvy, C., Qureshi, A. I., Summers, D., Sung, G. Y., Williams, L. S., & Zorowitz, R. (2011). Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: Detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 42, 853-54.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e26–e30.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
  • Prabhakaran, S., Gonzalez, N. R., Zachrison, K. S., Adeoye, O., Alexandrov, A. W., Ansari, S. A., Chapman, S., Czap, A. L., Dumitrascu, O. M., Ishida, K., Jadhav, A. P., Johnson, B., Johnston, K. C., Khatri, P., Kimberly, W. T., Lee, V. H., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Mac Grory, B., Madsen, T. E., Menon, B., Mistry, E. A., Park, S., Parker, S., Pérez de la Ossa, N., Reeves, M., Saiz, T., Scott, P. A., Schwartzberg, D., Sheth, S. A., Sporns, P. B., Times, S., Tjoumakaris, S., Wolfe, S. Q., & Yaghi, S.; Peer Review Committee Collaborators. (2026). 2026 guideline for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000513
CSTK-02 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. An error was corrected in the narrative. Rationale
Change from:
The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is the accepted standard for assessing recovery post-stroke. As such, it has become the most widely used clinical outcome measure for stroke clinical trials. Scores are used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in activities of daily living. Score reliability and reproducibility are improved through use of a structured interview by a trained evaluator. Interviews may be conducted in-person or over the phone. According to guideline recommendations from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, standardized interviews to obtain a mRS score should be conducted for acute ischemic stroke patients treated with IV or IA alteplase therapy or mechanical endovascular reperfusion therapy at 3 months (90 days); however, recovery may continue well beyond 3 months for many ischemic stroke patients.

Recent clinical studies (e.g., AURORA, BEST, BASICS, BAOCHE, ATTENTION) have evaluated stroke disability at 90 days following endovascular therapy (EVT) for patients with large vessel occlusions. Patients undergoing EVT were more likely to achieve favorable outcomes and functional independence as assessed by mRS score of 0-2 when compared to medical management.

To:
The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is the accepted standard for assessing recovery post-stroke. As such, it has become the most widely used clinical outcome measure for stroke clinical trials. Scores are used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in activities of daily living. Score reliability and reproducibility are improved through use of a structured interview by a trained evaluator. Interviews may be conducted in-person or over the phone. According to guideline recommendations from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, standardized interviews to obtain a mRS score should be conducted for acute ischemic stroke patients treated with IV or IA alteplase therapy or mechanical endovascular reperfusion therapy at 3 months (90 days); however, recovery may continue well beyond 3 months for many ischemic stroke patients.

Recent clinical studies (e.g., AURORA, BEST, BASICS, BAOCHE, ATTENTION) have evaluated stroke disability at 90 day following endovascular therapy (EVT) for patients with large vessel occlusions. Patients undergoing EVT were more likely to achieve favorable outcomes and functional independence as assessed by mRS score of 0-2 when compared to medical management. (Palaniappan, L. P., et al., 2026).

Selected References
Remove:
  • Adams HP, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, Grubb RL, Higashida RT, Jauch EC, Kidwell C, Lyden PD, Morgenstern LB, Qureshi AI, Rosenwasser RH, Scott PA, Wijdicks E. Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults with Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups. Stroke. 2007;38:1675-1678.
  • Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007:38:2262-2269.
  • Bruno A, Shah N, Lin C, Close B, Hess DC, Davis K, Baute V, Switzer JA, Waller JL, Nichols FT. Simplified modified Rankin scale questionnaire: reproducibility over the telephone and validation with quality of life. Stroke. 2011;42:2276-2279.
  • Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, Dewey HM, Churilov L, Yassi N, et. al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. NEJM. 2015 Mar;372(11): 1009-17.
  • Demchuk AM, Goyal M, Monon BK, Eesa M, Ryckborst KJ, Kamal N, et. al. Endovascular treatment for Small Core and Anterior circulation Proximal occlusion with Emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times (ESCAPE) trial: methodology. Int J Stroke. 2015 Apr;10(3): 429-38.
  • Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM, Khatri P, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:32-36.
  • Leifer D, Bravata DM, Connors JJ III, Hinchey JA, Jauch EC, Johnston SC, Latchaw R, Likosky W, Ogilvy C, Qureshi AI, Summers D, Sung GY, Williams LS, Zorowitz R, on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42:857.
  • Martin, S.S., Aday, A.W., Allen, N.B., Almarzooq, Z.I., Anderson, C.A.M., Arora, P.,…Palaniappan, L.P. “2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.” [In eng]. Circulation 151, (Feb 25 2025): e354.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e10-e11.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, Lees KR. Reliability of the modified Rankin scale. Stroke. 2007:38:e144.
  • Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. Scott Med J. 1957;2(5):200-15.
  • Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, et. al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. NEJM. 2015 Apr: 1-11.
  • Schwamm LH, Holloway RG, Amarenco P. Audebert HJ, Bakas T, Chumbler NR, Handschu R, Jauch EC, Knight WA IV, Levine SR, Mayberg M, Meyer BC, Meyers PM, Skalabrin E, Wechsler LR; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. A review of the evidence for the use of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a scientific statement for the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2009;40:2616-2634.
  • The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. New England Journal of Medicine 1995;333:1581-1587.
  • Turk AS, Frei D, Fiorella D, Mocco J, Baxter B, Siddiqui A, et. al. ADAPT FAST study: a direct aspiration first pass technique for acute stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 May;694): 260-4.
  • Wilson JT, Hareendran A, Hendry A, Potter J. Bone I, Muir KW. Reliability of the modified Rankin scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview. Stroke. 2005;36:777-781.

Add:
  • Campbell, B. C. V., Mitchell, P. J., Kleinig, T. J., Dewey, H. M., Churilov, L., Yassi, N., et al. (2015). Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion imaging selection. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (11), 1009–1017.
  • Demchuk, A. M., Goyal, M., Menon, B. K., Eesa, M., Ryckborst, K. J., Kamal, N., et al. (2015). Endovascular treatment for small core and anterior circulation proximal occlusion with emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times (ESCAPE) trial: Methodology. International Journal of Stroke, 10 (3), 429–438.
  • Leifer, D., Bravata, D. M., Connors, J. J., III, Hinchey, J. A., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, S. C., Latchaw, R., Likosky, W., Ogilvy, C., Qureshi, A. I., Summers, D., Sung, G. Y., Williams, L. S., & Zorowitz, R., on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. (2011). Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: Detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 42, 853-54.
  • Martin, S. S., Aday, A. W., Allen, N. B., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., … Palaniappan, L. P. (2025). 2025 heart disease and stroke statistics: A report of U.S. and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 151, e354.
  • Palaniappan, L. P., Allen, N. B., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., Avery, C. L., Baker-Smith, C. M., Bansal, N., Currie, M. E., Earlie, R. S., Fan, W., Fetterman, J. L., Barone Gibbs, B., Heard, D. G., Hiremath, S., Hong, H., Hyacinth, H. I., Ibeh, C., Jiang, T., … Khan, S. S. (2026). 2026 heart disease and stroke statistics: A report of U.S. and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001412
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e10–e11.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
  • Saver, J. L., Goyal, M., Bonafe, A., Diener, H.-C., Levy, E. I., Pereira, V. M., et al. (2015). Stent retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t PA vs. t PA alone in stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (24), 2285–2295.

CSTK-02 Algorithm Narrative
Change from:
5. Check ICD-10-PCS Principal or Other Procedure Codes.
a. If ICD-10-PCS Principal or Other Procedure Codes equals All Missing or None on Table 8.1a or 8.1b, the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of X and will be rejected. Stop processing.
b. If ICD-10-PCS Principal or Other Procedure Codes equals Any on Table 8.1a or 8.1b continue processing and proceed to check Modified Rankin Score (mRS).

To:
5. Check ICD-10-PCS Principal or Other Procedure Codes.
a. If ICD-10-PCS Principal or Other Procedure Codes equals All Missing or None on Table 8.1a or 8.1b, the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of B and will not be in the Measure Population. Stop processing.
b. If ICD-10-PCS Principal or Other Procedure Codes equals Any on Table 8.1a or 8.1b continue processing and proceed to check Modified Rankin Score (mRS).
CSTK-03 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are medical emergencies requiring rapid diagnosis and assessment. Early deterioration is common in the first few hours after onset, and associated with increased mortality rates of > 75% compared to 30-day mortality rates of 35%-52%. More than half of all deaths from these conditions occur within the first two days. According to the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, the severity of SAHs should be documented with the Hunt and Hess Scale, and the severity of ICHs should be documented with ICH score to capture the clinical state of the patient. The severity of initial neurological injury should be determined and documented in the emergency department because it is a useful predictor of outcome and helpful in planning future care with family and physicians. For both severity methodologies, higher scores are associated with increased mortality.

To:
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are medical emergencies requiring rapid diagnosis and assessment. Early deterioration is common in the first few hours after onset and associated with increased mortality rates of > 75% compared to 30-day mortality rates of 35%-52%. More than half of all deaths from these conditions occur within the first two days. The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association recommends baseline measurement of hemorrhage severity during the initial clinical evaluation (Greenberg, S.M., et al., 2022). The severity of initial neurological injury should be determined and documented in the emergency department because it is a useful predictor of outcome and helpful in planning future care with family and physicians.

The Hunt and Hess (HH) grade is a recommended scoring methodology for patients with SAH (Hoh, B.L., et al., 2023). The ICH score is a validated methodology with clinical data supporting its usefulness for ICH assessment, risk stratification, and quality measurement (Greenberg, S.M., et al., 2022). For both severity methodologies, higher scores are associated with increased mortality.

Selected References
Remove:

1.  Broderick J, Connolly ES, Feldmann E, Hanley D, Kase C, Krieger D, Mayberg M, Morgenstern L, Ogilvy CS, Vespa P, and Zuccarello M. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in adults: 2007 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational told for neurologists. Stroke. 2007;38:2001-2023.

2.  Greenberg SM, Ziai WC, Cordonnier C, Dowlatshahi D, Francis B, Goldstein JN, Hemphill JC 3rd, Johnson R, Keigher KM, Mack WJ, Mocco J, Newton EJ, Ruff IM, Sansing LH, Schulman S, Selim MH, Sheth KN, Sprigg N, Sunnerhagen KS; on behalf of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. 2022 Guideline for the management of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2022;53:e282–e361. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000407.

3.  Hoh BL, Ko NU, Amin-Hanjani S, Chou SH-Y, Cruz-Flores S, Dangayach NS, Derdeyn CP, Du R, Hänggi D, Hetts SW, Ifejika NL, Johnson R; Keigher KM, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Lucke-Wold B, Rabinstein AA, Robicsek SA, Stapleton CJ, Suarez JI, Tjoumakaris SI, Welch BG. 2023 Guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2023;54:e8. doi: 10.1161/STR.000000000000043

4.  Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1968;28:14-20.

5.  Hunt WE, Kosnik EJ. Timing and perioperative care in intracranial aneurysm surgery. Clin Neurosurg. 1974;21:79-89.

6.  Leifer D, Bravata DM, Connors JJ III, Hinchey JA, Jauch EC, Johnston SC, Latchaw R, Likosky W, Ogilvy C, Qureshi AI, Summers D, Sung GY, Williams LS, Zorowitz R, on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42:862-63.

7.  Matchett SC, Castaldo J, Wasser TE, Baker K, Mathiesen C, and Rodgers J. Predicting mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage: comparison of scoring systems and influence of withdrawal of care. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006 Jul-Aug;15(4):144-50.

8.  Morgastern LB, Hemphill JC III, Anderson C, Becker K, Broderick JP, Connolly ES Jr, Greenberg SM, Huang JN, Macdonald RL, Messé SR, Mitchell PH, Selim M, Tamargo RJ; and on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2010;41:2108-2129.

9.  Rosen DS, Macdonald RL. Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review. Neurocritical Care. 2005;2:110-118.

Add:
  • Greenberg, S. M., Ziai, W. C., Cordonnier, C., Dowlatshahi, D., Francis, B., Goldstein, J. N., Hemphill, J. C., III, Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Mack, W. J., Mocco, J., Newton, E. J., Ruff, I. M., Sansing, L. H., Schulman, S., Selim, M. H., Sheth, K. N., Sprigg, N., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2022). 2022 guideline for the management of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 53 (7), e325–e326.
  • Hoh, B. L., Ko, N. U., Amin-Hanjani, S., Chou, S. H.-Y., Cruz-Flores, S., Dangayach, N. S., Derdeyn, C. P., Du, R., Hänggi, D., Hetts, S. W., Ifejika, N. L., Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Lucke-Wold, B., Rabinstein, A. A., Robicsek, S. A., Stapleton, C. J., Suarez, J. I., … Welch, B. G. (2023). 2023 guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 54, e321. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.000000000000043
  • Leifer, D., Bravata, D. M., Connors, J. J., III, Hinchey, J. A., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, S. C., Latchaw, R., Likosky, W., Ogilvy, C., Qureshi, A. I., Summers, D., Sung, G. Y., Williams, L. S., & Zorowitz, R., on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. (2011). Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: Detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 42, 853-54.
CSTK-04 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a life-threatening disorder. Patients receiving oral anticoagulants (OACs), as well as those with an acquired or congenital coagulopathy, are at increased risk for ICH and hemorrhagic expansion with warfarin-associated bleeds comprising 12% to 15% of all spontaneous hemorrhages. Prompt INR reversal with intravenous infusions of vitamin K and fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) has been historically recommended; however, normalization with prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) is increasingly recommended because several studies have shown that these agents can rapidly normalize the INR within minutes. According to Greenberg and colleagues (2022), patients with oral anticoagulation treatment (OAT) associated ICH and an INR above 1.3, should have OAT discontinued and the INR normalized with PCCs or FFP in addition to intravenous infusion of vitamin K.

To:
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a life-threatening disorder. Oral anticoagulation poses significant risk. Despite newer direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) medications, Vitamin K antagonists (VKA), i.e., warfarin, are most frequently prescribed (Zirlik, A., et al., 2016). Intraparenchymal hemorrhage accounts for 90% of all VKA-associated deaths. Death may result from larger hemorrhage volumes, increased risk of hemorrhagic expansion, and an increased number of comorbidities (Frontera, J.A., et al., 2016). Emergency anticoagulation reversal is needed to improve outcomes. In patients with VKA-associated ICH and an international normalized ratio (INR) above 1.3, anticoagulation should be discontinued and the INR normalized within 4 hours to lower in-hospital morbidity (Greenberg, S.M., et al., 2022). Four-Factor PCCs are preferred for rapid reversal followed by intravenous infusion of vitamin K, although fresh frozen plasma (FFP) is an alternative. Specific agents are available for DOAC reversal.

Selected References
Remove:

1.  Ansell J, Hirsch J, Hylek E, Jacobson A, Crowther M, Palareti G; American College of Chest Physicians. Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidleines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008;133(suppl):160S-198S.

2.  Fredriksson K, Norrving B, Strömblad, LG. Emergency reversal of anticoagulation after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 1992;23:972-977.

3.  Frontera JA, Lewin JJ 3rd, Rabinstein AA, Aisiku IP, Alexandrov AW, Cook AM, del Zoppo GJ, Kumar MA, Peerschke EI, Stiefel MF, Teitelbaum JS, Wartenberg KE, Zerfoss CL. Guideline for reversal of antithrombotics in intracranial hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and Society of Critical Care Medicine. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24(1):6-46.

4.  Goldstein JN, Thomas SH, Frontiero V, Joseph A, Engel C, Snider R, Smith EE, Greenberg SM, Rosand J. Timing of fresh frozen plasma administration and rapid correction of coagulopathy in warfarin-related intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2006;37:151-155.

5.  Greenberg SM, Ziai WC, Cordonnier C, Dowlatshahi D, Francis B, Goldstein JN, Hemphill JC III, Johnson R, Keigher KM, Mack WJ, Mocco J, Newton EJ, Ruff IM, Sansing LH, Schulman S, Selim MH, Sheth KN, Sprigg N, Sunnerhagen KS. 2022 guideline for the management of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2022;53(7):e282-e361.

6.  Hanley JP. Warfarin reversal. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:1132-1139.

7.  Leifer D, Bravata DM, Connors JJ III, Hinchey JA, Jauch EC, Johnston SC, Latchaw R, Likosky W, Ogilvy C, Qureshi AI, Summers D, Sung GY, Williams LS, Zorowitz R, on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42:865-866.

8.  Leissinger CA, Blatt PM, Hoots WK, Ewenstein B. Role of prothrombin complex concentrates in reversing warfarin anticoagulation: a review of the literature. Am J Hematol. 2008;83:137-143.

9.  Morgenstern LB, Hemphill JC III, Anderson C, Becker K, Broderick JP, Connolly ES Jr, Greenberg SM, Huang JN, Macdonald RL, Messé SR, Mitchell PH, Selim M, Tamargo RJ; and on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke council and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2010;41:2111-2114.

10.  Nilsson OG, Lindgren A, Ståhl N, Brandt L, Säveland H. Incidence of intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage in southern Sweden. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;69:601-607.

11.   Pabinger I, Brenner B, Kalina U, Knaub S, Nagy A, Ostermann H; Beriplex P/N Reversal Study Group. Prothrombin complex concentrate (Beriplex P/N) for emergency anticoagulation reversal: a prospective multinational clinical trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6:622-631.

12.  Rådberg JA, Olsson JE, Rådberg CT. Prognostic parameters in spontaneous intracerebral hematomas with special reference to anticoagulant treatment. Stroke. 1991;22:571-576.

13.  Reiss H, Meier-Hellman A, Motsch J, Elias M, Kursten FW, Dempfle CE. Prothrombin complex concentrate (Octaplex) in patients requiring immediate reversal of oral anticoagulation. Thromb Res. 2007;121:9-16.

14.  Rosovsky RP, Crowther, MA. What is the evidence for the off-label use of recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa) in the acute reversal of warfarin? Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2008:36-38.

15.  Sjöblom L, Hårdemark HG, Lindgren A, Norrving B, Fahlén M, Samuelsson M, Stigendal L, Stockelberg D, Taghavi A, Wallrup L, Wallvik J. Mangement and prognostic features of intracerebral hemorrhage during anticoagulant therapy: a Swedish multicenter study. Stroke. 2001;32:2567-2574.

16.  Steiner T, Kaste M, Katse M, Forsting M, Mendelow D, Kwiecinski H, Szikora I, Juvela S, Marchel A, Chapot R, Cognard C, Unterberg A. Hacke W. Recommendations for the management of intracranial haemorrhage - part I: spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. The European Stroke Initiative Writing Committee and the Writing Committee for the EUSI Executive Committee. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2006;22(4):294-316.

17.  Watson HG, Baglin T, Laidlaw SL, Makris M, Preston FE. A comparison of the efficacy and rate of response to oral and intravenous vitamin K in reversal of over-anticoagulation with warfarin. Haematol. 2001;115:145-149.

Add:
  • Frontera, J. A., Lewin, J. J., 3rd, Rabinstein, A. A., Aisiku, I. P., Alexandrov, A. W., Cook, A. M., del Zoppo, G. J., Kumar, M. A., Peerschke, E. I., Stiefel, M. F., Teitelbaum, J. S., Wartenberg, K. E., & Zerfoss, C. L. (2016). Guideline for reversal of antithrombotics in intracranial hemorrhage: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and Society of Critical Care Medicine. Neurocritical Care, 24 (1), 6–46.
  • Greenberg, S. M., Ziai, W. C., Cordonnier, C., Dowlatshahi, D., Francis, B., Goldstein, J. N., Hemphill, J. C., III, Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Mack, W. J., Mocco, J., Newton, E. J., Ruff, I. M., Sansing, L. H., Schulman, S., Selim, M. H., Sheth, K. N., Sprigg, N., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2022). 2022 guideline for the management of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 53 (7), e282–e361.
  • Leifer, D., Bravata, D. M., Connors, J. J., III, Hinchey, J. A., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, S. C., Latchaw, R., Likosky, W., Ogilvy, C., Qureshi, A. I., Summers, D., Sung, G. Y., Williams, L. S., & Zorowitz, R., on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. (2011). Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: Detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 42 , 853-54.
  • Zirlik, A., & Bode, C. (2017). Vitamin K antagonists: Relative strengths and weaknesses vs. direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 43 (3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-016-1446-0
CSTK-05 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
Intravenous (IV) alteplase therapy for acute ischemic stroke was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1996, following findings from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) trial which demonstrated favorable outcomes in 31% to 50% of patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA), as compared to 20% to 38% of patients treated with placebo. Intra-arterial (IA) alteplase therapy has since been used to improve recanalization and clinical outcomes for select patients nonresponsive to IV therapy. Intracranial hemorrhage is the major risk of thrombolytic therapy with similar rates reported for both IV and IA routes. The NINDS trial found that 6.4% of patients treated with IV alteplase experienced symptomatic bleeding. Findings from the Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism (PROACT II) study found the intracranial hemorrhage with neurological deterioration within 24 hours occurred in 10% of patients treated with IA recombinant prourokinase. In addition to these agents, other available thrombolytic drugs include: streptokinase, p-anisoylated lys-plasminogen-streptokinase activator, and urokinase.

Endovascular reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke comprises a number of pharmacological and mechanical procedures. Mechanical endovascular thrombectomy is a treatment option for patients with large vessel occlusions in whom pharmacological thrombolysis is contraindicated or might be ineffective. For eligible patients, initiation of EVT (e.g., groin puncture) within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset using a stent retriever is preferred (Powers WJ, et. al., 2015). The use of mechanical thrombectomy devices other than stent retrievers as first-line devices for mechanical thrombectomy may be reasonable in some circumstances (Powers WJ, et. al., 2018). Mechanical endovascular thrombectomy devices are intended to improve tissue rescue and diminish reperfusion hemorrhage while broadening the population eligible for therapy. These devices may be used alone or in conjunction with chemical thrombolysis (i.e., IV or IA alteplase).

To:
Intravenous (IV) alteplase therapy for acute ischemic stroke was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1996, following findings from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) trial which demonstrated favorable outcomes in 31% to 50% of patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA), as compared to 20% to 38% of patients treated with placebo. Intracranial hemorrhage is the major risk of thrombolytic therapy with similar rates reported for both IV and IA routes. The NINDS trialists found that 6.4% of patients treated with IV alteplase experienced symptomatic bleeding. In the NINDS trials, suspicion of hemorrhage within 36 hours of treatment not previously noted on head CT or any decline in neurological status was considered a complication of therapy (von Kummer, et al., 2015). Findings from the Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism (PROACT II) study found the intracranial hemorrhage with neurological deterioration within 24 hours occurred in 10% of patients treated with IA recombinant prourokinase. More recent clinical trials and prospective stroke registries report 2%-7% incidence of sICH after alteplase, (Yaghi, S., et al., 2017).

Endovascular reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke comprises a number of pharmacological and mechanical procedures. Mechanical endovascular thrombectomy is a treatment option for patients with large vessel occlusions in whom pharmacological thrombolysis is contraindicated or might be ineffective. For eligible patients, initiation of EVT (e.g., groin puncture) within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset using a stent retriever is preferred (Powers, W.J., et al., 2015). The use of mechanical thrombectomy devices other than stent retrievers as first-line devices for mechanical thrombectomy may be reasonable in some circumstances (Powers W.J., et al., 2018). Mechanical endovascular thrombectomy devices are intended to improve tissue rescue and diminish reperfusion hemorrhage while broadening the population eligible for therapy. These devices may be used alone or in conjunction with chemical thrombolysis (i.e., IV or IA alteplase).

Over the last decade, mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the standard of care for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusions (LVO). Clinical studies have reported sICH rates between 3.6% and 9.3% following MT, (Hall, E., et al., 2024). Higher rates up to 16% have been reported in real-world practice. The risk of sICH varies significantly based on the location and severity of the initial stroke with higher risk and more severe hemorrhages (i.e., intraventricular and large parenchymal) generally reported for EVT in proximal vessels (e.g., ICA). However, one recent meta-analysis reported higher risk associated with MT in the posterior circulation (RR: 7.48; 95% CI: 2.27-24.61 vs RR: 1.18; 95%CI: 0.90—1.56 )(p=0.003), (Reda, A., et al., 2025).

Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage following reperfusion is a clinical event and potentially critical complication of therapy. The Heidelberg Classification uses both brain imaging to distinguish between hemorrhagic infarction (HI) and parenchymatous hematoma (PH), as well as, changes in NIHSS score to assess neurological deterioration (i.e., >/= 4 point increase). HI 1 and HI 2 are defined as petechial hemorrhages without space-occupying effect; PH 1 and PH 2 are solid clots in the area of infarction with space-occupying effect. PH 2 classification represents a larger blood clot and is associated with increased mortality at 90-days post-ischemic stroke (von Kummer, et al., 2015).

Selected References
Remove:
  • Adams HP Jr, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, Grubb RL, Higashida RT, Jauch EC, Kidwell C, Lyden PD, Morgenstern LB, Qureshi AI, Rosenwasser RH, Scott PA, Wijdicks E. Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults with Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups. Stroke. 2007;38:1664-1666.
  • Adams HP Jr, Brott TG, Furlan AJ, Gomez, CR, Grotta J, Helgason CM, Kwiatkowski T, Lyden PD, Marler JR, Torner J, Feinberg W, Mayberg M, Thies W. Guidelines for thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke: a supplement to the guidleines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Circulation.1996;94;1167-1174.
  • Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, et al. Endovascular treatment after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. NEJM. 2013;368:893-903.
  • Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, Dewey HM, Churilov L, Yassi N, et. al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. NEJM. 2015 Mar;372(11): 1009-17.
  • Ciccone A, Valvassori, Nichelatti M, et. al. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. NEJM. 2013;368:904-913.
  • delZoppo GJ, Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Pessin MS, Gent M, Driscoll RM, and the PROACT Investigators. The Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism Trial (PROACT): results of 6 mg dose tier. Stroke. 1996;27:164.
  • delZoppo GJ, Higashida RT, Furlan AJ. The case for a phase III trial of cerebral intraarterial fibrinolysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994; 15:1217-1222.
  • Demchuk AM, Goyal M, Monon BK, Eesa M, Ryckborst KJ, Kamal N, et. al. Endovascular treatment for Small Core and Anterior circulation Proximal occlusion with Emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times (ESCAPE) trial: methodology. Int J Stroke. 2015 Apr;10(3): 429-38.
  • Donnen GA, Davis SM, Chambers BR, Gates PC, Hankey GJ, McNeil JJ, Rosen D, Stewart-Wynne EG, Tuck RR. Trials of streptokinase in severe acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1995; 345: 578-579.
  • Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialist's (FTT) Collaborative Group. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomized trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet. 1994;343:311-322.
  • Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lesaffre E, von Kummer R, Boysen G, Bluhmki E, Hoxter G, Mahagne MH, Hennerici M, for the ECASS Study Group. Intravenous thrmbolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke: the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study. JAMA. 1995; 274: 1017-1025.
  • Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM, Khatri P, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:32-36.
  • Kidwell CS, Jahan R, Gornbein J, et. al. A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. NEJM. 2013;368:914-923.
  • Koh JS, et al: Safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy with Solitaire stent retrieval for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Neurointervention. 2012;7:1-9.
  • Leifer D, Bravata DM, Connors JJ III, Hinchey JA, Jauch EC, Johnston SC, Latchaw R, Likosky W, Ogilvy C, Qureshi AI, Summers D, Sung GY, Williams LS, Zorowitz R, on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42:858.
  • Levy DE, Brott TG, Haley EC Jr, Marler JR, Sheppard GL, Barsan W, Broderick JP. Factors related to intracranial hematoma formation in patients receiving tissue-type plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:291-297.
  • Marder VJ, Sherry S. Thrombolytic therapy: current status. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1512-1520.
  • Menon BK, Saver JL, Prabhakaran S, Reeves M, Liang L, Olson DWM, Peterson ED, Hernandez AF, Fonarow GC, Schwamm LH, Smith EE. Risk score for intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator. Stroke. 2012;43: 1-9.
  • Multicenter Acute Stroke Trail-Italy (MAST-I) Group. Randomised controlled trial of streptokinase, aspirin, and combination of both in treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1995;346:1509-1514.
  • Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R, Jovin TG, Albers GW, Walker GA, Liebeskind DS, Smith WS, for the TREVO 2 Trialists. Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularization of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomized trial. Lancet. 2012;380:1231-1240.
  • Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, Coffey CS, Jauch EC, Johnston KC, Johnston SC, Khalessi AA, Kidwell CS, Meschia JF, Ovbiagele B, Yavagal DR, on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2015 AHA/ASA focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46; 3021-3035.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e18-e30.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • Rubiera M, Ribo M, Pagola J, Coscojuela P, Rodrigues-Luna D, Maisterra O, Ibarra B, Piñeiro S, Meler P, Romero FJ, Alvarez-Sabin J, Molina CA. Bridging intravenous-intra-arterial rescue strategy increases recanalization and the likelihood of a good outcome in nonresponder intravenous tissue plasminogen activator-treated patients: a case-control study. Stroke. 2011 Apr;42(4):993-997.
  • Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, et. al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. NEJM. 2015 Apr: 1-11.
  • Saver JL, Jahan R, Levy EI, Jovin TG, Baxter B, Nogueira RG, Clark W, Budzik R, Zaidat OO, for the SWIFT Trialists. Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;380:1241-1249.
  • Sims JR, Gharai R, Schaefer PW, Vangel M, Rosenthal ES, Lev MH, Schwamm LH. ABC/2 for rapid clinical estimate of infarct, perfusion, and mismatch volumes. Neurology. 2009;72:2104-2110.
  • Sloan MA, Price TR, Petito CK, Randall AM, Solomon RE, Terrin ML, Gore J, Collen D, Kleiman N, Feit F, Babb J, Herman M, Roberts WC, Spoko G, Bovill E, Forman S, Knatterud GL, for the TIMI Investigators. Clinical Features and pathogenesis of intracerebral hemorrhage after rt-PA and heparin therapy for acute myocardial infarction: the TIMI II pilot and randomisezed clinical trial combined experience. Neurologoy. 1995;45:649-658.
  • Smith WS, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2008;39:1205-1212.
  • The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581-1587.
  • Turk AS, Frei D, Fiorella D, Mocco J, Baxter B, Siddiqui A, et. al. ADAPT FAST study: a direct aspiration first pass technique for acute stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 May;694): 260-4.

Add:
  • Broderick, J. P., Palesch, Y. Y., Demchuk, A. M., et al. (2013). Endovascular treatment after intravenous t PA versus t PA alone for stroke. New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 893–903.
  • Campbell, B. C. V., Mitchell, P. J., Kleinig, T. J., Dewey, H. M., Churilov, L., Yassi, N., et al. (2015). Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion imaging selection. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (11), 1009–1017.
  • Demchuk, A. M., Goyal, M., Menon, B. K., Eesa, M., Ryckborst, K. J., Kamal, N., et al. (2015). Endovascular treatment for small core and anterior circulation proximal occlusion with emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times (ESCAPE) trial: Methodology. International Journal of Stroke, 10 (3), 429–438.
  • Hall, E., Ullberg, T., Andsberg, G., & Wasselius, J. (2024). Incidence of intracranial hemorrhagic complications after anterior circulation endovascular thrombectomy in relation to occlusion site: A nationwide observational register study. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 16 (11), 1088–1093. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-020768
  • Leifer, D., Bravata, D. M., Connors, J. J., III, Hinchey, J. A., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, S. C., Latchaw, R., Likosky, W., Ogilvy, C., Qureshi, A. I., Summers, D., Sung, G. Y., Williams, L. S., & Zorowitz, R., on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. (2011). Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: Detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 42, 853-54.
  • Menon, B. K., Saver, J. L., Prabhakaran, S., Reeves, M., Liang, L., Olson, D. W. M., Peterson, E. D., Hernandez, A. F., Fonarow, G. C., Schwamm, L. H., & Smith, E. E. (2012). Risk score for intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous tissue type plasminogen activator. Stroke, 43, 1–9.
  • Powers, W. J., Derdeyn, C. P., Biller, J., Coffey, C. S., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, K. C., Johnston, S. C., Khalessi, A. A., Kidwell, C. S., Meschia, J. F., Ovbiagele, B., & Yavagal, D. R., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2015). 2015 AHA/ASA focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 46, 3021–3035.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e18–e30.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
  • Reda, A., Hasanzadeh, A., Ghozy, S., Sanjari Moghaddam, H., Adl Parvar, T., Motevaselian, M., Kadirvel, R., Kallmes, D. F., & Rabinstein, A. (2025). Risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy in randomized clinical trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Sciences, 15 (1), Article 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15010063
  • Saver, J. L., Goyal, M., Bonafe, A., Diener, H.-C., Levy, E. I., Pereira, V. M., et al. (2015). Stent retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t PA vs. t PA alone in stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (24), 2285–2295.
  • von Kummer, R., Broderick, J. P., Campbell, B. C. V., Demchuk, A., Goyal, M., Hill, M. D., Treurniet, K. M., Majoie, C. B. L. M., Marquering, H. A., Mazya, M. V., San Román, L., Saver, J. L., Strbian, D., Whiteley, W., & Hacke, W. (2015). The Heidelberg bleeding classification: Classification of bleeding events after ischemic stroke and reperfusion therapy. Stroke, 46 (10), 2981–2986. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010049
  • Yaghi, S., Willey, J. Z., Cucchiara, B., Goldstein, J. N., Gonzales, N. R., Khatri, P., Kim, L. J., Mayer, S. A., Sheth, K. N., & Schwamm, L. H. (2017). Treatment and outcome of hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: A scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 48 (12), e343–e361. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000152
CSTK-06 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
Cerebral vasospasm is a serious complication following SAH, occurring in 30% to 70% of patients and accounting for nearly 50% of the deaths in patients surviving to treatment. Constriction of the arterial lumen results in diminished cerebral perfusion distal to the affected artery, which produces a delayed neurological deficit that may progress to cerebral infarction without early management of the ruptured aneurysm. The arterial narrowing that occurs in cerebral vasospasm is typically a transient or temporary event, lasting from a few days up to 3 weeks. Oral nimodipine is a proven and valuable treatment to prevent or limit the severity of cerebral vasospasm.

To:
Cerebral vasospasm is a serious complication following SAH, occurring in 30% to 70% of patients and accounting for nearly 50% of the deaths in patients surviving to treatment. Constriction of the arterial lumen results in diminished cerebral perfusion distal to the affected artery, which produces a delayed neurological deficit that may progress to cerebral infarction without early management of the ruptured aneurysm. The arterial narrowing that occurs in cerebral vasospasm is typically a transient or temporary event, lasting from a few days up to 3 weeks. Early initiation of oral nimodipine is a proven and valuable treatment to prevent or limit the severity of cerebral vasospasm and improve functional outcome (Hoh, B.L., et al., 2023).

Selected References
Remove:

1.  Adams HP, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, Grubb RL, Higashida RT, Jauch EC, Kidwell C, Lyden PD, Morgenstern LB, Qureshi AI, Rosenwasser RH, Scott PA, Wijdicks E. Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults with Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups. Stroke. 2007;38:1686.

2.  Allen GS, Ahn HS, Presiosi TJ, Battye R,Boone SC, Cho SN, Kelly DL, Weir BK, Crabbe RA, Lavik PJ, Rosenbloom SB, Dorsey FC, Ingram CR, Mellits DE, Bertsch LA, Boisvert DP, Hundley MB, Johnson RK, Strom JA, Transou CR. Cerebral arterial spasm: a controlled trial of nimodipine in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:619-624.

3.  Bederson JB, Connolly ES Jr, Batjer HH, Dacey RG, Dion JE, Diringer MN, Duldner JE Jr, Harbaugh RE, Patel AB, and Rosenwasser RH. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 2009;40:1008-1011.

4.  Fogelholm R, Palomaki H, Erila T, Rissanen A, Kaste M. Blood pressure, nimodipine, and outcome of ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2004;109:200-204.

5.  Haley EC Jr, Kassell NF, Torner JC, Truskowski LL, Germanson TP. A randomized trial of two doses of nicardipine in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a report of the Cooperative Aneurysm Study. J Neurosugr. 1994;80:788-796.

6.  Hoh BL, Ko NU, Amin-Hanjani S, Chou SH-Y, Cruz-Flores S, Dangayach NS, Derdeyn CP, Du R, Hänggi D, Hetts SW, Ifejika NL, Johnson R; Keigher KM, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Lucke-Wold B, Rabinstein AA, Robicsek SA, Stapleton CJ, Suarez JI, Tjoumakaris SI, Welch BG. 2023 Guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2023;54:e26-e33. doi: 10.1161/STR.000000000000043.

7.  Kaste M, Fogelholm R, Erila T, Palomaki H, Murros K, Rissanen A, Sarna S. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of nimodipine in acute ischemic hemispheric stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1348-1353.

8.  Leifer D, Bravata DM, Connors JJ III, Hinchey JA, Jauch EC, Johnston SC, Latchaw R, Likosky W, Ogilvy C, Qureshi AI, Summers D, Sung GY, Williams LS, Zorowitz R, on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42:863-864.

9.  Mayberg MR, Batjer HH, Dacey R, Diringer M, Haley EC, Heros RC, Sternau LL, Torner J, Adams HP Jr, Feinberg W. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 1994;25:2315-2328.

10.  Toyota BD. The efficacy of an abbreviated course of nimodipine in patients with good grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. JNeurosurg. 1999;90(2):203-206.

11.  Wahlgren NG, MacMahon DG, DeKeyser J, Indredavik B, Ryman T. Intravenous Nimodipine West European Stroke Trial (INWEST) of nimodipine in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1994;4:204-210.

12.  The American Nimodipine Study Group. Clinical trial of nimodipine in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1992;23:3-8.

Add:
  • Hoh, B. L., Ko, N. U., Amin-Hanjani, S., Chou, S. H.-Y., Cruz-Flores, S., Dangayach, N. S., Derdeyn, C. P., Du, R., Hänggi, D., Hetts, S. W., Ifejika, N. L., Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Lucke-Wold, B., Rabinstein, A. A., Robicsek, S. A., Stapleton, C. J., Suarez, J. I., … Welch, B. G. (2023). 2023 guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A guideline from[KK1.1] the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 54, e316, e336, e339-41. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.000000000000043
  • Leifer, D., Bravata, D. M., Connors, J. J., III, Hinchey, J. A., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, S. C., Latchaw, R., Likosky, W., Ogilvy, C., Qureshi, A. I., Summers, D., Sung, G. Y., Williams, L. S., & Zorowitz, R., on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. (2011). Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: Detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 42, 853-54.
CSTK-08 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
The Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Reperfusion Grade is used to measure cerebral reperfusion. Four results are possible with this scoring system: 0 (no perfusion); 1 (perfusion past the initial occlusion, but no distal branch filling); 2 (perfusion with incomplete or slow distal branch filling); and , 3 (full perfusion with filling of all distal branches). Reperfusion past the target arterial occlusion and into the distal arterial bed and terminal branches, in conjunction with recanalization of the target arterial occlusion, demonstrates flow restoration or revascularization.

Endovascular therapy (EVT) is now the standard of care for treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO). In 2015, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association published a focused update to the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke regarding endovascular treatment (Powers WJ, et. al., 2015). Endovascular therapy with a stent retriever is recommended for eligible patients. The use of mechanical thrombectomy devices other than stent retrievers as first-line devices for mechanical thrombectomy may be reasonable in some circumstances, but stent retrievers remain the first choice (Powers WJ, et. al., 2018).

To:
The Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Reperfusion Grade is used to measure cerebral reperfusion. Results with this scoring system range between zero and three: 0 (no perfusion); 1 (perfusion past the initial occlusion, but no distal branch filling); 2 (perfusion with incomplete or slow distal branch filling); and, 3 (full perfusion with filling of all distal branches). Reperfusion past the target arterial occlusion and into the distal arterial bed and terminal branches, in conjunction with recanalization of the target arterial occlusion, demonstrates flow restoration or revascularization.

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with a stent retriever is the standard of care for treatment of acute ischemic stroke from anterior circulation proximal large-vessel occlusion (LVO). The use of mechanical thrombectomy devices other than stent retrievers as first-line devices for mechanical thrombectomy may be reasonable in some circumstances, but stent retrievers remain the first choice (Powers W.J., et al., 2018).

Selected References
Remove:
  • Adams HP, Brott TG, Furlan AJ, Gomez CR, Grotta J, Helgason CM, Kwiatkowski T, Lyden PD, Marler JR, Torner J, et. al. Guidelines for thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke: a supplement to the guidelines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Circulation. 1996;94:1167-1174.
  • Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). 2004.
  • Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:210-—47.
  • Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, Dewey HM, Churilov L, Yassi N, et. al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. NEJM. 2015 Mar;372(11): 1009-17.
  • Demchuk AM, Goyal M, Monon BK, Eesa M, Ryckborst KJ, Kamal N, et. al. Endovascular treatment for Small Core and Anterior circulation Proximal occlusion with Emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times (ESCAPE) trial: methodology. Int J Stroke. 2015 Apr;10(3): 429-38.
  • Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM, Khatri P, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:32-36.
  • Khatari P, Abruzzo T, Yeatts SD, Nichols C, Broderick JP, Tomsick TA; IMS I and II Investigators. Good clinical outcome after ischemic stroke with successful revascularization is time-dependent. Neurology. 2009 Sep 29;73(13):1066-72.
  • Kole M, Amin B, Marin H, Russman A, Sanders W. Intracranial angioplasty and stent placement for direct cerebral revascularization o nonacute intracranial occlusions and near occlusions. NeuroSurg Focus. 2009; 26(3): E3.
  • Leifer D, Bravata DM, Connors JJ III, Hinchey JA, Jauch EC, Johnston SC, Latchaw R, Likosky W, Ogilvy C, Qureshi AI, Summers D, Sung GY, Williams LS, Zorowitz R, on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42; 857.
  • Menon BK, Saver JL, Prabhakaran S, Reeves M, Liang L, Olson DWM, Peterson ED, Hernandez AF, Fonarow GC, Schwamm LH, Smith EE. Risk score for intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator. Stroke. 2012;43: 1-9.
  • Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, Coffey CS, Jauch EC, Johnston KC, Johnston SC, Khalessi AA, Kidwell CS, Meschia JF, Ovbiagele B, Yavagal DR, on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2015 AHA/ASA focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46; 3021-3035.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e10-e11, e26-e30.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • Rha JH, Saver JL. The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke.
  • Sacks D, Black CM, Cognard C, Connors III JJ, Frei D, Gupta R, Jovin TG, Kluck B, Meyers PM, Murphy KJ, Ramee S, Rϋfenacht DA, Stallmeyer MJB, Vorwerk D. Multisociety consensus quality improvement guidelines for intraarterial catheter-directed treatment of acute ischemic stroke from the American Society of Neuroradiology, Canadian Interventional Radiology Association, Cardiovascular and interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy, and Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:151-163.
  • Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, et. al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. NEJM. 2015 Apr: 1-11.
  • Sharma VK, Teoh HL, Wong LYH, Su J, Ong BKC, and Chan BLP. Recanalization therapies in acute ischemic stroke: pharmacological agents, devices, and combinations. Stroke Research and Treatment. 2010.
  • Sims JR, Gharai R, Schaefer PW, Vangel M, Rosenthal ES, Lev MH, Schwamm LH. ABC/2 for rapid clinical estimate of infarct, perfusion, and mismatch volumes. Neurology. 2009;72:2104-2110.
  • Tomsick T, Broderick J, Carrosella J, Khatari P, Hill M, Palesch Y, Khoury J; Interventional Management of Stroke II Investigators. Revascularizaton results in the Interventional Management of Stroke II Trial. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2008 Mar; 29(3): 582-587.
  • Turk AS, Frei D, Fiorella D, Mocco J, Baxter B, Siddiqui A, et. al. ADAPT FAST study: a direct aspiration first pass technique for acute stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 May;694): 260-4.

Add:
  • Campbell, B. C. V., Mitchell, P. J., Kleinig, T. J., Dewey, H. M., Churilov, L., Yassi, N., et al. (2015). Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion imaging selection. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (11), 1009–1017.
  • Demchuk, A. M., Goyal, M., Menon, B. K., Eesa, M., Ryckborst, K. J., Kamal, N., et al. (2015). Endovascular treatment for small core and anterior circulation proximal occlusion with emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times (ESCAPE) trial: Methodology. International Journal of Stroke, 10 (3), 429–438.
  • Leifer, D., Bravata, D. M., Connors, J. J., III, Hinchey, J. A., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, S. C., Latchaw, R., Likosky, W., Ogilvy, C., Qureshi, A. I., Summers, D., Sung, G. Y., Williams, L. S., & Zorowitz, R., on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. (2011). Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: Detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 42, 853-54.
  • Menon, B. K., Saver, J. L., Prabhakaran, S., Reeves, M., Liang, L., Olson, D. W. M., Peterson, E. D., Hernandez, A. F., Fonarow, G. C., Schwamm, L. H., & Smith, E. E. (2012). Risk score for intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous tissue type plasminogen activator. Stroke, 43, 1–9.
  • Powers, W. J., Derdeyn, C. P., Biller, J., Coffey, C. S., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, K. C., Johnston, S. C., Khalessi, A. A., Kidwell, C. S., Meschia, J. F., Ovbiagele, B., & Yavagal, D. R., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2015). 2015 AHA/ASA focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 46, 3021–3035.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e26–e30.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
  • Prabhakaran, S., Gonzalez, N. R., Zachrison, K. S., Adeoye, O., Alexandrov, A. W., Ansari, S. A., Chapman, S., Czap, A. L., Dumitrascu, O. M., Ishida, K., Jadhav, A. P., Johnson, B., Johnston, K. C., Khatri, P., Kimberly, W. T., Lee, V. H., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Mac Grory, B., Madsen, T. E., Menon, B., Mistry, E. A., Park, S., Parker, S., Pérez de la Ossa, N., Reeves, M., Saiz, T., Scott, P. A., Schwartzberg, D., Sheth, S. A., Sporns, P. B., Times, S., Tjoumakaris, S., Wolfe, S. Q., & Yaghi, S.; Peer Review Committee Collaborators. (2026). 2026 guideline for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000513
  • Saver, J. L., Goyal, M., Bonafe, A., Diener, H.-C., Levy, E. I., Pereira, V. M., et al. (2015). Stent retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t PA vs. t PA alone in stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (24), 2285–2295.
CSTK-09 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
Timely recanalization of an occluded intracerebral artery is a strong predictor of improved functional outcome and reduced mortality in patients with an acute ischemic stroke. Initiation of intra-venous (IV) alteplase within three hours of time last known well is recommended first before attempting other treatment; however, endovascular treatment (EVT) with mechanical retrieval devices is also recommended after IV thrombolysis failure or lapse of the therapeutic window. For eligible patients, initiation of EVT (e.g., groin puncture) within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset using a stent retriever is preferred (Powers WJ, et. al., 2015). Findings from clinical trials published in 2018 ( i.e., DAWN, DEFUSE 3) have reported the benefits of mechanical thrombectomy in the extended window up to 24 hours of last known well for select ischemic stroke patients meeting certain criteria. The use of mechanical thrombectomy devices other than stent retrievers as first-line devices for mechanical thrombectomy may be reasonable in some circumstances, but stent retrievers remain the first choice (Powers WJ, et. al., 2018).

Since “time is brain”, the overall speed of the revascularization process is an important and appropriate measure. In multicenter clinical trials of intra-arterial catheter-directed therapies, the probability of good outcome as defined by a Modified Rankin Score of 0-2 at 90 days decreased as time to angiographic revascularization increased. It is estimated that for every 30-minute delay in time to revascularization, there is a 10% decrease in the likelihood of a good outcome from EVT. Five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published in 2015 demonstrated the benefit of timely endovascular therapy in select patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (Jahan R et al., 2019).

American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines® (GWTG) sets a goal for Door-To-Puncture (DTP) Time within 90 minutes. Recent studies have reported that shorter DTP times may be achieved. Jahan and colleagues studied the time-benefit relationship in a large cohort of 6756 acute ischemic stroke patients from the GWTG clinical registry who underwent endovascular therapy within 8 hours of symptom onset. Findings from this study suggest that national quality target DTP times could be within 75 minutes for patients arriving directly to the hospital via emergency medical services (EMS) and within 45 minutes for patients transferred from another acute care hospital.

To:
Timely recanalization of an occluded intracerebral artery is a strong predictor of improved functional outcome and reduced mortality in patients with an acute ischemic stroke. Initiation of intra-venous (IV) alteplase within three hours of time last known well is recommended first before attempting other treatment; however, endovascular treatment (EVT) with mechanical retrieval devices is also recommended after IV thrombolysis failure or lapse of the therapeutic window. For eligible patients, initiation of EVT (e.g., groin puncture) within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset using a stent retriever is preferred (Powers WJ, et. al., 2015). Findings from clinical trials published in 2018 ( i.e., DAWN, DEFUSE 3) have reported the benefits of mechanical thrombectomy in the extended window up to 24 hours of last known well for select ischemic stroke patients meeting certain criteria. The use of mechanical thrombectomy devices other than stent retrievers as first-line devices for mechanical thrombectomy may be reasonable in some circumstances, but stent retrievers remain the first choice (Powers WJ, et. al., 2018).

Since “time is brain”, the overall speed of the revascularization process is an important and appropriate measure. In multicenter clinical trials of intra-arterial catheter-directed therapies, the probability of good outcome as defined by a Modified Rankin Score of 0-2 at 90 days decreased as time to angiographic revascularization increased. It is estimated that for every 30-minute delay in time to revascularization, there is a 10% decrease in the likelihood of a good outcome from EVT. Five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published in 2015 demonstrated the benefit of timely endovascular therapy in select patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (Jahan R. et al., 2019).

The American Heart Association® Target Stroke Phase III initiative raises the bar for timely EVT therapy with a goal for Door-To- Device (DTN), i.e., arrival to first pass of thrombectomy device, within 90 minutes (for direct arriving patients) and within 60 minutes (for transfer patients), (AHA, 2018). Door-To-Puncture (DTP) time should be less than these targets. Recent studies have reported that shorter DTP times may be achieved. Jahan and colleagues studied the time-benefit relationship in a large cohort of 6756 acute ischemic stroke patients from the GWTG clinical registry who underwent endovascular therapy within 8 hours of symptom onset. Findings from this study suggest that national quality target DTP times could be within 75 minutes for patients arriving directly to the hospital via emergency medical services (EMS) and within 45 minutes for patients transferred from another acute care hospital.

In AIS patients eligible for mechanical thrombectomy, Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) may increase the identification and triage of LVO, notify a thrombectomy-capable center of impending transfer and expedite transport, resulting in faster treatment. 2026 updated guidelines from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association recommend the use of MSU over conventional EMS transport where available. (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026).

Selected References
Remove:
  • Adams HP, Brott TG, Furlan AJ, Gomez CR, Grotta J, Helgason CM, Kwiatkowski T, Lyden PD, Marler JR, Torner J, et. al. Guidelines for thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke: a supplement to the guidelines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Circulation. 1996;94:1167-1174.
  • Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, Christensen S, Tsai JP, Ortega-Gutierrez S, et. al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. NEJM. 2018;378(8): 708-718.
  • Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). 2004.
  • Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:210—-47.
  • Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, Dewey HM, Churilov L, Yassi N, et. al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. NEJM. 2015 Mar;372(11): 1009-17.
  • Demchuk AM, Goyal M, Monon BK, Eesa M, Ryckborst KJ, Kamal N, et. al. Endovascular treatment for Small Core and Anterior circulation Proximal occlusion with Emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times (ESCAPE) trial: methodology. Int J Stroke. 2015 Apr;10(3): 429-38.
  • Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, et. al. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study; a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Actue Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA. 1999;282:2003-2011.
  • Jahan R, Saver JL, Schwamm LH, Fonarow G, Liang L, Matsouaka RA, Xian Y, et al. Association Between Time to Treatment With Endovascular Reperfusion Therapy and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated in Clinical Practice. JAMA. 2019;322(3):252-263.
  • Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM, Khatri P, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:32-36.
  • Khatari P, Abruzzo T, Yeatts SD, Nichols C, Broderick JP, Tomsick TA; IMS I and II Investigators. Good clinical outcome after ischemic stroke with successful revascularization is time-dependent. Neurology. 2009 Sep 29;73(13):1066-72.
  • Khatari P, Hill MD, Palesch YY, et. al. Methodology of the Interventional Manaagement of Stroke III Trial. Int J Stroke. 2008;3:130-137.
  • Leifer D, Bravata DM, Connors JJ III, Hinchey JA, Jauch EC, Johnston SC, Latchaw R, Likosky W, Ogilvy C, Qureshi AI, Summers D, Sung GY, Williams LS, Zorowitz R, on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42; 857.
  • Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, Bonafe A, Budzik RF, Bhuva P, et. al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. NEJM. 2018;378(1): 11-21.
  • Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators. The penumbra pivotal stroke trial: safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke. 2009;40:2761-2768.
  • Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, Coffey CS, Jauch EC, Johnston KC, Johnston SC, Khalessi AA, Kidwell CS, Meschia JF, Ovbiagele B, Yavagal DR, on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2015 AHA/ASA focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46; 3021-3035.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e26-e30.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • Rha JH, Saver JL. The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke.
  • Sacks D, Black CM, Cognard C, Connors JJ III, Frei D, Gupta R, Jovin TG, Kluck B, Meyers PM, Murphy KJ, Ramee S, Rϋfenacht DA, Stallmeyer MJB, Vorwerk D. Multisociety consensus quality improvement guidelines for intraarterial catheter-directed treatment of acute ischemic stroke from the American Society of Neuroradiology, Canadian Interventional Radiology Association, Cardiovascular and interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy, and Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:151-163.
  • Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, et. al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. NEJM. 2015 Apr: 1-11.
  • Sharma VK, Teoh HL, Wong LYH, Su J, Ong BKC, and Chan BLP. Recanalization therapies in acute ischemic stroke: pharmacological agents, devices, and combinations. Stroke Research and Treatment. 2010.
  • Smith WS, Sung G, Saver J, et. al. Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the Multi MERCI trial. Stroke. 2008;39:1205-1212.
  • Tarr R, Hsu D, Kulcsar Z, et. al. The POST trial: initial post-market experience of the Penumbra system: revascularization of large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke in the United States and Europe. _J Neurointerv Surg. 2010;2:341-344.
  • Turk AS, Frei D, Fiorella D, Mocco J, Baxter B, Siddiqui A, et. al. ADAPT FAST study: a direct aspiration first pass technique for acute stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 May;694): 260-4.

Add:
  • Albers, G. W., Marks, M. P., Kemp, S., Christensen, S., Tsai, J. P., Ortega Gutierrez, S., et al. (2018). Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. The New England Journal of Medicine, 378 (8), 708–718.
  • American Heart Association. (2018). Phase III Target: Stroke: Higher goals for greater good. https://www.stroke.org/-/media/files/professional/quality-improvement/target-stroke/target-stroke-phase-iii/aha-qi-target-stroke-phase-3-brochure.pdf.
  • Campbell, B. C. V., Mitchell, P. J., Kleinig, T. J., Dewey, H. M., Churilov, L., Yassi, N., et al. (2015). Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion imaging selection. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (11), 1009–1017.
  • Demchuk, A. M., Goyal, M., Menon, B. K., Eesa, M., Ryckborst, K. J., Kamal, N., et al. (2015). Endovascular treatment for small core and anterior circulation proximal occlusion with emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times (ESCAPE) trial: Methodology. International Journal of Stroke, 10 (3), 429–438.
  • Jahan, R., Saver, J. L., Schwamm, L. H., Fonarow, G., Liang, L., Matsouaka, R. A., & Xian, Y. (2019). Association between time to treatment with endovascular reperfusion therapy and outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated in clinical practice. JAMA, 322 (3), 252–263.
  • Leifer, D., Bravata, D. M., Connors, J. J., III, Hinchey, J. A., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, S. C., Latchaw, R., Likosky, W., Ogilvy, C., Qureshi, A. I., Summers, D., Sung, G. Y., Williams, L. S., & Zorowitz, R., on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. (2011). Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: Detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 42, 853-54.
  • Nogueira, R. G., Jadhav, A. P., Haussen, D. C., Bonafe, A., Budzik, R. F., Bhuva, P., …(2018). Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. New England Journal of Medicine, 378 (1), 11–21.
  • Powers, W. J., Derdeyn, C. P., Biller, J., Coffey, C. S., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, K. C., Johnston, S. C., Khalessi, A. A., Kidwell, C. S., Meschia, J. F., Ovbiagele, B., & Yavagal, D. R., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2015). 2015 AHA/ASA focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 46, 3021–3035.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e26–e30.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
  • Prabhakaran, S., Gonzalez, N. R., Zachrison, K. S., Adeoye, O., Alexandrov, A. W., Ansari, S. A., Chapman, S., Czap, A. L., Dumitrascu, O. M., Ishida, K., Jadhav, A. P., Johnson, B., Johnston, K. C., Khatri, P., Kimberly, W. T., Lee, V. H., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Mac Grory, B., Madsen, T. E., Menon, B., Mistry, E. A., Park, S., Parker, S., Pérez de la Ossa, N., Reeves, M., Saiz, T., Scott, P. A., Schwartzberg, D., Sheth, S. A., Sporns, P. B., Times, S., Tjoumakaris, S., Wolfe, S. Q., & Yaghi, S.; Peer Review Committee Collaborators. (2026). 2026 guideline for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000513
  • Saver, J. L., Goyal, M., Bonafe, A., Diener, H.-C., Levy, E. I., Pereira, V. M., et al. (2015). Stent retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t PA vs. t PA alone in stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (24), 2285–2295.
CSTK-10 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is the accepted standard for assessing recovery post-stroke. As such, it has become the most widely used clinical outcome measure for stroke clinical trials. Scores are used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in activities of daily living. Score reliability and reproducibility are improved through use of a structured interview by a trained evaluator. Interviews may be conducted in-person or over the phone. According to guideline recommendations from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, standardized interviews to obtain a mRS score should be conducted for acute ischemic stroke patients treated with IV or IA alteplase therapy or mechanical endovascular reperfusion therapy at 3 months (90 days); however, recovery may continue well beyond 3 months for many ischemic stroke patients.

Recent clinical studies (e.g., AURORA, BEST, BASICS, BAOCHE, ATTENTION) have evaluated stroke disability at 90 days following endovascular therapy (EVT) for patients with large vessel occlusions. Patients undergoing EVT were more likely to achieve favorable outcomes and functional independence as assessed by mRS score of 0-2 when compared to medical management.

To:
The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is the accepted standard for assessing recovery post-stroke. As such, it has become the most widely used clinical outcome measure for stroke clinical trials. Scores are used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in activities of daily living. Score reliability and reproducibility are improved through use of a structured interview by a trained evaluator. Interviews may be conducted in-person or over the phone. According to guideline recommendations from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, standardized interviews to obtain a mRS score should be conducted for acute ischemic stroke patients treated with IV or IA alteplase therapy or mechanical endovascular reperfusion therapy at 3 months (90 days); however, recovery may continue well beyond 3 months for many ischemic stroke patients.

Recent clinical studies (e.g., AURORA, BEST, BASICS, BAOCHE, ATTENTION) have evaluated stroke disability at 90 day following endovascular therapy (EVT) for patients with large vessel occlusions. Patients undergoing EVT were more likely to achieve favorable outcomes and functional independence as assessed by mRS score of 0-2 when compared to medical management. (Palaniappan, L. P., et al., 2026).

Selected References
Remove:
  • Adams HP, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, Grubb RL, Higashida RT, Jauch EC, Kidwell C, Lyden PD, Morgenstern LB, Qureshi AI, Rosenwasser RH, Scott PA, Wijdicks E. Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults with Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups. Stroke. 2007;38:1675-1678.
  • Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007:38:2262-2269.
  • Bruno A, Shah N, Lin C, Close B, Hess DC, Davis K, Baute V, Switzer JA, Waller JL, Nichols FT. Simplified modified Rankin scale questionnaire: reproducibility over the telephone and validation with quality of life. Stroke. 2011;42:2276-2279.
  • Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, Dewey HM, Churilov L, Yassi N, et. al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. NEJM. 2015 Mar;372(11): 1009-17.
  • Demchuk AM, Goyal M, Monon BK, Eesa M, Ryckborst KJ, Kamal N, et. al. Endovascular treatment for Small Core and Anterior circulation Proximal occlusion with Emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times (ESCAPE) trial: methodology. Int J Stroke. 2015 Apr;10(3): 429-38.
  • Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM, Khatri P, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:32-36.
  • Leifer D, Bravata DM, Connors JJ III, Hinchey JA, Jauch EC, Johnston SC, Latchaw R, Likosky W, Ogilvy C, Qureshi AI, Summers D, Sung GY, Williams LS, Zorowitz R, on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42:857.
  • Martin, S.S., Aday, A.W., Allen, N.B., Almarzooq, Z.I., Anderson, C.A.M., Arora, P.,…Palaniappan, L.P. “2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.” [In eng]. Circulation 151, (Feb 25 2025): e354.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e10-e11.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, Lees KR. Reliability of the modified Rankin scale. Stroke. 2007:38:e144.
  • Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. Scott Med J. 1957;2(5):200-15.
  • Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, et. al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. NEJM. 2015 Apr: 1-11.
  • Schwamm LH, Holloway RG, Amarenco P. Audebert HJ, Bakas T, Chumbler NR, Handschu R, Jauch EC, Knight WA IV, Levine SR, Mayberg M, Meyer BC, Meyers PM, Skalabrin E, Wechsler LR; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. A review of the evidence for the use of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a scientific statement for the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2009;40:2616-2634.
  • The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. New England Journal of Medicine 1995;333:1581-1587.
  • Turk AS, Frei D, Fiorella D, Mocco J, Baxter B, Siddiqui A, et. al. ADAPT FAST study: a direct aspiration first pass technique for acute stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 May;694): 260-4.
  • Wilson JT, Hareendran A, Hendry A, Potter J. Bone I, Muir KW. Reliability of the modified Rankin scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview. Stroke. 2005;36:777-781.

Add:
  • Campbell, B. C. V., Mitchell, P. J., Kleinig, T. J., Dewey, H. M., Churilov, L., Yassi, N., et al. (2015). Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion imaging selection. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (11), 1009–1017.
  • Demchuk, A. M., Goyal, M., Menon, B. K., Eesa, M., Ryckborst, K. J., Kamal, N., et al. (2015). Endovascular treatment for small core and anterior circulation proximal occlusion with emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times (ESCAPE) trial: Methodology. International Journal of Stroke, 10 (3), 429–438.
  • Leifer, D., Bravata, D. M., Connors, J. J., III, Hinchey, J. A., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, S. C., Latchaw, R., Likosky, W., Ogilvy, C., Qureshi, A. I., Summers, D., Sung, G. Y., Williams, L. S., & Zorowitz, R., on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. (2011). Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: Detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 42, 853-54.
  • Martin, S. S., Aday, A. W., Allen, N. B., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., … Palaniappan, L. P. (2025). 2025 heart disease and stroke statistics: A report of U.S. and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 151, e354.
  • Palaniappan, L. P., Allen, N. B., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., Avery, C. L., Baker-Smith, C. M., Bansal, N., Currie, M. E., Earlie, R. S., Fan, W., Fetterman, J. L., Barone Gibbs, B., Heard, D. G., Hiremath, S., Hong, H., Hyacinth, H. I., Ibeh, C., Jiang, T., … Khan, S. S. (2026). 2026 heart disease and stroke statistics: A report of U.S. and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001412
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e10–e11.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
  • Saver, J. L., Goyal, M., Bonafe, A., Diener, H.-C., Levy, E. I., Pereira, V. M., et al. (2015). Stent retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t PA vs. t PA alone in stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (24), 2285–2295.
CSTK-11 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
The Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Reperfusion Grade is used to measure cerebral reperfusion. Results with this scoring system range between zero and three: 0 (no perfusion); 1 (perfusion past the initial occlusion, but no distal branch filling); 2 (perfusion with incomplete or slow distal branch filling); and, 3 (full perfusion with filling of all distal branches). Reperfusion past the target arterial occlusion and into the distal arterial bed and terminal branches, in conjunction with recanalization of the target arterial occlusion, demonstrates flow restoration or revascularization.

Endovascular therapy (EVT) is now the standard of care for treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO). In 2015, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association published a focused update to the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke regarding endovascular treatment (Powers WJ, et. al., 2015). Endovascular therapy with a stent retriever is recommended for eligible patients. The use of mechanical thrombectomy devices other than stent retrievers as first-line devices for mechanical thrombectomy may be reasonable in some circumstances, but stent retrievers remain the first choice (Powers WJ, et. al., 2018).

To ensure benefit, reperfusion to TICI 2B/3 should be achieved as early as possible and within 6 hours of stroke onset. The DAWN Clinical Trial Investigators (Nogueira RG, et. al., 2018) reported the benefits of mechanical thrombectomy in the extended window up to 24 hours of last known well for select patients meeting certain criteria. As with IV alteplase (t-PA), reduced time from symptom onset to reperfusion with EVT is highly associated with better clinical outcomes. Recent recommendations from the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN) offer procedural metrics which include time from hospital arrival to groin puncture less than 90 minutes, and time from groin puncture to TICI 2B or better or conclusion of procedure less than 60 minutes (English JD, et. al., 2016).

To:
The Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Reperfusion Grade is used to measure cerebral reperfusion. Results with this scoring system range between zero and three: 0 (no perfusion); 1 (perfusion past the initial occlusion, but no distal branch filling); 2 (perfusion with incomplete or slow distal branch filling); and, 3 (full perfusion with filling of all distal branches). Reperfusion past the target arterial occlusion and into the distal arterial bed and terminal branches, in conjunction with recanalization of the target arterial occlusion, demonstrates flow restoration or revascularization.

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with a stent retriever is the standard of care for treatment of acute ischemic stroke from anterior circulation proximal large-vessel occlusion (LVO), (Powers W.J., et al., 2018). Reperfusion to TICI 2B/3 should be achieved as early as possible, preferably within 6 hours of stroke onset. The DAWN Clinical Trial Investigators, (Nogueira R.G., et al., 2018), reported the benefits of mechanical thrombectomy in the extended window up to 24 hours of last known well for select patients meeting certain criteria. Time from stroke onset to hospital arrival , initial NIHSS score, prestroke mRS, ASPECTS, patient age, and other factors should be considerations when deciding a treatment window between 6 and 24 hours (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026). As with IV alteplase (t-PA), reduced time from symptom onset to reperfusion with EVT is highly associated with better clinical outcomes. Recommendations from the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN) offer procedural metrics which include time from hospital arrival to groin puncture less than 90 minutes, and time from groin puncture to TICI 2B or better or conclusion of procedure less than 60 minutes (English J.D., et al., 2016).

Selected References
Remove:
  • Adams HP, Brott TG, Furlan AJ, Gomez CR, Grotta J, Helgason CM, Kwiatkowski T, Lyden PD, Marler JR, Torner J, et. al. Guidelines for thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke: a supplement to the guidelines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Circulation. 1996;94:1167-1174.
  • Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, Christensen S, Tsai JP, Ortega-Gutierrez S, et. al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. NEJM. 2018;378(8): 708-718.
  • Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). 2004.
  • Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:210-—47.
  • Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, Dewey HM, Churilov L, Yassi N, et. al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. NEJM. 2015 Mar;372(11): 1009-17.
  • Demchuk AM, Goyal M, Monon BK, Eesa M, Ryckborst KJ, Kamal N, et. al. Endovascular treatment for Small Core and Anterior circulation Proximal occlusion with Emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times (ESCAPE) trial: methodology. Int J Stroke. 2015 Apr;10(3): 429-38.
  • English JD, Yavagal DR, Gupta R, Janardhan V, Zaidat OO, Xavier AR, Nogueira RG, Kirmani JF, Jovin TG. Mechanical thrombectomy-ready comprehensive stroke center requirements and endovascular stroke systems of care: recommendations from the endovascular stroke standards committee of the Society of Vascular and interventional Neurology (SVIN). Intervent Neurol. 2015;4:138-50.
  • Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM, Khatri P, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:32-36.
  • Khatari P, Abruzzo T, Yeatts SD, Nichols C, Broderick JP, Tomsick TA; IMS I and II Investigators. Good clinical outcome after ischemic stroke with successful revascularization is time-dependent. Neurology. 2009 Sep 29;73(13):1066-72.
  • Kole M, Amin B, Marin H, Russman A, Sanders W. Intracranial angioplasty and stent placement for direct cerebral revascularization o nonacute intracranial occlusions and near occlusions. Applications/LocalApps. NeuroSurg Focus. 2009; 26(3): E3.
  • Leifer D, Bravata DM, Connors JJ III, Hinchey JA, Jauch EC, Johnston SC, Latchaw R, Likosky W, Ogilvy C, Qureshi AI, Summers D, Sung GY, Williams LS, Zorowitz R, on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42; 857.
  • Menon BK, Saver JL, Prabhakaran S, Reeves M, Liang L, Olson DWM, Peterson ED, Hernandez AF, Fonarow GC, Schwamm LH, Smith EE. Risk score for intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator. Stroke. 2012;43: 1-9.
  • Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, Bonafe A, Budzik RF, Bhuva P, et. al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. NEJM. 2018;378(1): 11-21.
  • Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, Coffey CS, Jauch EC, Johnston KC, Johnston SC, Khalessi AA, Kidwell CS, Meschia JF, Ovbiagele B, Yavagal DR, on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2015 AHA/ASA focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46; 3021-3035.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e26-e30.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • Pride GL, Fraser JF, Gupta R, Alberts MJ, Rutledge JN, Fowler R, et. al. Prehospital care delivery and triage of stroke with emergent large vessel occlusion (LVO): report of the Standards and Guidelines Committee of the Society of Neurointerventional Surgery (SNIS). Applications/LocalApps. NeuroIntervent Surg. 2016;0:1-11.
  • Rha JH, Saver JL. The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke.
  • Sacks D, Black CM, Cognard C, Connors III JJ, Frei D, Gupta R, Jovin TG, Kluck B, Meyers PM, Murphy KJ, Ramee S, Rϋfenacht DA, Stallmeyer MJB, Vorwerk D. Multisociety consensus quality improvement guidelines for intraarterial catheter-directed treatment of acute ischemic stroke from the American Society of Neuroradiology, Canadian Interventional Radiology Association, Cardiovascular and interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy, and Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:151-163.
  • Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, et. al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. NEJM. 2015 Apr: 1-11.
  • Sharma VK, Teoh HL, Wong LYH, Su J, Ong BKC, and Chan BLP. Recanalization therapies in acute ischemic stroke: pharmacological agents, devices, and combinations. Stroke Research and Treatment. 2010.
  • Sims JR, Gharai R, Schaefer PW, Vangel M, Rosenthal ES, Lev MH, Schwamm LH. ABC/2 for rapid clinical estimate of infarct, perfusion, and mismatch volumes. Neurology. 2009;72:2104-2110.
  • Tomsick T, Broderick J, Carrosella J, Khatari P, Hill M, Palesch Y, Khoury J; Interventional Management of Stroke II Investigators. Revascularizaton results in the Interventional Management of Stroke II Trial. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2008 Mar; 29(3): 582-587.
  • Turk AS, Frei D, Fiorella D, Mocco J, Baxter B, Siddiqui A, et. al. ADAPT FAST study: a direct aspiration first pass technique for acute stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 May;694): 260-4.

Add:
  • Albers, G. W., Marks, M. P., Kemp, S., Christensen, S., Tsai, J. P., Ortega Gutierrez, S., et al. (2018). Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. The New England Journal of Medicine, 378 (8), 708–718.
  • Campbell, B. C. V., Mitchell, P. J., Kleinig, T. J., Dewey, H. M., Churilov, L., Yassi, N., et al. (2015). Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion imaging selection. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (11), 1009–1017.
  • Demchuk, A. M., Goyal, M., Menon, B. K., Eesa, M., Ryckborst, K. J., Kamal, N., et al. (2015). Endovascular treatment for small core and anterior circulation proximal occlusion with emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times (ESCAPE) trial: Methodology. International Journal of Stroke, 10 (3), 429–438.
  • English, J. D., Yavagal, D. R., Gupta, R., Janardhan, V., Zaidat, O. O., Xavier, A. R., Nogueira, R. G., Kirmani, J. F., & Jovin, T. G. (2015). Mechanical thrombectomy ready comprehensive stroke center requirements and endovascular stroke systems of care: Recommendations from the Endovascular Stroke Standards Committee of the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN). Interventional Neurology, 4, 138–150.
  • Leifer, D., Bravata, D. M., Connors, J. J., III, Hinchey, J. A., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, S. C., Latchaw, R., Likosky, W., Ogilvy, C., Qureshi, A. I., Summers, D., Sung, G. Y., Williams, L. S., & Zorowitz, R. (2011). Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: Detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 42, 853-54.
  • Menon, B. K., Saver, J. L., Prabhakaran, S., Reeves, M., Liang, L., Olson, D. W. M., Peterson, E. D., Hernandez, A. F., Fonarow, G. C., Schwamm, L. H., & Smith, E. E. (2012). Risk score for intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous tissue type plasminogen activator. Stroke, 43, 1–9.
  • Nogueira, R. G., Jadhav, A. P., Haussen, D. C., Bonafe, A., Budzik, R. F., Bhuva, P., et al. (2018). Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. The New England Journal of Medicine, 378 (1), 11–21.
  • Powers, W. J., Derdeyn, C. P., Biller, J., Coffey, C. S., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, K. C., Johnston, S. C., Khalessi, A. A., Kidwell, C. S., Meschia, J. F., Ovbiagele, B., & Yavagal, D. R., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2015). 2015 AHA/ASA focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 46, 3021–3035.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e26–e30.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
  • Prabhakaran, S., Gonzalez, N. R., Zachrison, K. S., Adeoye, O., Alexandrov, A. W., Ansari, S. A., Chapman, S., Czap, A. L., Dumitrascu, O. M., Ishida, K., Jadhav, A. P., Johnson, B., Johnston, K. C., Khatri, P., Kimberly, W. T., Lee, V. H., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Mac Grory, B., Madsen, T. E., Menon, B., Mistry, E. A., Park, S., Parker, S., Pérez de la Ossa, N., Reeves, M., Saiz, T., Scott, P. A., Schwartzberg, D., Sheth, S. A., Sporns, P. B., Times, S., Tjoumakaris, S., Wolfe, S. Q., & Yaghi, S.; Peer Review Committee Collaborators. (2026). 2026 guideline for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000513
  • Pride, G. L., Fraser, J. F., Gupta, R., Alberts, M. J., Rutledge, J. N., Fowler, R., et al. (2016). Prehospital care delivery and triage of stroke with emergent large vessel occlusion (LVO): Report of the Standards and Guidelines Committee of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS). Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 0, 1–11.
  • Saver, J. L., Goyal, M., Bonafe, A., Diener, H.-C., Levy, E. I., Pereira, V. M., et al. (2015). Stent retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t PA vs. t PA alone in stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (24), 2285–2295.

CSTK-12 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
The Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Reperfusion Grade is used to measure cerebral reperfusion. Results with this scoring system range between zero and three: 0 (no perfusion); 1 (perfusion past the initial occlusion, but no distal branch filling); 2 (perfusion with incomplete or slow distal branch filling); and, 3 (full perfusion with filling of all distal branches). Reperfusion past the target arterial occlusion and into the distal arterial bed and terminal branches, in conjunction with recanalization of the target arterial occlusion, demonstrates flow restoration or revascularization.

Endovascular therapy (EVT) is now the standard of care for treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO). In 2015, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association published a focused update to the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke regarding endovascular treatment (Powers WJ, et. al., 2015). Endovascular therapy with a stent retriever is recommended for eligible patients. The use of mechanical thrombectomy devices other than stent retrievers as first-line devices for mechanical thrombectomy may be reasonable in some circumstances, but stent retrievers remain the first choice (Powers WJ, et. al., 2018).

To ensure benefit, reperfusion to TICI 2B/3 should be achieved as early as possible and within 6 hours of stroke onset. The DAWN Clinical Trial Investigators (Nogueira RG, et. al., 2018) reported the benefits of mechanical thrombectomy in the extended window up to 24 hours of last known well for select patients meeting certain criteria. As with IV alteplase (t-PA), reduced time from symptom onset to reperfusion with EVT is highly associated with better clinical outcomes. Recent recommendations from the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN) offer procedural metrics which include time from hospital arrival to groin puncture less than 90 minutes, and time from groin puncture to TICI 2B or better or conclusion of procedure less than 60 minutes (English JD, et. al., 2016).

To:
The Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Reperfusion Grade is used to measure cerebral reperfusion. Results with this scoring system range between zero and three: 0 (no perfusion); 1 (perfusion past the initial occlusion, but no distal branch filling); 2 (perfusion with incomplete or slow distal branch filling); and, 3 (full perfusion with filling of all distal branches). Reperfusion past the target arterial occlusion and into the distal arterial bed and terminal branches, in conjunction with recanalization of the target arterial occlusion, demonstrates flow restoration or revascularization.

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with a stent retriever is the standard of care for treatment of acute ischemic stroke from anterior circulation proximal large-vessel occlusion (LVO), (Powers W.J., et al., 2018). Reperfusion to TICI 2B/3 should be achieved as early as possible, preferably within 6 hours of stroke onset. The DAWN Clinical Trial Investigators, (Nogueira R.G., et al., 2018), reported the benefits of mechanical thrombectomy in the extended window up to 24 hours of last known well for select patients meeting certain criteria. Time from stroke onset to hospital arrival , initial NIHSS score, prestroke mRS, ASPECTS, patient age, and other factors should be considerations when deciding a treatment window between 6 and 24 hours (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026). As with IV alteplase (t-PA), reduced time from symptom onset to reperfusion with EVT is highly associated with better clinical outcomes. Recommendations from the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN) offer procedural metrics which include time from hospital arrival to groin puncture less than 90 minutes, and time from groin puncture to TICI 2B or better or conclusion of procedure less than 60 minutes (English J.D., et al., 2016).

Selected References
Remove:
  • Adams HP, Brott TG, Furlan AJ, Gomez CR, Grotta J, Helgason CM, Kwiatkowski T, Lyden PD, Marler JR, Torner J, et. al. Guidelines for thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke: a supplement to the guidelines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Circulation. 1996;94:1167-1174.
  • Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, Christensen S, Tsai JP, Ortega-Gutierrez S, et. al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. NEJM. 2018;378(8): 708-718.
  • Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). 2004.
  • Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:210-—47.
  • Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, Dewey HM, Churilov L, Yassi N, et. al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. NEJM. 2015 Mar;372(11): 1009-17.
  • Demchuk AM, Goyal M, Monon BK, Eesa M, Ryckborst KJ, Kamal N, et. al. Endovascular treatment for Small Core and Anterior circulation Proximal occlusion with Emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times (ESCAPE) trial: methodology. Int J Stroke. 2015 Apr;10(3): 429-38.
  • English JD, Yavagal DR, Gupta R, Janardhan V, Zaidat OO, Xavier AR, Nogueira RG, Kirmani JF, Jovin TG. Mechanical thrombectomy-ready comprehensive stroke center requirements and endovascular stroke systems of care: recommendations from the endovascular stroke standards committee of the Society of Vascular and interventional Neurology (SVIN). Intervent Neurol. 2015;4:138-50.
  • Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM, Khatri P, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:32-36.
  • Khatari P, Abruzzo T, Yeatts SD, Nichols C, Broderick JP, Tomsick TA; IMS I and II Investigators. Good clinical outcome after ischemic stroke with successful revascularization is time-dependent. Neurology. 2009 Sep 29;73(13):1066-72.
  • Kole M, Amin B, Marin H, Russman A, Sanders W. Intracranial angioplasty and stent placement for direct cerebral revascularization o nonacute intracranial occlusions and near occlusions. Applications/LocalApps. NeuroSurg Focus. 2009; 26(3): E3.
  • Leifer D, Bravata DM, Connors JJ III, Hinchey JA, Jauch EC, Johnston SC, Latchaw R, Likosky W, Ogilvy C, Qureshi AI, Summers D, Sung GY, Williams LS, Zorowitz R, on behalf of the American Heart Association Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42; 857.
  • Menon BK, Saver JL, Prabhakaran S, Reeves M, Liang L, Olson DWM, Peterson ED, Hernandez AF, Fonarow GC, Schwamm LH, Smith EE. Risk score for intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator. Stroke. 2012;43: 1-9.
  • Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, Bonafe A, Budzik RF, Bhuva P, et. al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. NEJM. 2018;378(1): 11-21.
  • Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, Coffey CS, Jauch EC, Johnston KC, Johnston SC, Khalessi AA, Kidwell CS, Meschia JF, Ovbiagele B, Yavagal DR, on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2015 AHA/ASA focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46; 3021-3035.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e26-e30.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • Pride GL, Fraser JF, Gupta R, Alberts MJ, Rutledge JN, Fowler R, et. al. Prehospital care delivery and triage of stroke with emergent large vessel occlusion (LVO): report of the Standards and Guidelines Committee of the Society of Neurointerventional Surgery (SNIS). Applications/LocalApps. NeuroIntervent Surg. 2016;0:1-11.
  • Rha JH, Saver JL. The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke.
  • Sacks D, Black CM, Cognard C, Connors III JJ, Frei D, Gupta R, Jovin TG, Kluck B, Meyers PM, Murphy KJ, Ramee S, Rϋfenacht DA, Stallmeyer MJB, Vorwerk D. Multisociety consensus quality improvement guidelines for intraarterial catheter-directed treatment of acute ischemic stroke from the American Society of Neuroradiology, Canadian Interventional Radiology Association, Cardiovascular and interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy, and Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:151-163.
  • Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, et. al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. NEJM. 2015 Apr: 1-11.
  • Sharma VK, Teoh HL, Wong LYH, Su J, Ong BKC, and Chan BLP. Recanalization therapies in acute ischemic stroke: pharmacological agents, devices, and combinations. Stroke Research and Treatment. 2010.
  • Sims JR, Gharai R, Schaefer PW, Vangel M, Rosenthal ES, Lev MH, Schwamm LH. ABC/2 for rapid clinical estimate of infarct, perfusion, and mismatch volumes. Neurology. 2009;72:2104-2110.
  • Tomsick T, Broderick J, Carrosella J, Khatari P, Hill M, Palesch Y, Khoury J; Interventional Management of Stroke II Investigators. Revascularizaton results in the Interventional Management of Stroke II Trial. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2008 Mar; 29(3): 582-587.
  • Turk AS, Frei D, Fiorella D, Mocco J, Baxter B, Siddiqui A, et. al. ADAPT FAST study: a direct aspiration first pass technique for acute stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 May;694): 260-4.

Add:
  • Albers, G. W., Marks, M. P., Kemp, S., Christensen, S., Tsai, J. P., Ortega Gutierrez, S., et al. (2018). Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. The New England Journal of Medicine, 378 (8), 708–718.
  • Campbell, B. C. V., Mitchell, P. J., Kleinig, T. J., Dewey, H. M., Churilov, L., Yassi, N., et al. (2015). Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion imaging selection. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (11), 1009–1017.
  • Demchuk, A. M., Goyal, M., Menon, B. K., Eesa, M., Ryckborst, K. J., Kamal, N., et al. (2015). Endovascular treatment for small core and anterior circulation proximal occlusion with emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times (ESCAPE) trial: Methodology. International Journal of Stroke, 10 (3), 429–438.
  • English, J. D., Yavagal, D. R., Gupta, R., Janardhan, V., Zaidat, O. O., Xavier, A. R., Nogueira, R. G., Kirmani, J. F., & Jovin, T. G. (2015). Mechanical thrombectomy ready comprehensive stroke center requirements and endovascular stroke systems of care: Recommendations from the Endovascular Stroke Standards Committee of the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN). Interventional Neurology, 4, 138–150.
  • Leifer, D., Bravata, D. M., Connors, J. J., III, Hinchey, J. A., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, S. C., Latchaw, R., Likosky, W., Ogilvy, C., Qureshi, A. I., Summers, D., Sung, G. Y., Williams, L. S., & Zorowitz, R. (2011). Metrics for measuring quality of care in comprehensive stroke centers: Detailed follow-up to Brain Attack Coalition comprehensive stroke center recommendations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 42, 853-54.
  • Menon, B. K., Saver, J. L., Prabhakaran, S., Reeves, M., Liang, L., Olson, D. W. M., Peterson, E. D., Hernandez, A. F., Fonarow, G. C., Schwamm, L. H., & Smith, E. E. (2012). Risk score for intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous tissue type plasminogen activator. Stroke, 43, 1–9.
  • Nogueira, R. G., Jadhav, A. P., Haussen, D. C., Bonafe, A., Budzik, R. F., Bhuva, P., et al. (2018). Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. The New England Journal of Medicine, 378 (1), 11–21.
  • Powers, W. J., Derdeyn, C. P., Biller, J., Coffey, C. S., Jauch, E. C., Johnston, K. C., Johnston, S. C., Khalessi, A. A., Kidwell, C. S., Meschia, J. F., Ovbiagele, B., & Yavagal, D. R., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2015). 2015 AHA/ASA focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 46, 3021–3035.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e26–e30.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
  • Prabhakaran, S., Gonzalez, N. R., Zachrison, K. S., Adeoye, O., Alexandrov, A. W., Ansari, S. A., Chapman, S., Czap, A. L., Dumitrascu, O. M., Ishida, K., Jadhav, A. P., Johnson, B., Johnston, K. C., Khatri, P., Kimberly, W. T., Lee, V. H., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Mac Grory, B., Madsen, T. E., Menon, B., Mistry, E. A., Park, S., Parker, S., Pérez de la Ossa, N., Reeves, M., Saiz, T., Scott, P. A., Schwartzberg, D., Sheth, S. A., Sporns, P. B., Times, S., Tjoumakaris, S., Wolfe, S. Q., & Yaghi, S.; Peer Review Committee Collaborators. (2026). 2026 guideline for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000513
  • Pride, G. L., Fraser, J. F., Gupta, R., Alberts, M. J., Rutledge, J. N., Fowler, R., et al. (2016). Prehospital care delivery and triage of stroke with emergent large vessel occlusion (LVO): Report of the Standards and Guidelines Committee of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS). Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 0, 1–11.
  • Saver, J. L., Goyal, M., Bonafe, A., Diener, H.-C., Levy, E. I., Pereira, V. M., et al. (2015). Stent retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t PA vs. t PA alone in stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372 (24), 2285–2295.

HBIPS-2 Rationale updated to reflect updated references

Change from:

Mental health providers that value and respect an individual's autonomy, independence and safety seek to avoid the use of dangerous or restrictive interventions at all times (Donat, 2003).

To:

The use of restraints is increasingly viewed as an intervention of last resort and growing efforts to reduce the use of restraints emphasize preventing physical or psychological harm as well as ensuring the protection of patient autonomy and dignity (Wasser et al., 2023).

Change from:

Providers also seek to prevent violence or aggression from occurring in their treatment environments by focusing their attention on prevention activities that have a growing evidence base (Donat, 2003).

To:

In preventing escalations of violence or aggression, providers should employ a comprehensive initial and ongoing assessment including assessing risk for aggression using a standardized tool, ensure active patient participation in developing treatment plans and include interventions that have been successful in preventing escalation in the past (American Psychiatric Nurses Association [APNA], 2022).

Change from:

(APA, 2022)

To:

(American Psychiatric Association, 2022)

Selected references

Change from:

American Psychiatric Association. 2022. APA Resource Document: Seclusion and Restraint. http://apapsy.ch/S-R

To:

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). APA resource document: Seclusion and restraint. https://www.psychiatry.org/getattachment/e9b21b26-c933-4794-a3c4-01ad427eed91/Resource-Document-Seclusion-Restraint.pdf

Change from:

American Psychiatric Nurses Association. 2022. APNA Standards of Practice: Seclusion and Restraint. https://www.apna.org/standards-of-practice-seclusion-and-restraint/

To:

American Psychiatric Nurses Association. (2022). APNA standards of practice: Seclusion and restraint. https://www.apna.org/standards-of-practice-seclusion-and-restraint/

Add:

Wasser, T., Strockbine, B., Uyanwune, Y., & Kapoor, R. (2023). Restraint and seclusion practices and policies in U.S. forensic psychiatric hospitals. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 51 (4), 566–574. https://jaapl.org/content/51/4/566

Remove:

Donat, D. (August, 2003). An analysis of successful efforts to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint at a public psychiatric hospital. Psychiatric Services. 54(8): 1119-1123.

Remove:

Fisher, W. A. (2003). Elements of successful restraint and seclusion reduction programs and their application in a large, urban, state psychiatric hospital. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 9(1), 7-15.

Remove:

Mohr, W. K., & Anderson, J. A. (2001). Faulty assumptions associated with the use of restraints with children. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 14(3), 141- 151.

Remove:

Special Section on Seclusion and Restraint, (2005, Sept). Psychiatric Services, 56 (9), 1104-1142.

Remove:

Success Stories and Ideas for Reducing Restraint/Seclusion. (2003). A compendium of strategies created by the American Psychiatric Association (APA), the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (APNA), the National Association of Psychiatric Health Systems (NAPHS), and the American Hospital Association Section for Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Services (AHA). Retrieved from the Internet on February 10, 2010 at http://www.naphs.org
HBIPS-3 Rationale updated to reflect updated references Rationale

Change from:

Mental health providers that value and respect an individual's autonomy, independence and safety seek to avoid the use of dangerous or restrictive interventions at all times (Donat, 2003).

To:

The use of seclusion is increasingly viewed as an intervention of last resort and reducing the use of seclusion can align inpatient psychiatric care that values and respects patients’ rights and autonomy (Konnyu et al., 2023).

Change from:

Providers also seek to prevent violence or aggression from occurring in their treatment environments by focusing their attention on prevention activities that have a growing evidence base (Donat, 2003).

To:

In preventing escalations of violence or aggression, providers should employ a comprehensive initial and ongoing assessment including assessing risk for aggression using a standardized tool, ensure active patient participation in developing treatment plans and include interventions that have been successful in preventing escalation in the past (American Psychiatric Nurses Association [APNA], 2022).

Change from:

(APA, 2022)

To:

(American Psychiatric Association, 2022)

Selected references

Change from:

American Psychiatric Association. 2022. APA Resource Document: Seclusion and Restraint. http://apapsy.ch/S-R

To:

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). APA resource document: Seclusion and restraint. https://www.psychiatry.org/getattachment/e9b21b26-c933-4794-a3c4-01ad427eed91/Resource-Document-Seclusion-Restraint.pdf

Change from:

American Psychiatric Nurses Association. 2022. APNA Standards of Practice: Seclusion and Restraint. https://www.apna.org/standards-of-practice-seclusion-and-restraint/

To:

American Psychiatric Nurses Association. (2022). APNA standards of practice: Seclusion and restraint. https://www.apna.org/standards-of-practice-seclusion-and-restraint/

Add:

Konnyu, K., Quinn, M. K., Primack, J., Balk, E., Trikalinos, T. A., Rudolph, J. L., & Jutkowitz, E. (2023). Protocols to reduce seclusion in inpatient mental health units: A systematic review. Department of Veterans Affairs, Evidence Synthesis Program. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK599803

Remove:

Donat, D. (August, 2003). An analysis of successful efforts to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint at a public psychiatric hospital. Psychiatric Services. 54(8): 1119-1123.

Remove:

Fisher, W. A. (2003). Elements of successful restraint and seclusion reduction programs and their application in a large, urban, state psychiatric hospital. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 9(1), 7-15.

Remove:

Mohr, W. K., & Anderson, J. A. (2001). Faulty assumptions associated with the use of restraints with children. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 14(3), 141- 151.

Remove:

Special Section on Seclusion and Restraint, (2005, Sept). Psychiatric Services, 56 (9), 1104-1142.

Remove:

Success Stories and Ideas for Reducing Restraint/Seclusion. (2003). A compendium of strategies created by the American Psychiatric Association (APA), the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (APNA), the National Association of Psychiatric Health Systems (NAPHS), and the American Hospital Association Section for Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Services (AHA). Retrieved from the Internet on February 10, 2010 at http://www.naphs.org

IMM-2 Description and Rationale updated to reflect updated references Description

Change from:

Influenza activity most often peaks in February, but can peak rarely as early as November and as late as April.

To:

Influenza activity most often peaks in February, but can peak rarely as early as November and as late as April (Grohskopf et al., 2021).

Change from:

In order to protect as many people as possible before influenza activity increases, most flu vaccine is administered in September through November, but vaccine is recommended to be administered throughout the influenza season as well.

To:

In order to protect as many people as possible before influenza activity increases, most flu vaccine is administered in September through November, but vaccine is recommended to be administered throughout the influenza season as well (Grohskopf et al., 2025).

Rationale

Change from:

An estimated 9.3 to 41 million people in the United States get influenza every season.

To:

An estimated 9.3 to 51 million people in the United States get influenza every season (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2024a).

Change from:

Each year approximately 120,000 to 710,000 people in the US are hospitalized with complications from influenza and between 6,300 and 52,000 die from the disease and its complications (Center for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2024a).

To:

Each year approximately 120,000 to 710,000 people in the US are hospitalized with complications from influenza and between 6,300 and 52,000 die from the disease and its complications (CDC, 2024a).

Change from:

Combined with pneumonia, influenza is in the nation’s top 10 leading causes of death for ages 1 through 44 (CDC, 2023).

To:

In 2024, influenza, combined with pneumonia, is in the nation’s top 10 leading causes of death for ages 1 through 44 and those 65 and older (CDC, n.d.).

Change from:

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends seasonal influenza vaccination for all persons 6 months of age and older to highlight the importance of preventing influenza.

To:

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends seasonal influenza vaccination for all persons 6 months of age and older to highlight the importance of preventing influenza (Grohskopf et al., 2025).

Change from:

Screening and vaccination of inpatients is recommended, but hospitalization is an underutilized opportunity to provide vaccination to persons 6 months of age or older.

To:

Screening and vaccination of inpatients is recommended, but hospitalization is an underutilized opportunity to provide vaccination to persons 6 months of age or older (CDC, 2024c).

Selected references

Remove:

Benowitz I, Esposito DB, Gracey KD, Shapiro ED, Vazquez M. Influenza vaccine given to pregnant women reduces hospitalization due to influenza in their infants.CID. December 2010; 51 (12): 1355-1361.

Remove:

Carr S, Allison Kim J, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccines in children with cancer. J Infect Dis.2011:204:1475-1482.

Remove:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Estimated Influenza Illnesses and Hospitalizations Averted by Influenza Vaccination — United States,2012–13 Influenza Season. MMWR. 2013;62(49):997-1000.

Remove:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2017-2018. MMWR, August 17, 2017;62(RR07); 1-20.

Change from:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Leading causes of death. WISQARS. https://wisqars.cdc.gov/lcd/?o=LCD&y1=2023&y2=2023&ct=10&cc=ALL&g=00&s=0&r=0&ry=2&e=0&ar=lcd1age&at=groups&ag=lcd1age&a1=0&a2=199

To:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Leading causes of death, United States [WISQARS database]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved April 28, 2026, from https://wisqars.cdc.gov/lcd/

Change from:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024a). Frequently asked questions about estimating influenza burden. https://www.cdc.gov/flu-burden/php/about/faq.html

To:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024a, February 25). Frequently asked questions about estimating influenza burden. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/flu-burden/php/about/faq.html

Change from:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024b). 2023-2024 flu vaccines reduce medical visits. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/whats-new/2023-2024-vaccines-reduce-medical-visits.html

To:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024b, February 29). 2023-2024 flu vaccines reduce medical visits. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/whats-new/2023-2024-vaccines-reduce-medical-visits.html

Change from:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024, July 25). General best practices for immunization. Vaccines & immunizations. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-best-practices/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/general-recs/index.html

To:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024c, July 25). General best practices for immunization. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-best-practices/

Remove:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024, July 25). Contraindications and precautions. Vaccines & immunizations. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-best-practices/contraindications-precautions.html

Remove:

Chung EY, Huang L, and Schneider L. Safety of influenza vaccine administration in egg-allergic patients. Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1024-30. Epub 2010 Apr 5.

Remove:

Darvishiana M, Gefenaitea G, Turnerc RM, Pechlivanogloua P, Van der HoekeW, Van den Heuvelb ER, Haka E (2014). After adjusting for bias in meta-analysis seasonal influenza vaccine remains effective in community-dwelling elderly. JClin Epidemiol 2014;67:734-744.

Change from:

Grohskopf LA, Alyanak E, Ferdinands JM, et al. Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2021–22 Influenza Season. MMWR Recomm Rep 2021;70(No. RR-5):1–28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr7005a1

To:

Grohskopf, L. A., Alyanak, E., Ferdinands, J. M., Chung, J. R., Broder, K. R., Talbot, H. K., & Fry, A. M. (2021). Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2021–22 influenza season. MMWR Recommendations and Reports, 70(RR 5), 1–28.

Add:

Grohskopf, L. A., Blanton, L. H., Ferdinands, J. M., Reed, C., Dugan, V. G., & Daskalakis, D. C. (2025). Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, 2025–26 influenza season. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 74, 500–507. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7432a2

Remove:

Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueta A, Bartlett JG, Infectious Diseases Society of America; American Thoracic Society. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 March 1;44 Suppl2:S27-72.

Change from:

Naquin, A., O’Halloran, A., Ujamaa, D., et al. (2024). Laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations among children and adults — Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network, United States, 2010–2023. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 73(SS-6), 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss7706a1

To:

Naquin, A., O’Halloran, A., Ujamaa, D., Sundaresan, D., Masalovich, S., Cummings, C. N., Noah, K., Jain, S., Kirley, P. D., Alden, N. B., Austin, E., Meek, J., Yousey Hindes, K., Openo, K., Witt, L., Monroe, M. L., Henderson, J., Tellez Nunez, V., Lynfield, R., … Bozio, C. H. (2024). Laboratory confirmed influenza associated hospitalizations among children and adults — Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network, United States, 2010–2023. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 73(SS 6), 1–18.

Remove:

Nichol KL, Nordin J, Mullooly J, et al. Influenza Vaccination and Reduction in Hospitalizations for Cardiac Disease and Stroke among the Elderly. N Engl JMed. 2003;348:1322-1332.

Remove:

Rubin L, Levin M, Ljungman P, et al. 2013 IDSA clinical practice guideline for vaccination of the immunocompromised host. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(3):e44-100. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cit684

PC To better align with the eCQM and intent of the measure, the single live newborn code is being edited to be the Principal Diagnosis Code. Under Newborns Remove:

'or Other' from ICD-10-CM Principal or Other Diagnosis Code.
PC-02 Rationale updated to reflect updated references

Algorithm and narrative algorithm updated to align with clinical intent and the eCQM version of the measure.
Rationale

Change from:

The removal of any pressure to not perform a cesarean birth has led to a skyrocketing of hospital, state and national cesarean birth (CB) rates. Some hospitals’ CB rates were over 50%. Hospitals with CB rates at 15-20% have infant outcomes that are just as good and better maternal outcomes (Symum et al., 2023). There is no data that higher rates improve any outcomes, yet the CB rates continue to rise. This measure seeks to focus attention on the most variable portion of the CB epidemic, the term labor CB in nulliparous women. This population segment accounts for the large majority of the variable portion of the CB rate and is the area most affected by subjectivity.

As compared to other CB measures, what is different about NTSV CB rate (Primary CB in first births with term singleton pregnancies in head down position) is that there are clear cut quality improvement activities that can be done to address the differences. Main et al. (2012) found that over 60% of the variation among hospitals can be attributed to first birth labor induction rates and first birth early labor admission rates. The results showed if labor was forced when the cervix was not ready the outcomes were poorer. Rosenstein et al. (2021) also showed that labor and delivery guidelines can make a difference in labor outcomes. Many authors have shown that physician factors, rather than patient characteristics or obstetric diagnoses are the major driver for the difference in rates within a hospital (Berkowitz, et al.,1989; Goyert et al., 1989; Luthy et al., 2003, Symum et al., 2021). The dramatic variation in cesarean rates seen in all populations studied is striking. Cesarean rates varied tenfold in US hospitals nationwide across hospitals, from 7.1 % to 69.9 % and there was a 15-fold variation among low-risk women, from 2.4% to 36.5% (Kozhimannil et al., 2013).

A reduction in the number of nulliparous patients with live term singleton newborns in vertex position (NTSV) delivering by cesarean birth will result in increased patient safety, a substantial decrease in maternal and neonatal morbidity and substantial savings in health care costs. Successful quality improvement efforts incorporate audit and feedback strategies combined with provider and nurse education, guidelines and peer review.

The measure will assist health care organizations (HCOs) to track nulliparous patients with live term singleton newborns in vertex position delivering by cesarean birth to reduce the occurrence. Nulliparous women have 4-6 times the cesarean birth rate than multiparous women thus the NTSV population is the largest driver of primary cesarean birth rate (Sakala et al., 2020). NTSV has a large variation among facilities, thus identifying an important population on which to focus quality improvement efforts.

In accordance with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommendations (2020), cesarean delivery is indicated for patients with active genital lesions of genital herpes or prodromal symptoms (i.e., vulvar pain or burning at delivery) that may indicate viral shedding. Therefore, the measure will exclude encounters with a diagnosis of active genital herpes.

In addition, the accepted approach to treat placenta accreta spectrum, or the range of pathologic adherence of the placenta that includes placenta increta, placenta percreta, and placenta accreta, as well as placenta previa, is cesarean delivery (ACOG & Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), 2018). Vasa previa is an indication for cesarean delivery (SMFM Publications Committee, Sinkey, Odibo, & Dashe, 2015). Accordingly, placenta previa, vasa previa, and placenta accreta spectrum are all qualifying conditions to also be excluded from the measure.

Ultimately, a reduction in primary cesarean births will reduce the number of women having repeat cesarean births (almost 90% of mothers who have a primary cesarean birth will have subsequent cesarean birth (CDC, 2020)). Thus, improvement in the rates of cesarean birth for the first birth will reduce the morbidity of all future births and avoid all the controversies with trial of labor after cesarean/elective repeat cesareans.

To:

The removal of any pressure to not perform a cesarean birth has led to a skyrocketing of hospital, state and national cesarean birth (CB) rates. Some hospitals’ CB rates were over 50%. Hospitals with CB rates at 15% to 20% have infant outcomes that are just as good and better maternal outcomes (Symum & Zayas-Castro, 2023). There is no data that higher rates improve any outcomes, yet the CB rates continue to remain high. This measure seeks to focus attention on the most variable portion of the CB epidemic, the term labor CB in nulliparous patients. This population segment accounts for the large majority of the variable portion of the CB rate and is the area most affected by subjectivity.

As compared to other CB measures, what is different about Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex (NTSV) CB rate is that there are clear cut quality improvement activities that can be done to address the differences. Main et al. (2012) found that over 60% of the variation among hospitals can be attributed to first birth labor induction rates and first birth early labor admission rates. The results showed that if labor was forced when the cervix was not ready, the outcomes were poorer. Rosenstein et al. (2021) also showed if labor and delivery guidelines can make a difference in labor outcomes. Many authors have shown that physician factors, rather than patient characteristics or obstetric diagnoses are the major driver for the difference in rates within a hospital (Symum & Zayas-Castro, 2023). The dramatic variation in cesarean rates seen in all populations studied is striking. Cesarean rates varied tenfold in US hospitals nationwide across hospitals (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ], 2002), from 7.1% to 69.9%, and there was a 15-fold variation among low-risk women, from 2.4% to 36.5% (Kozhimannil et al., 2013).

A reduction in the number of NTSV patients delivering by cesarean birth will result in increased patient safety, a substantial decrease in maternal and neonatal morbidity and substantial savings in health care costs (Main et al., 2019). Successful quality improvement efforts incorporate audit and feedback strategies combined with provider and nurse education, guidelines and peer review.

The measure will assist health care organizations to track NTSV patients delivering by cesarean birth to reduce the occurrence. Nulliparous patients have 4-6 times the cesarean birth rate than multiparous patients, thus the NTSV population is the largest driver of primary cesarean birth rate (Sakala et al., 2020). NTSV has a large variation among facilities, thus identifying an important population on which to focus quality improvement efforts.

In accordance with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG, 2020) recommendations, cesarean delivery is indicated for patients with active genital lesions of genital herpes or prodromal symptoms (i.e., vulvar pain or burning at delivery) that may indicate viral shedding. Therefore, the measure will exclude encounters with a diagnosis of active genital herpes.

In addition, the accepted approach to treat placenta accreta spectrum, or the range of pathologic adherence of the placenta that includes placenta increta, placenta percreta, and placenta accreta, as well as placenta previa, is cesarean delivery (ACOG & Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), 2018). Vasa previa is an indication for cesarean delivery (SMFM Publications Committee et al., 2015). Accordingly, placenta previa, vasa previa, and placenta accreta spectrum are all qualifying conditions to also be excluded from the measure.

Ultimately, a reduction in primary cesarean births will reduce the number of patients having repeat cesarean births (almost 90% of mothers who have a primary cesarean birth will have subsequent cesarean birth [Osterman, 2020]). Thus, improvement in the rates of cesarean birth for the first birth will reduce the morbidity of all future births and avoid all the controversies with trial of labor after cesarean/elective repeat cesareans.

Selected References:

Change from:

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2002). AHRQ Quality Indicators Guide to Inpatient Quality Indicators: Quality of Care in Hospitals Volume, Mortality, and Utilization. Revision 4 (December 22, 2004). AHRQ Pub. No. 02-RO204.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2000). Task Force on Cesarean Delivery Rates. Evaluation of Cesarean Delivery. (Developed under the direction of the Task Force on Cesarean Delivery Rates, Roger K. Freeman, MD, Chair, Arnold W. Cohen, MD, Richard Depp III, MD, Fredric D. Frigoletto Jr, MD, Gary D.V. Hankins, MD, Ellice Lieberman, MD, DrPH, M. Kathryn Menard, MD, David A. Nagey, MD, Carol W. Saffold, MD, Lisa Sams, RNC, MSN and ACOG Staff: Stanley Zinberg, MD, MS, Debra A. Hawks, MPH, and Elizabeth Steele)
  • ACOG Practice Bulletin #220, Management of Genital Herpes in Pregnancy, May 2020
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, & Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (2018). Obstetric Care Consensus No. 7: Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Obstetrics and gynecology, 132(6), e259–e275.
  • Bailit, J.L., Garrett, J.M., Miller, W.C., McMahon, M.J., & Cefalo, R.C. (2002). Hospital primary cesarean delivery rates and the risk of poor neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 187(3):721-7.
  • Bailit, J. & Garrett, J. (2003). Comparison of risk-adjustment methodologies. Am J Obstet Gynecol.102:45-51.
  • Bailit, J.L., Love, T.E., & Dawson, N.V. (2006). Quality of obstetric care and risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol.194:402.
  • Bailit, J.L. (2007). Measuring the quality of inpatient obstetrical care. Ob Gyn Sur. 62:207-213.
  • Berkowitz, G.S., Fiarman, G.S., Mojica, M.A., et al. (1989). Effect of physician characteristics on the cesarean birth rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 161:146-9.
  • Center for Disease Control (2020). Recent trends in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: United States, 2016-2018. Retrieved from National Center for Health Statistics: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db359.htm
  • Cleary, R., Beard, R.W., Chapple, J., Coles, J., Griffin, M., & Joffe, M. (1996). The standard primipara as a basis for inter-unit comparisons of maternity care. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 103:223-9.
  • DiGiuseppe, D.L., Aron, D.C., Payne, S.M., Snow, R.J., Dieker, L., & Rosenthal, G.E. (2001). Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data. Health Serv Res.36:959-77.
  • Goyert, G.L., Bottoms, F.S., Treadwell, M.C., et al. (1989). The physician factor in cesarean birth rates. N Engl J Med.320:706-9.
  • Kozhimannil, K. B., Law, M. R., & Virnig, B. A. (2013). Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues. Health affairs (Project Hope), 32(3), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1030
  • Le Ray, C., Carayol, M., Zeitlin, J., Berat, G., & Goffinet, F. (2006). Level of perinatal care of the maternity unit and rate of cesarean in low-risk nulliparas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 107:1269-77.
  • Luthy, D.A., Malmgren, J.A., Zingheim, R.W., & Leininger, C.J. (2003). Physician contribution to a cesarean delivery risk model. Am J Obstet Gynecol.188:1579-85.
  • Main E.K., Bloomfield, L., & Hunt, G. (2004). Development of a large-scale obstetric quality-improvement program that focused on the nulliparous patient at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol.190:1747-58.
  • Main, E. K., Chang, S. C., Cape, V., Sakowski, C., Smith, H., & Vasher, J. (2019). Safety Assessment of a Large-Scale Improvement Collaborative to Reduce Nulliparous Cesarean Delivery Rates. Obstetrics and gynecology, 133(4), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003109
  • Main, E.K., Moore, D., Farrell, B., Schimmel, L.D., Altman, R.J., Abrahams, C., et al., (2006). Is there a useful cesarean birth measure? Assessment of the nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean birth rate as a tool for obstetric quality improvement. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 194:1644-51.
  • Main, E. K., Morton, C. H., Melsop, K., Hopkins, D., Giuliani, G., & Gould, J. B. (2012). Creating a public agenda for maternity safety and quality in cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology, 120(5), 1194–1198. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e31826fc13d
  • Romano, P.S., Yasmeen, S., Schembri, M.E., Keyzer, J.M., & Gilbert, W.M. (2005). Coding of perineal lacerations and other complications of obstetric care in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol.106:717-25.
  • Rosenstein, M. G., Chang, S. C., Sakowski, C., Markow, C., Teleki, S., Lang, L., Logan, J., Cape, V., & Main, E. K. (2021). Hospital Quality Improvement Interventions, Statewide Policy Initiatives, and Rates of Cesarean Delivery for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Births in California. JAMA, 325(16), 1631–1639. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.3816
  • Sakala, C., Belanoff, C., & Declercq, E. R. (2020). Factors Associated with Unplanned Primary Cesarean Birth: Secondary Analysis of the Listening to Mothers in California Survey. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 20(1), 462. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03095-4
  • Society of Maternal-Fetal (SMFM) Publications Committee, Sinkey, R. G., Odibo, A. O., & Dashe, J. S. (2015). SMFM consult series #37: Diagnosis and management of vasa previa. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 213(5), 615-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.031
  • Symum, H., & Zayas-Castro, J. L. (2021). A Multistate Decomposition Analysis of Cesarean Rate Variations, Associated Health Outcomes, and Financial Implications in the United States. American journal of perinatology, 10.1055/s-0041-1736538. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736538
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Reduce cesarean births among low-risk women with no prior births-MICH-06. Retrieved from Healthy People 2030: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/pregnancy-and-childbirth/reduce-cesarean-births-among-low-risk-women-no-prior-births-mich-06
  • Yasmeen, S., Romano, P.S., Schembri, M.E., Keyzer, J.M., & Gilbert, W.M. (2006). Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 194:992-1001.

To:

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2002). AHRQ quality indicators - Guide to inpatient quality indicators: Quality of care in hospitals - Volume, mortality, and utilization. (AHRQ Publication No. 02-RO204). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/inpatqi/iqi_guide.pdf
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, & Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. (2018). Obstetric care consensus no. 7: Placenta accreta spectrum. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 132 (6), e259–e275. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002983
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2014). ReVITALize: Obstetrics data definitions. https://www.acog.org/practice-management/health-it-and-clinical-informatics/revitalize-obstetrics-data-definitions
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2020). ACOG practice bulletin number 220: Management of genital herpes in pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 135 (5), 1236–1238. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003841
  • Kozhimannil, K. B., Law, M. R., & Virnig, B. A. (2013). Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues. Health Affairs, 32 (3), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1030
  • Main, E. K., Chang, S. C., Cape, V., Sakowski, C., Smith, H., & Vasher, J. (2019). Safety assessment of a large-scale improvement collaborative to reduce nulliparous cesarean delivery rates. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 133 (4), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003109
  • Main, E. K., Morton, C. H., Melsop, K., Hopkins, D., Giuliani, G., & Gould, J. B. (2012). Creating a public agenda for maternity safety and quality in cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 120 (5), 1194–1198. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e31826fc13d
  • Osterman, M. J. K. (2020). Recent trends in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: United States, 2016–2018 (NCHS Data Brief No. 359). National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db359.htm
  • Rosenstein, M. G., Chang, S. C., Sakowski, C., Markow, C., Teleki, S., Lang, L., Logan, J., Cape, V., & Main, E. K. (2021). Hospital quality improvement interventions, statewide policy initiatives, and rates of cesarean delivery for nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex births in California. JAMA, 325 (16), 1631–1639. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.3816
  • Sakala, C., Belanoff, C., & Declercq, E. R. (2020). Factors associated with unplanned primary cesarean birth: Secondary analysis of the Listening to Mothers in California Survey. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20 (1), 462. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03095-4
  • Society of Maternal-Fetal (SMFM) Publications Committee, Sinkey, R. G., Odibo, A. O., & Dashe, J. S. (2015). #37: Diagnosis and management of vasa previa. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 213 (5), 615-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.031
  • Symum, H., & Zayas-Castro, J. L. (2023). A multistate decomposition analysis of cesarean rate variations, associated health outcomes, and financial implications in the United States. American Journal of Perinatology, 40 (13), 1473-1483. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736538

Narrative algorithm:

Change From:

1. Start Cesarean birth logic. Run cases, which are included in the Perinatal Care Mother Initial Patient Population and pass the edits defined in the Clinical Data Processing Flow, through this measure.

2. Check ICD-10 CM Principal or Other Diagnosis codes
a. If at least one of the ICD-10 CM Principal or Other Diagnosis codes is on Table 11.09, the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of B and will not be in the Measure Population. Stop processing.
b. If all ICD-10 CM Principal or Other Diagnosis codes are missing or none of them on Table 11.09, continue processing and proceed to ICD-10 CM principal or Other Diagnosis Codes.

3. Check ICD-10 CM Principal or Other Diagnosis codes
a. If all ICD-10 CM Principal or Other Diagnosis codes are missing or none of them on Table 11.08, the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of B and will not be in the Measure Population. Stop processing.
b. If at least one of the ICD-10 CM Principal or Other Diagnosis codes is on Table 11.08, continue processing and proceed to check Gestational Age.

4. Check Gestational Age.
a. If the gestational age is missing the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of X and will be rejected. Stop processing.
b. If the gestational age is less than 37 weeks or unable to be determined the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of B and will not be in the Measure Population. Stop processing.
c. If the gestational age is greater than or equal to 37 weeks, continue processing and proceed to check Previous Births.

5. Check Previous Births.
a. If previous births is missing, the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of X and will be rejected. Stop processing.
b. If previous births is Yes, the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of B and will not be in the Measure Population. Stop processing.
c. If previous births is No continue processing and proceed to check ICD-10-PCS principal or other procedure codes.

6. Check ICD-10-PCS Principal or Other Procedure Codes
a. If all ICD-10-PCS Principal or Other Procedure Codes are missing or none of them on Table 11.06, the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of D and will be in the population. Stop processing.
b. If at least one of the ICD-10-PCS Principal or Other Procedure Codes is on Table 11.06, the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of E and will be in the numerator population. Stop processing.

To:

1. Start Cesarean birth logic. Run cases, which are included in the Perinatal Care Mother Initial Patient Population and pass the edits defined in the Clinical Data Processing Flow, through this measure.

2. Check ICD-10 CM Principal or Other Diagnosis codes
a. If all ICD-10 CM Principal or Other Diagnosis codes are missing or none of them on Table 11.08, the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of B and will not be in the Measure Population. Stop processing.
b. If at least one of the ICD-10 CM Principal or Other Diagnosis codes is on Table 11.08, continue processing and proceed to check Gestational Age.

3. Check Gestational Age.
a. If the gestational age is missing the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of X and will be rejected. Stop processing.
b. If the gestational age is less than 37 weeks or unable to be determined the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of B and will not be in the Measure Population. Stop processing.
c. If the gestational age is greater than or equal to 37 weeks, continue processing and proceed to check Previous Births.

4. Check Previous Births.
a. If previous births is missing, the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of X and will be rejected. Stop processing.
b. If previous births is Yes, the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of B and will not be in the Measure Population. Stop processing.
c. If previous births is No continue processing and proceed to check ICD-10-PCS principal or other procedure codes.

5. Check ICD-10-PCS Principal or Other Procedure Codes
a. If all ICD-10-PCS Principal or Other Procedure Codes are missing or none of them on Table 11.06, the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of D and will be in the population. Stop processing.
b. If at least one of the ICD-10-PCS Principal or Other Procedure Codes is on Table 11.06, continue processing and proceed to check ICD-10 CM Principal or Other Diagnosis codes.

6. Check ICD-10 CM Principal or Other Diagnosis codes
a. If at least one of the ICD-10 CM Principal or Other Diagnosis codes is on Table 11.09, the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of B and will not be in the Measure Population. Stop processing.
b. If all ICD-10 CM Principal or Other Diagnosis codes are missing or none of them on Table 11.09, the case will proceed to a Measure Category Assignment of E and will be in the numerator population. Stop processing.
PC-05 Rationale updated to reflect updated references Rationale

Change from:

Exclusive human milk feeding for the first 6 months of neonatal life has long been the expressed goal of World Health Organization (WHO), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). ACOG has recently reiterated its position (ACOG, 2018). A Cochrane review substantiates the benefits (Kramer et al., 2012). Much evidence has now focused on the prenatal and intrapartum period as critical for the success of exclusive (or any) human milk feeding (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2020; CDC, 2013; Petrova et al., 2007; Taveras et al., 2004). Exclusive human milk feeding rate during birth hospital stay has been calculated by the California Department of Public Health for the last several years using newborn genetic disease testing data. Healthy People 2020 and the CDC have also been active in promoting this goal.

To:

Exclusive human milk feeding for the first 6 months of neonatal life has long been the expressed goal of World Health Organization [WHO], 2007, Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). ACOG has recently reiterated its position (ACOG, 2018). A Cochrane review substantiates the benefits (Kramer & Kakuma, 2012). Much evidence has now focused on the prenatal and intrapartum period as critical for the success of exclusive (or any) human milk feeding (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2020; McGuire, 2014). Exclusive human milk feeding rate during birth hospital stay has been calculated by the California Department of Public Health (2020) for the last several years using newborn genetic disease testing data. Healthy People 2020 (National Center for Health Statistics, 2021) and the CDC have also been active in promoting this goal.

Selected References

Change from:

  • Kramer, M. S., & Kakuma, R. (2012). Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012(8), CD003517. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003517.pub2
  • Meek, J.Y., & Noble, L., Section on Breastfeeding; Policy Statement: Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk. American Academy of Pediatrics July 2022; 150 (1). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-057988
  • Perrine CG, Chiang KV, Anstey EH, et al. Implementation of Hospital Practices Supportive of Breastfeeding in the Context of COVID-19 — United States, July 15–August 20, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:1767–1770. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6947a3
  • Petrova, A., Hegyi, T., & Mehta, R. (2007). Maternal race/ethnicity and one-month exclusive breastfeeding in association with the in-hospital feeding modality. Breastfeeding Medicine. 2(2):92-8.
  • Taveras, E.M., Li, R., Grummer-Strawn, L., Richardson, M., Marshall, R., Rego, V.H., Miroshnik, I., & Lieu, T.A. (2004). Opinions and practices of clinicians associated with continuation of exclusive breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 113(4):e283-90.
  • US Department of Health and Human Services. (2020). Healthy People 2020 Final Review. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/healthy_people/hp2020-final-review.htm
  • World Health Organization. (2007). Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices. Washington, DC, USA: World Health Organization. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43895/1/9789241596664_eng.pdf

To:

PC-06 Rationale updated to reflect updated references Rationale

Change from:

The most important childbirth outcome for families is bringing home a healthy baby. While there have been measures developed to assess clinical practices and outcomes in preterm infants, there is a lack of metrics that assess the health outcomes of term infants who represent over 90% of all births. This measure addresses this gap and gauges adverse outcomes resulting in severe or moderate morbidity in otherwise healthy term infants without preexisting conditions. This measure also uses length of stay (LOS) modifiers to guard against overcoding and undercoding of diagnoses. Importantly, this metric also serves as a balancing measure for other maternal measures such as NTSV Cesarean rates and early elective delivery rates. The purpose of a balancing measure is to guard against any unanticipated or unintended consequences of quality improvement activities for these measures.

To:

The most important childbirth outcome for families is bringing home a healthy baby. While there have been measures developed to assess clinical practices and outcomes in preterm infants, there is a lack of metrics that assess the health outcomes of term infants who represent over 90% of all births. This measure addresses this gap and gauges adverse outcomes resulting in severe or moderate morbidity in otherwise healthy term infants without preexisting conditions (Fleischman, Oinuma, & Clark, 2010; Arham et al., 2025). This measure also uses length of stay (LOS) modifiers to guard against overcoding and undercoding of diagnoses. Importantly, this metric also serves as a balancing measure for other maternal measures such as Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex (NTSV) Cesarean rates and early elective delivery rates. The purpose of a balancing measure is to guard against any unanticipated or unintended consequences of quality improvement activities for these measures.

Selected References

Change from:

  • Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ et al. Births: Final data for 2010. National vital statistics reports; vol 61 no1. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for health Statistics. 2012
  • Russo, C. A (Thomson Reuters) and Andrews, R.M (AHRQ). Potentially Avoidable Injuries to mothers and Newborns During Childbirth, 2006. HCUP Statistical Brief # 74. June 2009. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Rockville, MD. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statsbriefs/sb74.pdf.
  • Gregory KD, Fridman M, Shah S et al. Global measures of quality and patient safety-related childbirth outcomes: should we monitor adverse or ideal rates? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:681.e1-681.e7.
  • Profit J, Zupancic JA, Gould JB et al. Implementing pay-for-performance in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2007;119:975-82
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Operative Vaginal Delivery. (2020). Practice Bulletin, Number 219. Obstetrics and gynecology,135(4), e149–e159. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003764
  • Practice Bulletin No 178: Shoulder Dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):e123-e133. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002043. PMID: 28426618.
  • Puopolo, K.M., Lynfield, R., & Cummings, J.J. (2019). Management of Infants at Risk for Group B Streptococcal Disease.American Academy of Pediatrics, 144 (2). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1881
  • Teitler, J. O., Plaza, R., Hegyi, T., Kruse, L., & Reichman, N. E. (2019). Elective deliveries and neonatal outcomes in full-term pregnancies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 188(4), 674–683. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwz014
  • Wilmink, F. A., Hukkelhoven, C. W., Lunshof, S., Mol, B. W., van der Post, J. A., & Papatsonis, D. N. (2010). Neonatal outcome following elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks of gestation: a 7-year retrospective analysis of a national registry. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 202(3), 250.e1–250.e2508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.052
  • Tita AT, Landon MB, Spong CY et al. Timing of Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery at Term and Neonatal Outcomes. N Engl J Med 2009;360(2):111-20
  • Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N. Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective cesarean section: cohort study. BMJ 2008;336:85
  • Spong CY. Defining “Term” pregnancy: Recommendations from the defining “term” pregnancy workgroup. JAMA. 2013 Jun 19;309(23):2445-6.
  • Zhang X and Kramer MS. Variations in Mortality and Morbidity by Gestational Age among Infants Born at Term. J Pediatr 2009;154:358-62
  • Fleischman AR, Oinuma M and Clark SL. Rethinking the Definition of “Term Pregnancy”. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116(1)136-139
  • Clark SL, Miller DD, Belfort MA, et al. Neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with elective term delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:156.e1-156.e4
  • Reddy UM, Bettegowda VR, Dias T et al. Term Pregnancy: A period of Heterogeneous Risk for Infant Mortality. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1279-1287
  • "Unexpected Complications in Term Newborns.” California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC), 2018, www.cmqcc.org/focus-areas/quality-metrics/unexpected-complications-term-newborns.

To:

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2017). Practice Bulletin No. 178: Shoulder dystocia. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 129 (5), e123–e133. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002043
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2020). Operative vaginal delivery (Practice Bulletin No. 219). Obstetrics & Gynecology, 135 (4), e149–e159. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003764
  • Arham, M., & Wróblewska Seniuk, K. (2025). Short and long term consequences of late preterm and early term birth. Children, 12 (7), 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12070907
  • California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative. (n.d.). Unexpected complications in term newborns. Retrieved March 30, 2026, from https://www.cmqcc.org/focus-areas/quality-metrics/unexpected-complications-term-newborns
  • Clark, S. L., Miller, D. D., Belfort, M. A., Dildy, G. A., Frye, D. K., & Meyers, J. A. (2009). Neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with elective term delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 200 (2), 156.e1–156.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.068
  • Fleischman, A. R., Oinuma, M., & Clark, S. L. (2010). Rethinking the definition of “term pregnancy.” Obstetrics & Gynecology, 116 (1), 136–139. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e24f28
  • Gregory, K. D., Fridman, M., Shah, S., & Korst, L. M. (2009). Global measures of quality and patient safety related childbirth outcomes: Should we monitor adverse or ideal rates? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 200 (6), 681.e1–681.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.033
  • Hansen, A. K., Wisborg, K., Uldbjerg, N., & Henriksen, T. B. (2008). Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective cesarean section: Cohort study. BMJ, 336 (7635), 85–87. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39405.539282.be
  • Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Ventura, S. J., Osterman, M. J. K., Wilson, E. C., & Mathews, T. J. (2012). Births: Final data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Reports, 61 (1), 1–72.
  • Profit, J., Zupancic, J. A., Gould, J. B., & Petersen, L. A. (2007). Implementing pay for performance in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics, 119 (5), 975–982. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1565
  • Puopolo, K. M., Lynfield, R., Cummings, J. J., Committee on Fetus and Newborn, & Committee on Infectious Diseases. (2019). Management of infants at risk for group B streptococcal disease. Pediatrics, 144 (2). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1881
  • Reddy, U. M., Bettegowda, V. R., Dias, T., Yamada Kushnir, T., Ko, C. W., & Willinger, M. (2011). Term pregnancy: A period of heterogeneous risk for infant mortality. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 117 (6), 1279–1287. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182179e28
  • Spong, C. Y. (2013). Defining “term” pregnancy: Recommendations from the Defining “Term” Pregnancy Workgroup. Journal of the American Medical Association, 309 (23), 2445–2446. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.6235
  • Teitler, J. O., Plaza, R., Hegyi, T., Kruse, L., & Reichman, N. E. (2019). Elective deliveries and neonatal outcomes in full-term pregnancies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 188 (4), 674–683. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwz014
  • Tita, A. T. N., Landon, M. B., Spong, C. Y., Lai, Y., Leveno, K. J., Varner, M. W., Moawad, A. H., Caritis, S. N., Meis, P. J., Wapner, R. J., Sorokin, Y., Miodovnik, M., Carpenter, M., Peaceman, A. M., O’Sullivan, M. J., Sibai, B. M., Langer, O., Thorp, J. M., Ramin, S. M., & Mercer, B. M. (2009). Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine, 360 (2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0803267
  • Wilmink, F. A., Hukkelhoven, C. W., Lunshof, S., Mol, B. W., van der Post, J. A., & Papatsonis, D. N. (2010). Neonatal outcome following elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks of gestation: A 7 year retrospective analysis of a national registry. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 202 (3), 250.e1–250.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.052
  • Zhang, X., & Kramer, M. S. (2009). Variations in mortality and morbidity by gestational age among infants born at term. Journal of Pediatrics, 154 , 358–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.09.013

STK-1 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
Stroke patients are at increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). One study noted proximal deep vein thrombosis in more than a third of patients with moderately severe stroke. Reported rates of occurrence vary depending on the type of screening used. Prevention of VTE, through the use of prophylactic therapies, in at risk patients is a noted recommendation in numerous clinical practice guidelines. For acutely ill stroke patients who are confined to bed, thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), low-dose unfractionated heparin (LDUH), or fondaparinux is recommended if there are no contraindications. Aspirin alone is not recommended as an agent to prevent VTE.

To:
Stroke patients are at increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Reported rates of occurrence vary depending on the type of screening used with approximately 7% pooled prevalence (mixed symptomatic + screened cases) in modern meta analyses, (Yang, Y., et al., 2025). Severe strokes, immobile patients, older, and untreated patients are at higher risk. Prevention of VTE, through the use of prophylactic therapies, in at risk patients is a noted recommendation in numerous clinical practice guidelines.

In patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and impaired mobility, intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) or prophylactic low-dose subcutaneous heparin (UFH or LMWH) are recommended options to reduce the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), unless contraindications exist. Elastic compression stockings or graduated compression stockings (GCS) are not recommended and may be harmful, resulting in skin breakdown, ulceration, and tissue necrosis (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026). Mechanical or pharmacological VTE prophylaxis are also recommended for patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), (Greenberg, S., et al.,2022), and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) whose aneurysm has been repaired (Hoh, B., et al., 2023). Aspirin alone is not recommended as an agent to prevent VTE.

Selected References:
Remove:
  • Adams, H.P., G. del Zoppo, M. J. Alberts, D. L. Bhatt, L. Brass, A. Furlan, R. L. Grubb, et al. "Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults with Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups." Stroke 38 (2007): 1655-711.
  • Albers, G. W, P Amarenco, J. D. Easton, R. L. Sacco, and P. Teal. "Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke." Chest 119 (2001): 300-20.
  • Caprini, J. A., and J. I. Arcelus. "State-of the Art Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis." SCOPE on Phlebology & Lymphology 1 (2005): 228-40.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Prevalence and Most Common Causes of Disability among Adults--United States, 2005." [In eng]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58, no. 16 (May 1 2009): 421-6.
  • Coull, B. M., L. S. Williams, L. B. Goldstein, J. F. Meschia, D. Heitzman, S. Chaturvedi, K. C. Johnston, et al. "Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet Agents in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Report of the Joint Stroke Guideline Development Committee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Stroke Association (a Division of the American Heart Association)." [In eng]. Stroke 33, no. 7 (Jul 2002): 1934-42.
  • Desmukh, M., M. Bisignami, P. Landau, and T. J. Orchard. "Deep Vein Thrombosis in Rehabilitating Stroke Patients: Incidence, Risk Factors and Prophylaxis." American Journal Physical Medicine Rehabilitation 70 (1991): 313-16.
  • Duncan, P. W., R. Zorowitz, B. Bates, J. Y. Choi, J. J. Glasberg, G. D. Graham, R. C. Katz, K. Lamberty, and D. Reker. "Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: A Clinical Practice Guideline." [In eng]. Stroke 36, no. 9 (Sep 2005): e100-43.
  • Geerts, W. H., D. Bergqvist, G. F. Pineo, J. A. Heit, C. M. Samama, M. R. Lassen, C. W. Colwell, and Physicians American College of Chest. "Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)." [In eng]. Chest 133, no. 6 Suppl (Jun 2008): 381S-453S.
  • Geerts, W. H., J. A. Heit, G. P. Clagett, G. F. Pineo, C. W. Colwell, F. A. Anderson, Jr., and H. B. Wheeler. "Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism." [In eng]. Chest 119, no. 1 Suppl (Jan 2001): 132S-75S.
  • Geerts, W. H., G. F. Pineo, J. A. Heit, D. Bergqvist, M. R. Lassen, C. W. Colwell, and J. G. Ray. "Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: The Seventh Accp Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy." [In eng]. Chest 126, no. 3 Suppl (Sep 2004): 338S-400S.
  • Greenberg, S. M., Ziai, W. C., Cordonnier, C., Dowlatshahi, D., Francis, B., Goldstein, J. N., Hemphill, J. C. III, Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Mack, W.J., Mocco, J., Newton, E. J., Ruff, I. M., Sansing, L. H., Schulman, S., Selim, M. H., Sheth, K. N., Sprigg, N., Sunnerhagen, K. S. "2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In Eng]. Stroke 53, no. 7 (Jul 2022): e282-e361.
  • Gresham, G. E., P. W. Duncan, W. B. Stason, H. P. Adams, A. M. Adelman, D. N. Alexander, D. S. Bishop et al. "Post-stroke rehabilitation. Clinical practice guideline, no. 16. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services." Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (1995): 95-0062.
  • Guyatt, G. H., E. A. Akl, M. Crowther, D. D. Gutterman, H. J. Schuunemann, Therapy American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic, and Panel Prevention of Thrombosis. "Executive Summary: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th Ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines." [In eng]. Chest 141, no. 2 Suppl (Feb 2012): 7S-47S.
  • Heit, J. A. "The Epidemiology of Venous Thromboembolism in the Community." [In eng]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 28, no. 3 (Mar 2008): 370-2.
  • Jauch, E. C., J. L. Saver, H. P. Adams, Jr., A. Bruno, J. J. Connors, B. M. Demaerschalk, P. Khatri, et al. "Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In Eng]. Stroke (Jan 31 2013).
  • Kase, C. S., G. W. Albers, C. Bladin, C. Fieschi, A. A. Gabbai, W. O'Riordan, G. F. Pineo, and Prevail Investigators. "Neurological Outcomes in Patients with Ischemic Stroke Receiving Enoxaparin or Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: Subanalysis of the Prevention of Vte after Acute Ischemic Stroke with Lmwh (Prevail) Study." [In eng]. Stroke 40, no. 11 (Nov 2009): 3532-40.
  • Kase, C. S., and G. F. Pineo. "Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism after Ischemic Stroke." [In eng]. Curr Opin Pulm Med 14, no. 5 (Sep 2008): 389-96.
  • Kelly, J., A. Rudd, R. Lewis, and B. J. Hunt. "Venous Thromboembolism after Acute Stroke." [In eng]. Stroke 32, no. 1 (Jan 2001): 262-7.
  • Kelly, J., A. Rudd, R. R. Lewis, C. Coshall, A. Moody, and B. J. Hunt. "Venous Thromboembolism after Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Study Using Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging." [In eng]. Stroke 35, no. 10 (Oct 2004): 2320-5.
  • Kucher, N., S. Koo, R. Quiroz, J. M. Cooper, M. D. Paterno, B. Soukonnikov, and S. Z. Goldhaber. "Electronic Alerts to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism among Hospitalized Patients." [In eng]. N Engl J Med 352, no. 10 (Mar 10 2005): 969-77.
  • "Making Healthcare Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices.". In Evidence Report/Technology Assessment # 43. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, July 2001.
  • Michota, F. A. "Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Medical Patients." [In eng]. Curr Opin Cardiol 19, no. 6 (Nov 2004): 570-4.
  • Naccarato, M., F. Chiodo Grandi, M. Dennis, and P. A. Sandercock. "Physical Methods for Preventing Deep Vein Thrombosis in Stroke." [In eng]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, no. 8 (2010): CD001922.
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and National Institutes of Health. "Stroke Belt Initiative: Project Accomplishments and Lessons Learned." (1996).
  • Pineo, G., J. Lin, L. Stern, T. Subrahmanian, and L. Annemans. "Economic Impact of Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Hospital Perspective of the Prevail Trial." [In eng]. J Hosp Med 7, no. 3 (Mar 2012): 176-82.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e37-e38.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • Qaseem A., R. Chou, L. L. Humphrey, M. Starkey, P. Shekelle. “Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis In Hospitalized Patients: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians.” [In eng]. Ann Intern Med 155, no. 9 (Nov 2011): 625-32.
  • Raskob, G. E., R. Silverstein, D. W. Bratzler, J. A. Heit, and R. H. White. "Surveillance for Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism: Recommendations from a National Workshop." [In eng]. Am J Prev Med 38, no. 4 Suppl (Apr 2010): S502-9.
  • Roger, V. L., A. S. Go, D. M. Lloyd-Jones, E. J. Benjamin, J. D. Berry, W. B. Borden, D. M. Bravata, et al. "Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2012 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association." [In eng]. Circulation 125, no. 1 (Jan 3 2012): e2-e220.
  • Sacco, R. L., R. Adams, G. Albers, M. J. Alberts, O. Benavente, K. Furie, L. B. Goldstein, et al. "Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: Co-Sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: The American Academy of Neurology Affirms the Value of This Guideline." [In eng]. Stroke 37, no. 2 (Feb 2006): 577-617.
  • Sandercock, P. A., C. Counsell, and M. C. Tseng. "Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins or Heparinoids Versus Standard Unfractionated Heparin for Acute Ischaemic Stroke ". Cochrane Database Syst Rev, no. 3 (2011): CD000119.
  • Stein, P. D., and F. Matta. "Epidemiology and Incidence: The Scope of the Problem and Risk Factors for Development of Venous Thromboembolism." [In eng]. Clin Chest Med 31, no. 4 (Dec 2010): 611-28.
  • Vergouwen, M. D., Y. B. Roos, and P. W. Kamphuisen. "Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Treatment in Patients with Acute Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury." [In eng]. Curr Opin Crit Care 14, no. 2 (Apr 2008): 149-55.
  • Warlow, C., D. Ogston, and A. S. Douglas. "Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Legs after Strokes. Part I--Incidence and Predisposing Factors." [In eng]. Br Med J 1, no. 6019 (May 15 1976): 1178-81.
  • Wijdicks, E. F., and J. P. Scott. "Pulmonary Embolism Associated with Acute Stroke." [In eng]. Mayo Clin Proc 72, no. 4 (Apr 1997): 297-300.

Add:
  • Greenberg, S. M., Ziai, W. C., Cordonnier, C., Dowlatshahi, D., Francis, B., Goldstein, J. N., Hemphill, J. C., III, Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Mack, W. J., Mocco, J., Newton, E. J., Ruff, I. M., Sansing, L. H., Schulman, S., Selim, M. H., Sheth, K. N., Sprigg, N., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2022). 2022 guideline for the management of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 53 (7), e325–e326.
  • Hoh, B. L., Ko, N. U., Amin-Hanjani, S., Chou, S. H.-Y., Cruz-Flores, S., Dangayach, N. S., Derdeyn, C. P., Du, R., Hänggi, D., Hetts, S. W., Ifejika, N. L., Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Lucke-Wold, B., Rabinstein, A. A., Robicsek, S. A., Stapleton, C. J., Suarez, J. I., … Welch, B. G. (2023). 2023 guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 54, e321. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.000000000000043.
  • Kearon, C., Akl, E. A., Comerota, A. J., Prandoni, P., Bounameaux, H., Goldhaber, S. Z., Nelson, M. E., Wells, P. S., Gould, M. K., Dentali, F., Crowther, M., & Kahn, S. R. (2012). Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest, 141 (2 Suppl), e419S–e496S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-2301.
  • Kearon, C., Akl, E. A., Ornelas, J., Blaivas, A., Jimenez, D., Bounameaux, H., Huisman, M., King, C. S., Morris, T. A., Sood, N., Stevens, S. M., Vintch, J. R. E., Wells, P., Woller, S. C., & Moores, L. (2016). Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest, 149 (2), 315–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2015.11.026
  • Maynard, G. (2016). Preventing hospital-associated venous thromboembolism: A guide for effective quality improvement. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
  • Prabhakaran, S., Gonzalez, N. R., Zachrison, K. S., Adeoye, O., Alexandrov, A. W., Ansari, S. A., Chapman, S., Czap, A. L., Dumitrascu, O. M., Ishida, K., Jadhav, A. P., Johnson, B., Johnston, K. C., Khatri, P., Kimberly, W. T., Lee, V. H., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Mac Grory, B., Madsen, T. E., Menon, B., Mistry, E. A., Park, S., Parker, S., Pérez de la Ossa, N., Reeves, M., Saiz, T., Scott, P. A., Schwartzberg, D., Sheth, S. A., Sporns, P. B., Times, S., Tjoumakaris, S., Wolfe, S. Q., & Yaghi, S.; Peer Review Committee Collaborators. (2026). 2026 guideline for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000513
  • Schünemann, H. J., Cushman, M., Burnett, A. E., Kahn, S. R., Beyer-Westendorf, J., Spencer, F. A., Rezende, S. M., Zakai, N. A., Bauer, K. A., Dentali, F., Lansing, J., Balduzzi, S., Darzi, A., Morgano, G. P., Neumann, I., Nieuwlaat, R., Yepes-Nuñez, J. J., Zhang, Y., & Wiercioch, W. (2018). American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: Prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients. Blood Advances, 2 (22), 3198–3225. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2018022954
  • Stevens, S. M., Woller, S. C., Baumann Kreuziger, L., Bounameaux, H., Doerschug, K., Geersing, G.-J., Huisman, M. V., Kearon, C., King, C. S., Knighton, A. J., Lake, E., Murin, S., Vintch, J. R. E., Wells, P. S., & Moores, L. K. (2021). Executive summary: Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Second update of the CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest, 160 (6), 2247–2259.
  • Yang, Y., Chen, D., & Bhaskar, S. M. M. (2025). Incidence, risk factors, and prevention of deep vein thrombosis in acute ischemic stroke patients (IRIS-DVT study): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical and Translational Neuroscience, 9 (4), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/ctn9040049

STK-10 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
Each year about 700,000 people experience a new or recurrent stroke, which is the nation's third leading cause of death. Approximately two thirds of these individuals survive and require rehabilitation. Stroke is a leading cause of serious, long-term disability in the United States, with about 4.4 million stroke survivors alive today. Forty percent of stroke patients are left with moderate functional impairment and 15 to 30 percent with severe disability. More than 60% of those who have experienced stroke, serious injury, or a disabling disease have never received rehabilitation. Stroke rehabilitation should begin as soon as the diagnosis of stroke is established and life-threatening problems are under control. Among the high priorities for stroke are to mobilize the patient and encourage resumption of self-care activities as soon as possible. A considerable body of evidence indicates better clinical outcomes when patients with stroke are treated in a setting that provides coordinated, multidisciplinary stroke-related evaluation and services. Effective rehabilitation interventions initiated early following stroke can enhance the recovery process and minimize functional disability. The primary goal of rehabilitation is to prevent complications, minimize impairments, and maximize function.

To:
Each year about 795,000 people experience a new or recurrent stroke, which is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. Of all strokes, 87% are ischemic, 10% intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and 3% subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Prevalence (median 3.0%) increases with age for both males and females. Stroke is a leading cause of serious, long-term disability in the United States, with about 9.0 million stroke survivors alive today, (Palaniappan, L., et al., 2026). More than 50% of survivors 65 years and older experience impaired mobility after a stroke. Between 2019 and 2020 the economic burden of stroke in the U.S. exceeded $56 billion, including the cost of health care services, medicines to treat stroke, and missed days of work, (CDC, 2024).

Approximately two thirds of stroke survivors require rehabilitation (Winstein, C., et al., 2016); however, many patients never receive these services. High priorities include early mobilization and resumption of self-care activities as soon as possible after stroke. A considerable body of evidence indicates better clinical outcomes when patients with stroke are treated in a setting that provides coordinated, interdisciplinary stroke-related evaluation and services. Evaluation of a stroke survivor’s rehabilitation needs is best performed by a team that can include a physician with expertise in rehabilitation, nurses, physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech/language therapists, psychologists, and orthotists, (Ibid., 2016)). Assessment using a comprehensive, standardized tool, such as the Barthel Index or the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), is recommended. A post-acute care assessment is also beneficial when determining long-term functional outcomes, (Ibid., 2016). Effective rehabilitation interventions initiated early following stroke can enhance the recovery process and minimize functional disability. The primary goal of rehabilitation is to prevent complications, minimize impairments, and maximize function.

In patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), a formal, individualized, interdisciplinary assessment of the patient’s rehabilitation needs should be completed during the inpatient hospitalization, (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026). Early assessment and implementation of mild activity, such as range of motion (ROM), within 24-48 hours is recommended for patients with moderate ICH, but aggressive mobilization should be avoided and could worsen 14-day mortality, (Greenberg, S., et al., 2022). Validated scoring tools or patient-reported outcome measures can screen for physical, cognitive, behavioral, and quality of life (QOL) deficits prior to discharge, (Hoh, B., et al., 2023).

Selected References
Remove:
  • Bates, B., J. Y. Choi, P. W. Duncan, J. J. Glasberg, G. D. Graham, R. C. Katz, K. Lamberty, et al. "Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: Executive Summary." [In eng]. Stroke 36, no. 9 (Sep 2005): 2049-56.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Prevalence and Most Common Causes of Disability among Adults--United States, 2005." [In eng]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58, no. 16 (May 1 2009): 421-6.
  • Duncan, P. W., R. Zorowitz, B. Bates, J. Y. Choi, J. J. Glasberg, G. D. Graham, R. C. Katz, K. Lamberty, and D. Reker. "Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: A Clinical Practice Guideline." [In eng]. Stroke 36, no. 9 (Sep 2005): e100-43.
  • Foley, N., R. Teasell, S. Bhogal, and M. Speechley. "The Efficacy of Stroke Rehabilitation." In, (2011): 1-50.
  • http://www.ebrsr.com/evidence-review/5-efficacy-stroke-rehabilitation
  • Greenberg, S. M., Ziai, W. C., Cordonnier, C., Dowlatshahi, D., Francis, B., Goldstein, J. N., Hemphill, J. C. III, Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Mack, W.J., Mocco, J., Newton, E. J., Ruff, I. M., Sansing, L. H., Schulman, S., Selim, M. H., Sheth, K. N., Sprigg, N., Sunnerhagen, K. S. "2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In Eng]. Stroke 53, no. 7 (Jul 2022): e282-e361.
  • Gresham, G. E., P. W. Duncan, W. B. Stason, H. P. Adams, A. M. Adelman, D. N. Alexander, D. S. Bishop et al. "Post-stroke rehabilitation. Clinical practice guideline, no. 16. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services." Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (1995): 95-0062.
  • Kalra, L., A. Evans, I. Perez, M. Knapp, C. Swift, and N. Donaldson. "A Randomised Controlled Comparison of Alternative Strategies in Stroke Care." [In eng]. Health Technol Assess 9, no. 18 (May 2005): iii-iv, 1-79.
  • Keith, R. A. "Rehabilitation after Stroke: Cost-Effectiveness Analyses." [In eng]. J R Soc Med 89, no. 11 (Nov 1996): 631-3.
  • Langhorne, P., B. O. Williams, W. Gilchrist, and K. Howie. "Do Stroke Units Save Lives?" [In eng]. Lancet 342, no. 8868 (Aug 14 1993): 395-8.
  • "Management of Patients with Stroke: Rehabilitation, Prevention and Management of Complications, and Discharge Planning. A National Clinical Guideline." In, (2002). http://www.nhsggc.org.uk/content/mediaassets/pdf/HSD/sign64.pdf.
  • Management of Stroke Rehabilitation Working Group. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the management of stroke rehabilitation. Washington (DC): Veterans Health Administration, Department of Defense; 2010.
  • Moodie, M., D. Cadilhac, D. Pearce, C. Mihalopoulos, R. Carter, S. Davis, G. Donnan, and Scopes Study Group. "Economic Evaluation of Australian Stroke Services: A Prospective, Multicenter Study Comparing Dedicated Stroke Units with Other Care Modalities." [In eng]. Stroke 37, no. 11 (Nov 2006): 2790-5.
  • Noorani, H. Z., B. Brady, L. McGahan, R. Teasell, B. Skidmore, and T. J. Doherty. "Stroke Rehabilitation Services: Systematic Reviews of the Clinical and Economic Evidence." In Ottawa: Canadian Coordinating, Office for Health Technology Assessment, 2003.
  • Ottenbacher, K. J., and S. Jannell. "The Results of Clinical Trials in Stroke Rehabilitation Research." [In eng]. Arch Neurol 50, no. 1 (Jan 1993): 37-44.
  • "Outcomes in Stroke Rehabilitation." Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 12, no. 4 (Fall 2005): 1-10, 11-19, 20-27, 28-36, 37-49.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e39.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • "Rehabilitation Helps Stroke Patients Recover Skills ". American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, http://www.aapmr.org/patients/conditions/neurologic/Pages/recover.aspx.
  • Saka, O., V. Serra, Y. Samyshkin, A. McGuire, and C. C. Wolfe. "Cost-Effectiveness of Stroke Unit Care Followed by Early Supported Discharge." [In eng]. Stroke 40, no. 1 (Jan 2009): 24-9.
  • Stroke, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and. "Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Fact Sheet." http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/stroke/poststrokerehab.htm.
  • "Urgency Key but Perseverance Pays Off." American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. http://www.zoominfo.com/CachedPage/?archive_id=0&page_id=389260562&page_url=//www.aapmr.org/condtreat/rehab/strokeusa.htm&page_last_updated=2010-07-28T02:27:25&firstName=Charles&lastName=Levy

Add:
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024, October 24). Stroke facts. https://www.cdc.gov/stroke/data-research/facts-stats/index.html
  • Greenberg, S. M., Ziai, W. C., Cordonnier, C., Dowlatshahi, D., Francis, B., Goldstein, J. N., Hemphill, J. C., III, Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Mack, W. J., Mocco, J., Newton, E. J., Ruff, I. M., Sansing, L. H., Schulman, S., Selim, M. H., Sheth, K. N., Sprigg, N., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2022). 2022 guideline for the management of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 53 (7), e325–e326.
  • Hoh, B. L., Ko, N. U., Amin-Hanjani, S., Chou, S. H.-Y., Cruz-Flores, S., Dangayach, N. S., Derdeyn, C. P., Du, R., Hänggi, D., Hetts, S. W., Ifejika, N. L., Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Lucke-Wold, B., Rabinstein, A. A., Robicsek, S. A., Stapleton, C. J., Suarez, J. I., … Welch, B. G. (2023). 2023 guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 54, e321. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.000000000000043.
  • Palaniappan, L. P., Allen, N. B., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., Avery, C. L., Baker-Smith, C. M., Bansal, N., Currie, M. E., Earlie, R. S., Fan, W., Fetterman, J. L., Barone Gibbs, B., Heard, D. G., Hiremath, S., Hong, H., Hyacinth, H. I., Ibeh, C., Jiang, T., … Khan, S. S. (2026). 2026 heart disease and stroke statistics: A report of U.S. and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001412
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e26–e30.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
  • Prabhakaran, S., Gonzalez, N. R., Zachrison, K. S., Adeoye, O., Alexandrov, A. W., Ansari, S. A., Chapman, S., Czap, A. L., Dumitrascu, O. M., Ishida, K., Jadhav, A. P., Johnson, B., Johnston, K. C., Khatri, P., Kimberly, W. T., Lee, V. H., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Mac Grory, B., Madsen, T. E., Menon, B., Mistry, E. A., Park, S., Parker, S., Pérez de la Ossa, N., Reeves, M., Saiz, T., Scott, P. A., Schwartzberg, D., Sheth, S. A., Sporns, P. B., Times, S., Tjoumakaris, S., Wolfe, S. Q., & Yaghi, S.; Peer Review Committee Collaborators. (2026). 2026 guideline for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000513.
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs & U.S. Department of Defense. (2024). VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the management of stroke rehabilitation.
  • Winstein, C. J., Stein, J., Arena, R., Bates, B., Cherney, L. R., Cramer, S. C., Deruyter, F., et al. (2016). Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 47 (6). https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098

STK-2 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
The effectiveness of antithrombotic agents in reducing stroke mortality, stroke-related morbidity and recurrence rates has been studied in several large clinical trials. While the use of these agents for patients with acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks continues to be the subject of study, substantial evidence is available from completed studies. Data at this time suggest that antithrombotic therapy should be prescribed at discharge following acute ischemic stroke to reduce stroke mortality and morbidity as long as no contraindications exist.

For patients with a stroke due to a cardioembolic source (e.g., atrial fibrillation, mechanical heart valve), warfarin is recommended unless contraindicated. In recent years, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been developed and approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for stroke prevention, and may be considered as an alternative to warfarin for select patients. Anticoagulation therapy is not generally recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients presumed to have a non-cardioembolic stroke.

Anticoagulants at doses to prevent venous thromboembolism are insufficient antithrombotic therapy to prevent recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA.

To:
Many clinical trials have studied the effectiveness of antithrombotic agents in reducing stroke mortality, stroke-related morbidity, and recurrence rates; however, a consequence of antithrombotic therapy administration is the potential risk of intracerebral hemorrhage or clinically significant bleeding. For patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), clinical guidelines recommend using antiplatelet agents rather than oral anticoagulation to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and other cardiovascular events unless contraindications exist. (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026). Clinicians should individualize the selection of an antiplatelet agent based on patient risk factor profiles, cost, tolerance, relative known efficacy of the agents, and other clinical characteristics (Powers, W., et al., 2019). A recent recommendation from the American Heart/American Stroke Association outlines strong evidence for dual-administration of aspirin and clopidogrel in minor noncardioembolic ischemic stroke (i.e.,, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) Score less than or equal to 3) when intravenous thrombolysis is not given. Therapy should be initiated early and continued for 21 days before switching to single anti-platelet therapy (SAPT) long-term, (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026).

There are separate guideline recommendations for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention after acute ischemic stroke, including extended deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis for select patients. (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026). Anticoagulants such as enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) at doses to prevent DVT are insufficient antithrombotic therapy to prevent recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA.

Selected References
Remove:
  • Adams, H., R. Adams, G. Del Zoppo, L. B. Goldstein, Association Stroke Council of the American Heart, and Association American Stroke. "Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Ischemic Stroke: 2005 Guidelines Update a Scientific Statement from the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In eng]. Stroke 36, no. 4 (Apr 2005): 916-23.
  • Adams, H. P., Jr., G. del Zoppo, M. J. Alberts, D. L. Bhatt, L. Brass, A. Furlan, R. L. Grubb, et al. "Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults with Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology Affirms the Value of This Guideline as an Educational Tool for Neurologists." [In eng]. Stroke 38, no. 5 (May 2007): 1655-711.
  • Albers, G. W, P Amarenco, J. D. Easton, R. L. Sacco, and P. Teal. "Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke." Chest 119 (2001): 300-20.
  • Albers, G. W., P. Amarenco, J. D. Easton, R. L. Sacco, and P. Teal. "Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: The Seventh Accp Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy." [In eng]. Chest 126, no. 3 Suppl (Sep 2004): 483S-512S.
  • Antithrombotic Trialists, Collaboration. "Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials of Antiplatelet Therapy for Prevention of Death, Myocardial Infarction, and Stroke in High Risk Patients." [In eng]. BMJ 324, no. 7329 (Jan 12 2002): 71-86.
  • Bhatt, D. L., K. A. Fox, W. Hacke, P. B. Berger, H. R. Black, W. E. Boden, P. Cacoub, et al. "Clopidogrel and Aspirin Versus Aspirin Alone for the Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events." [In eng]. N Engl J Med 354, no. 16 (Apr 20 2006): 1706-17.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Prevalence and Most Common Causes of Disability among Adults--United States, 2005." [In eng]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58, no. 16 (May 1 2009): 421-6.
  • Chen, Z. M., P. Sandercock, H. C. Pan, C. Counsell, R. Collins, L. S. Liu, J. X. Xie, C. Warlow, and R. Peto. "Indications for Early Aspirin Use in Acute Ischemic Stroke : A Combined Analysis of 40 000 Randomized Patients from the Chinese Acute Stroke Trial and the International Stroke Trial. On Behalf of the Cast and Ist Collaborative Groups." [In eng]. Stroke 31, no. 6 (Jun 2000): 1240-9.
  • "Collaborative Overview of Randomised Trials of Antiplatelet Therapy--I: Prevention of Death, Myocardial Infarction, and Stroke by Prolonged Antiplatelet Therapy in Various Categories of Patients. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration." [In eng]. BMJ 308, no. 6921 (Jan 8 1994): 81-106.
  • Committee, Caprie Steering. "A Randomised, Blinded, Trial of Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events (Caprie). Caprie Steering Committee." [In eng]. Lancet 348, no. 9038 (Nov 16 1996): 1329-39.
  • "A Comparison of Two Doses of Aspirin (30 Mg Vs. 283 Mg a Day) in Patients after a Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Ischemic Stroke. The Dutch Tia Trial Study Group." [In eng]. N Engl J Med 325, no. 18 (Oct 31 1991): 1261-6.
  • Coull, B. M., L. S. Williams, L. B. Goldstein, J. F. Meschia, D. Heitzman, S. Chaturvedi, K. C. Johnston, et al. "Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet Agents in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Report of the Joint Stroke Guideline Development Committee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Stroke Association (a Division of the American Heart Association)." [In eng]. Stroke 33, no. 7 (Jul 2002): 1934-42.
  • Diener, H. C., J. Bogousslavsky, L. M. Brass, C. Cimminiello, L. Csiba, M. Kaste, D. Leys, et al. "Aspirin and Clopidogrel Compared with Clopidogrel Alone after Recent Ischaemic Stroke or Transient Ischaemic Attack in High-Risk Patients (Match): Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial." [In eng]. Lancet 364, no. 9431 (Jul 24-30 2004): 331-7.
  • Eccles, M., N. Freemantle, and J. Mason. "North of England Evidence Based Guideline Development Project: Guideline on the Use of Aspirin as Secondary Prophylaxis for Vascular Disease in Primary Care. North of England Aspirin Guideline Development Group." [In eng]. BMJ 316, no. 7140 (Apr 25 1998): 1303-9.
  • "The European Stroke Prevention Study (Esps). Principal End-Points. The Esps Group." [In eng]. Lancet 2, no. 8572 (Dec 12 1987): 1351-4.
  • Farrell, B., J. Godwin, S. Richards, and C. Warlow. "The United Kingdom Transient Ischaemic Attack (Uk-Tia) Aspirin Trial: Final Results." [In eng]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 54, no. 12 (Dec 1991): 1044-54.
  • Gaspoz, J. M., P. G. Coxson, P. A. Goldman, L. W. Williams, K. M. Kuntz, M. G. Hunink, and L. Goldman. "Cost Effectiveness of Aspirin, Clopidogrel, or Both for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease." [In eng]. N Engl J Med 346, no. 23 (Jun 6 2002): 1800-6.
  • Gent, M., J. A. Blakely, J. D. Easton, D. J. Ellis, V. C. Hachinski, J. W. Harbison, E. Panak, et al. "The Canadian American Ticlopidine Study (Cats) in Thromboembolic Stroke." [In eng]. Lancet 1, no. 8649 (Jun 3 1989): 1215-20.
  • Gorelick, P. B., D. Richardson, M. Kelly, S. Ruland, E. Hung, Y. Harris, S. Kittner, S. Leurgans, and Investigators African American Antiplatelet Stroke Prevention Study. "Aspirin and Ticlopidine for Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Black Patients: A Randomized Trial." [In eng]. JAMA 289, no. 22 (Jun 11 2003): 2947-57.
  • Group, Esprit Study, P. H. Halkes, J. van Gijn, L. J. Kappelle, P. J. Koudstaal, and A. Algra. "Aspirin Plus Dipyridamole Versus Aspirin Alone after Cerebral Ischaemia of Arterial Origin (Esprit): Randomised Controlled Trial." [In eng]. Lancet 367, no. 9523 (May 20 2006): 1665-73.
  • Guyatt, G. H., E. A. Akl, M. Crowther, D. D. Gutterman, H. J. Schuunemann, Therapy American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic, and Panel Prevention of Thrombosis. "Executive Summary: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th Ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines." [In eng]. Chest 141, no. 2 Suppl (Feb 2012): 7S-47S.
  • Guyatt, G., H. Schunemann, D. Cook, R. Jaeschke, S. Pauker, H. Bucher, and Physicians American College of Chest. "Grades of Recommendation for Antithrombotic Agents." [In eng]. Chest 119, no. 1 Suppl (Jan 2001): 3S-7S.
  • Hass, W. K., J. D. Easton, H. P. Adams, Jr., W. Pryse-Phillips, B. A. Molony, S. Anderson, and B. Kamm. "A Randomized Trial Comparing Ticlopidine Hydrochloride with Aspirin for the Prevention of Stroke in High-Risk Patients. Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study Group." [In eng]. N Engl J Med 321, no. 8 (Aug 24 1989): 501-7.
  • "The International Stroke Trial (Ist): A Randomised Trial of Aspirin, Subcutaneous Heparin, Both, or Neither among 19435 Patients with Acute Ischaemic Stroke. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group." [In eng]. Lancet 349, no. 9065 (May 31 1997): 1569-81.
  • Jauch, E. C., J. L. Saver, H. P. Adams, Jr., A. Bruno, J. J. Connors, B. M. Demaerschalk, P. Khatri, et al. "Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In Eng]. Stroke (Jan 31 2013).
  • Johnson, E. S., S. F. Lanes, C. E. Wentworth, 3rd, M. H. Satterfield, B. L. Abebe, and L. W. Dicker. "A Metaregression Analysis of the Dose-Response Effect of Aspirin on Stroke." [In eng]. Arch Intern Med 159, no. 11 (Jun 14 1999): 1248-53.
  • Kennedy, J., M. D. Hill, K. J. Ryckborst, M. Eliasziw, A. M. Demchuk, A. M. Buchan, and Faster Investigators. "Fast Assessment of Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack to Prevent Early Recurrence (Faster): A Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial." [In eng]. Lancet Neurol 6, no. 11 (Nov 2007): 961-9.
  • Kernan, W.N., B. Ovbiagele, H. R. Black, D. M. Bravata, M. I. Chimowitz, M. D. Ezekowitz, M. C. Fang, M. Fisher, K. L. Furie, D. V. Heck, S. C. Johnston, S. E. Kasner, S. J. Kittner, P. H. Mitchell, M. W. Rich, D. Richardson, L. H. Schwamm, J. A. Wilson. “Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.” [in eng.] Stroke 45, no. 7 (May 2014): 2160-223.
  • Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, Cockroft KM, Gutierrez J, Lombardi-Hill D, Kamel H, Kernan WN, Kittner SJ, Leira EC, Lennon O, Meschia J., Nguyen TN, Pollak PM, Santangeli P, Sharrief AZ, Smith SC Jr., Turan TN, Williams LS. 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke In Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021 July;52(7):e364-e467.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e45-e46.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • "A Randomized Trial of Aspirin and Sulfinpyrazone in Threatened Stroke. The Canadian Cooperative Study Group." [In eng]. N Engl J Med 299, no. 2 (Jul 13 1978): 53-9.
  • Roger, V. L., A. S. Go, D. M. Lloyd-Jones, E. J. Benjamin, J. D. Berry, W. B. Borden, D. M. Bravata, et al. "Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2012 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association." [In eng]. Circulation 125, no. 1 (Jan 3 2012): e2-e220.
  • Sacco, R. L., H. C. Diener, S. Yusuf, D. Cotton, S. Ounpuu, W. A. Lawton, Y. Palesch, et al. "Aspirin and Extended-Release Dipyridamole Versus Clopidogrel for Recurrent Stroke." [In eng]. N Engl J Med 359, no. 12 (Sep 18 2008): 1238-51.
  • "Swedish Aspirin Low-Dose Trial (Salt) of 75 Mg Aspirin as Secondary Prophylaxis after Cerebrovascular Ischaemic Events. The Salt Collaborative Group." [In eng]. Lancet 338, no. 8779 (Nov 30 1991): 1345-9.
  • "United Kingdom Transient Ischaemic Attack (Uk-Tia) Aspirin Trial: Interim Results. Uk-Tia Study Group." [In eng]. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 296, no. 6618 (Jan 30 1988): 316-20.

Add:
  • Kleindorfer, D. O., Towfighi, A, Chaturvedi, S., Cockroft, K. M., Gutierrez, J., Lombardi-Hill, D., Kamel, H., Kernan, W. N., Kittner, S. J., Leira, E. C., Lennon, O., Meschia, J. F., Nguyen, T. N., Pollak, P. M., Santangeli, P., Sharrief, A. Z., Smith, S. C., Jr., Turan, T. N., & Williams, L. S. (2021). Guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 52 (7), e364–e467.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e26–e30.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
  • Prabhakaran, S., Gonzalez, N. R., Zachrison, K. S., Adeoye, O., Alexandrov, A. W., Ansari, S. A., Chapman, S., Czap, A. L., Dumitrascu, O. M., Ishida, K., Jadhav, A. P., Johnson, B., Johnston, K. C., Khatri, P., Kimberly, W. T., Lee, V. H., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Mac Grory, B., Madsen, T. E., Menon, B., Mistry, E. A., Park, S., Parker, S., Pérez de la Ossa, N., Reeves, M., Saiz, T., Scott, P. A., Schwartzberg, D., Sheth, S. A., Sporns, P. B., Times, S., Tjoumakaris, S., Wolfe, S. Q., & Yaghi, S.; Peer Review Committee Collaborators. (2026). 2026 guideline for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000513
STK-3 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia and an important risk factor for stroke. It is one of several conditions and lifestyle factors that have been identified as risk factors for stroke. It has been estimated that 6.6 million individuals in the United States have AF, and the prevalence is expected to increase to 12.1 million by 2030. While the median age of patients with atrial fibrillation is 75 years, the incidence increases with advancing age (14.2 per 1000 PY at 65–69 years of age to 50.8 per 1000 PY at ≥85 years of age).

Furthermore, a prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are among a limited number of predictors of high stroke risk within the population of patients with atrial fibrillation. Nonparoxysmal AF compared to paroxysmal AF has been associated with a higher risk of stroke in this patient population. Therefore, much emphasis has been placed on identifying methods for preventing recurrent ischemic stroke as well as preventing first stroke. Prevention strategies focus on the modifiable risk factors such as hypertension, smoking, and atrial fibrillation.

Anticoagulation therapy is recommended for secondary stroke prevention for ischemic stroke patients with AF, unless contraindicated. Globally, the use of direct oral anticoagulant medications has continued to increase since 2018 and the prevalence of vitamin K antagonist use decreased. However, about 10% of patients are still treated with antiplatelet medications only.

To:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia, affecting an estimated 6.6 million individuals in the United States and is expected to increase to 12.1 million by 2030, (Martin, S., et al., 2025). While the median age of patients with atrial fibrillation is 75 years, the incidence increases with advancing age (14.2 per 1000 PY at 65–69 years of age to 50.8 per 1000 PY at ≥85 years of age).

AF is also an important risk factor for stroke. Furthermore, a prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are among a limited number of predictors of high stroke risk within the population of patients with atrial fibrillation. Nonparoxysmal AF compared to paroxysmal AF has been associated with a higher risk of stroke in this patient population. Therefore, much emphasis has been placed on identifying methods for preventing recurrent ischemic stroke as well as preventing first stroke. Prevention strategies focus on the modifiable risk factors such as hypertension, smoking, and atrial fibrillation.

Analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials (e.g., AFASAK, BAATAF, SPAF, CAFA, SPINAF, EAFT) investigating the efficacy of warfarin in the primary prevention of thromboembolic stroke found that warfarin reduced the relative risk of thromboembolic stroke by about two-thirds (RR ≈ 0.3–0.4) for AF patients. In more recent years, direct oral anticoagulant agents have been developed and approved by the FDA for stroke prevention. The AHA/ASA guidelines now prefer direct oral anticoagulant medications over warfarin for secondary prevention in ischemic stroke patients with AF/flutter, (Kleindorfer, D., et al., 2021). Globally, the use of direct oral anticoagulant medications has continued to increase since 2018, and the prevalence of vitamin K antagonist use decreased. Clinicians still treat about 10 percent of patients with antiplatelet medications only, (Ibid.).

Selected References
Remove:
  • Berge, E., M. Abdelnoor, P. H. Nakstad, and P. M. Sandset. "Low Molecular-Weight Heparin Versus Aspirin in Patients with Acute Ischaemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation: A Double-Blind Randomised Study. Haest Study Group. Heparin in Acute Embolic Stroke Trial." [In eng]. Lancet 355, no. 9211 (Apr 8 2000): 1205-10.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Prevalence and Most Common Causes of Disability among Adults--United States, 2005." [In eng]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58, no. 16 (May 1 2009): 421-6.
  • Connolly, S. J., M. D. Ezekowitz, S. Yusuf, J. Eikelboom, J. Oldgren, A. Parekh, J. Pogue, et al. "Dabigatran Versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation." [In eng]. N Engl J Med 361, no. 12 (Sep 17 2009): 1139-51.
  • Fuster, V., L. E. Ryden, R. W. Asinger, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, R. L. Frye, J. L. Halperin, et al. "Acc/Aha/Esc Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Executive Summary. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation): Developed in Collaboration with the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology." [In eng]. J Am Coll Cardiol 38, no. 4 (Oct 2001): 1231-66.
  • Fuster, V., L. E. Ryden, D. S. Cannom, H. J. Crijns, A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, J. L. Halperin, et al. "Acc/Aha/Esc 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation): Developed in Collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society." [In eng]. Circulation 114, no. 7 (Aug 15 2006): e257-354.
  • Goldstein, L. B., R. Adams, M. J. Alberts, L. J. Appel, L. M. Brass, C. D. Bushnell, A. Culebras, et al. "Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: Cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology Affirms the Value of This Guideline." [In eng]. Stroke 37, no. 6 (Jun 2006): 1583-633.
  • Gorelick, P. B., R. L. Sacco, D. B. Smith, M. Alberts, L. Mustone-Alexander, D. Rader, J. L. Ross, et al. "Prevention of a First Stroke: A Review of Guidelines and a Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement from the National Stroke Association." [In eng]. JAMA 281, no. 12 (Mar 24-31 1999): 1112-20.
  • Hart, R. G., O. Benavente, R. McBride, and L. A. Pearce. "Antithrombotic Therapy to Prevent Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis." [In eng]. Ann Intern Med 131, no. 7 (Oct 5 1999): 492-501.
  • January, C.T., Wann, S., Calkins, H., Chen, L.Y., Cigarroa, J.E., Cleveland, J.C., Ellinor, P.T., et al. "Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society...2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/...A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association." [In eng.]. Circulation 140, no. 2 (Jan 28 2019):e125–e151.
  • Jauch, E. C., J. L. Saver, H. P. Adams, Jr., A. Bruno, J. J. Connors, B. M. Demaerschalk, P. Khatri, et al. "Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In Eng]. Stroke (Jan 31 2013).
  • Kernan, W.N., B. Ovbiagele, H. R. Black, D. M. Bravata, M. I. Chimowitz, M. D. Ezekowitz, M. C. Fang, M. Fisher, K. L. Furie, D. V. Heck, S. C. Johnston, S. E. Kasner, S. J. Kittner, P. H. Mitchell, M. W. Rich, D. Richardson, L. H. Schwamm, J. A. Wilson. “Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.” [in eng.] Stroke 45, no. 7 (May 2014): 2160-223.
  • Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, Cockroft KM, Gutierrez J, Lombardi-Hill D, Kamel H, Kernan WN, Kittner SJ, Leira EC, Lennon O, Meschia J., Nguyen TN, Pollak PM, Santangeli P, Sharrief AZ, Smith SC Jr., Turan TN, Williams LS. 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke In Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021 July;52(7):e364-e467.
  • Kornej, J., Borschel, C. S., Benjamin, E. J., Schnabel, R. B. "Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation in the 21st Century: Novel Methods and New Insights." [In eng]. Circulation Research 127, no. 1 (June 19 2020): 4-20.
  • Lin, H. J., P. A. Wolf, M. Kelly-Hayes, A. S. Beiser, C. S. Kase, E. J. Benjamin, and R. B. D'Agostino. "Stroke Severity in Atrial Fibrillation. The Framingham Study." [In eng]. Stroke 27, no. 10 (Oct 1996): 1760-4.
  • Martin, S.S., Aday, A.W., Allen, N.B., Almarzooq, Z.I., Anderson, C.A.M., Arora, P.,…Palaniappan, L.P. “2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.” [In eng]. Circulation 151, (Feb 25 2025): e333-e334.
  • Penado, S., M. Cano, O. Acha, J. L. Hernandez, and J. A. Riancho. "Atrial Fibrillation as a Risk Factor for Stroke Recurrence." [In eng]. Am J Med 114, no. 3 (Feb 15 2003): 206-10.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e31-e32.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • Saxena, R., and P. J. Koudstaal. "Anticoagulants for Preventing Stroke in Patients with Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation and a History of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (Review). ." Cochrane Database Syst Rev, no. 4 (2011): CD000185.
  • Saxena, R., S. Lewis, E. Berge, P. A. Sandercock, and P. J. Koudstaal. "Risk of Early Death and Recurrent Stroke and Effect of Heparin in 3169 Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation in the International Stroke Trial." [In eng]. Stroke 32, no. 10 (Oct 2001): 2333-7.
  • van Walraven, C., R. G. Hart, D. E. Singer, A. Laupacis, S. Connolly, P. Petersen, P. J. Koudstaal, Y. Chang, and B. Hellemons. "Oral Anticoagulants Vs Aspirin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: An Individual Patient Meta-Analysis." [In eng]. JAMA 288, no. 19 (Nov 20 2002): 2441-8.
  • Wann, L. S., A. B. Curtis, K. A. Ellenbogen, N. A. Estes, 3rd, M. D. Ezekowitz, W. M. Jackman, C. T. January, et al. "2011 Accf/Aha/Hrs Focused Update on the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (Update on Dabigatran): A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines." [In eng]. J Am Coll Cardiol 57, no. 11 (Mar 15 2011): 1330-7.

Add:
  • Campbell, L. A., Ammon, J. P., Kombathula, R., Muhammad, N., & Jackson, C. D. (2025). New atrial fibrillation guideline: Modify risk, control rhythm, prevent progression. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 92 (5), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.92a.24067
  • January, C. T., Wann, S., Calkins, H., Chen, L. Y., Cigarroa, J. E., Cleveland, J. C., Ellinor, P. T., … (2019). 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation, 140 (2), e125–e151.
  • Kleindorfer, D. O., Towfighi, A, Chaturvedi, S., Cockroft, K. M., Gutierrez, J., Lombardi-Hill, D., Kamel, H., Kernan, W. N., Kittner, S. J., Leira, E. C., Lennon, O., Meschia, J. F., Nguyen, T. N., Pollak, P. M., Santangeli, P., Sharrief, A. Z., Smith, S. C., Jr., Turan, T. N., & Williams, L. S. (2021). Guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 52 (7), e364–e467.
  • Kornej, J., Börschel, C. S., Benjamin, E. J., & Schnabel, R. B. (2020). Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in the 21st century: Novel methods and new insights. Circulation Research, 127 (1), 4–20.
  • Martin, S. S., Aday, A. W., Allen, N. B., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., … Palaniappan, L. P. (2025). 2025 heart disease and stroke statistics: A report of US and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 151, e333–e334.
  • Palaniappan, L. P., Allen, N. B., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., Avery, C. L., Baker-Smith, C. M., Bansal, N., Currie, M. E., Earlie, R. S., Fan, W., Fetterman, J. L., Barone Gibbs, B., Heard, D. G., Hiremath, S., Hong, H., Hyacinth, H. I., Ibeh, C., Jiang, T., … Khan, S. S. (2026). 2026 heart disease and stroke statistics: A report of U.S. and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001412
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e26–e30.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
STK-4 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
The administration of IV alteplase to carefully screened, eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke has been shown to be beneficial in several clinical trials (Class I, Level of Evidence A, American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA), 2019). These included two positive randomized controlled trials in the United States: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Studies, Part I and Part II. Based on the results of these studies, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of intravenous alteplase for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke when given within 3 hours of stroke symptom onset. A large meta-analysis controlling for factors associated with stroke outcome confirmed the benefit of IV alteplase in patients treated within 3 hours of symptom onset. Physicians with experience and skill in stroke management and the interpretation of CT scans should supervise treatment.

The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) III trial indicated that intravenous r-tPA (alteplase) can be given safely to, and can improve outcomes for, carefully selected patients treated 3 to 4.5 hours after stroke; however, as the NINDS investigators concluded, the earlier that IV thrombolytic therapy is initiated, the better the patient outcome. Therefore, the target for IV alteplase initiation remains within 3 hours of time last known well. The administration of IV alteplase beyond 3 hours of stroke symptom onset has not been FDA approved.

Although the benefit of IV alteplase has been well established, only a minority of patients with acute ischemic stroke actually receive this medication across the United States, despite the removal of many previous contraindications and warnings for alteplase therapy in recent years. Updated recommendations from the AHA/ASA in 2019 identified IV tenecteplase (TNK) as a reasonable alternative to alteplase. In March, 2025, IV TNK received FDA-approval for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in adults. The approval is based on a large multi-center non-inferiority study demonstrating that the efficacy of TNK and alteplase are comparable. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a potential complication with both agents. However, a systematic review of 26 studies comparing IV TNK with alteplase suggests slightly less risk of an event (RR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.65-1.23) with TNK (Martin, 2025).

To:
The administration of IV thrombolytics to carefully screened, eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke has been shown to be beneficial in several clinical trials (Class I, Level of Evidence A, American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA), 2019). These included two positive randomized controlled trials in the United States: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Studies, Part I and Part II. Based on the results of these studies, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of intravenous alteplase for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke when given within 3 hours of stroke symptom onset. A large meta-analysis controlling for factors associated with stroke outcome confirmed the benefit of IV alteplase in patients treated within 3 hours of symptom onset.

The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) III trial indicated that intravenous r-tPA (alteplase) can be given safely to, and can improve outcomes for, carefully selected patients treated 3 to 4.5 hours after stroke. More recently, guideline recommendations from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association provide additional evidence supporting IV thrombolytic therapy initiation in time frames up to 24 hours for certain select acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients meeting very specific clinical criteria. As the NINDS investigators concluded, guidelines continue to reinforce that patient outcomes are better with faster administration. Physicians with experience and skill in stroke management and the interpretation of CT scans should supervise treatment, (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026).

Although the benefit of IV thrombolytics has been well established, only a minority of patients with acute ischemic stroke actually receive this medication across the United States, despite the removal of many previous contraindications and warnings for therapy. In March 2025, IV tenecteplase (TNK) received FDA-approval for the treatment of AIS in adults. The approval is based on a large multi-center non-inferiority study demonstrating that the efficacy of TNK and alteplase are comparable. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a potential complication with both agents. However, a systematic review of 26 studies comparing IV TNK with alteplase suggests slightly less risk of an event (RR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.65-1.23) with TNK (Martin, 2025). Either IV TNK at a dose of 0.25mg/kg body weight (max dosage 25 mg) or IV alteplase at 0.9mg/kg body weight are recommended for AIS patients eligible for therapy within 4.5 hours of last known well to improve functional outcomes. However, the single bolus-based approach used with TNK may improve the timeliness of administration and shorten door-to-needle (DTN) and door-in-door-out (DIDO) times (Prabhakaran, S. et al., 2026).

Selected References
Remove:
  • Adams, H., R. Adams, G. Del Zoppo, L. B. Goldstein, Association Stroke Council of the American Heart, and Association American Stroke. "Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Ischemic Stroke: 2005 Guidelines Update a Scientific Statement from the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In eng]. Stroke 36, no. 4 (Apr 2005): 916-23.
  • Adams, H. P., Jr., G. del Zoppo, M. J. Alberts, D. L. Bhatt, L. Brass, A. Furlan, R. L. Grubb, et al. "Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults with Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology Affirms the Value of This Guideline as an Educational Tool for Neurologists." [In eng]. Stroke 38, no. 5 (May 2007): 1655-711.
  • Albers, G. W., P. Amarenco, J. D. Easton, R. L. Sacco, and P. Teal. "Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: The Seventh Accp Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy." [In eng]. Chest 126, no. 3 Suppl (Sep 2004): 483S-512S.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Prevalence and Most Common Causes of Disability among Adults--United States, 2005." [In eng]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58, no. 16 (May 1 2009): 421-6.
  • Del Zoppo, G. J., J. L. Saver, E. C. Jauch, H. P. Adams, Jr., and Council American Heart Association Stroke. "Expansion of the Time Window for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke with Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator: A Science Advisory from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In eng]. Stroke 40, no. 8 (Aug 2009): 2945-8.
  • Demaerschalk BM, Kleindorfer DO, Adeoye OM, Demchuk AM, et. al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. “Scientific Rationale for the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.” [In eng]. Stroke, no. 47 (Feb 2016): 581-641.
  • "Diagnosis and Initial Treatment of Ischemic Stroke." Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (2001).
  • Fagan, S. C., L. B. Morgenstern, A. Petitta, R. E. Ward, B. C. Tilley, J. R. Marler, S. R. Levine, et al. "Cost-Effectiveness of Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Ninds Rt-Pa Stroke Study Group." [In eng]. Neurology 50, no. 4 (Apr 1998): 883-90.
  • Guyatt, G. H., E. A. Akl, M. Crowther, D. D. Gutterman, H. J. Schuunemann, Therapy American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic, and Panel Prevention of Thrombosis. "Executive Summary: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th Ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines." [In eng]. Chest 141, no. 2 Suppl (Feb 2012): 7S-47S.
  • Hacke, W., G. Donnan, C. Fieschi, M. Kaste, R. von Kummer, J. P. Broderick, T. Brott, et al. "Association of Outcome with Early Stroke Treatment: Pooled Analysis of Atlantis, Ecass, and Ninds Rt-Pa Stroke Trials." [In eng]. Lancet 363, no. 9411 (Mar 6 2004): 768-74.
  • Hacke, W., M. Kaste, E. Bluhmki, M. Brozman, A. Davalos, D. Guidetti, V. Larrue, et al. "Thrombolysis with Alteplase 3 to 4.5 Hours after Acute Ischemic Stroke." [In eng]. N Engl J Med 359, no. 13 (Sep 25 2008): 1317-29.
  • Hacke, W., M. Kaste, C. Fieschi, D. Toni, E. Lesaffre, R. von Kummer, G. Boysen, et al. "Intravenous Thrombolysis with Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Hemispheric Stroke. The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (Ecass)." [In eng]. JAMA 274, no. 13 (Oct 4 1995): 1017-25.
  • Jauch, E. C., J. L. Saver, H. P. Adams, Jr., A. Bruno, J. J. Connors, B. M. Demaerschalk, P. Khatri, et al. "Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In Eng]. Stroke (Jan 31 2013).
  • Kwiatkowski, T. G., R. B. Libman, M. Frankel, B. C. Tilley, L. B. Morgenstern, M. Lu, J. P. Broderick, et al. "Effects of Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke at One Year. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Stroke Study Group." [In eng]. N Engl J Med 340, no. 23 (Jun 10 1999): 1781-7.
  • "Management of Patients with Stroke: Rehabilitation, Prevention and Management of Complications, and Discharge Planning. A National Clinical Guideline.". http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/118/.
  • Marler, J. R., B. C. Tilley, M. Lu, T. G. Brott, P. C. Lyden, J. C. Grotta, J. P. Broderick, et al. "Early Stroke Treatment Associated with Better Outcome: The Ninds Rt-Pa Stroke Study." [In eng]. Neurology 55, no. 11 (Dec 12 2000): 1649-55.
  • Martin, S.S., Aday, A.W., Allen, N.B., Almarzooq, Z.I., Anderson, C.A.M., Arora, P.,…Palaniappan, L.P. “2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.” [In eng]. Circulation 151, (Feb 25 2025): e353.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e18-e25.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • Sacco, R. L., R. Adams, G. Albers, M. J. Alberts, O. Benavente, K. Furie, L. B. Goldstein, et al. "Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: Co-Sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: The American Academy of Neurology Affirms the Value of This Guideline." [In eng]. Stroke 37, no. 2 (Feb 2006): 577-617.
  • Saposnik, G., J. Fang, M. K. Kapral, J. V. Tu, M. Mamdani, P. Austin, S. C. Johnston, Network Investigators of the Registry of the Canadian Stroke, and Group Stroke Outcomes Research Canada Working. "The Iscore Predicts Effectiveness of Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke." [In eng]. Stroke 43, no. 5 (May 2012): 1315-22.
  • "Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Rt-Pa Stroke Study Group." [In eng]. N Engl J Med 333, no. 24 (Dec 14 1995): 1581-7.
  • Wardlaw, J. M., V. Murray, E. Berge, and G. J. Del Zoppo. "Thrombolysis for Acute Ischaemic Stroke." [In eng]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, no. 4 (2009): CD000213.
  • U.S. Drug and Food Administration. (2015). “Label- Activase-Food and Drug.”

Add:
  • Demaerschalk, B. M., Kleindorfer, D. O., Adeoye, O. M., Demchuk, A. M., Fugate, J. E., Grotta, J. C., Khalessi, A. A., Levy, E. I., Palesch, Y. Y., Prabhakaran, S., Saposnik, G., Saver, J. L., & Smith, E. E. (2016). Scientific rationale for the inclusion and exclusion criteria for intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 47 (2), 581–641. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000086
  • Grotta, J. C., & Haley, E. C., Jr. (2025). Food and Drug Administration approval of tenecteplase: What this means for the field of acute stroke treatment. Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology, 5 (4). https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.125.001824.
  • Martin, S. S., Aday, A. W., Allen, N. B., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., … Palaniappan, L. P. (2025). 2025 heart disease and stroke statistics: A report of US and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 151, e333–e334.
  • Palaniappan, L. P., Allen, N. B., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., Avery, C. L., Baker-Smith, C. M., Bansal, N., Currie, M. E., Earlie, R. S., Fan, W., Fetterman, J. L., Barone Gibbs, B., Heard, D. G., Hiremath, S., Hong, H., Hyacinth, H. I., Ibeh, C., Jiang, T., … Khan, S. S. (2026). 2026 heart disease and stroke statistics: A report of U.S. and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001412.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e26–e30.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
  • Prabhakaran, S., Gonzalez, N. R., Zachrison, K. S., Adeoye, O., Alexandrov, A. W., Ansari, S. A., Chapman, S., Czap, A. L., Dumitrascu, O. M., Ishida, K., Jadhav, A. P., Johnson, B., Johnston, K. C., Khatri, P., Kimberly, W. T., Lee, V. H., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Mac Grory, B., Madsen, T. E., Menon, B., Mistry, E. A., Park, S., Parker, S., Pérez de la Ossa, N., Reeves, M., Saiz, T., Scott, P. A., Schwartzberg, D., Sheth, S. A., Sporns, P. B., Times, S., Tjoumakaris, S., Wolfe, S. Q., & Yaghi, S.; Peer Review Committee Collaborators. (2026). 2026 guideline for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000513
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2015). Label: Activase (alteplase).
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2025). TNKase (tenecteplase) label. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2025/103909s5197lbl.pdf
STK-5 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
The effectiveness of antithrombotic agents in reducing stroke mortality, stroke-related morbidity and recurrence rates has been studied in several large clinical trials. While the use of these agents for patients with acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks continues to be the subject of study, substantial evidence is available from completed studies. Data at this time suggest that antithrombotic therapy should be administered within 2 days of symptom onset in acute ischemic stroke patients to reduce stroke mortality and morbidity as long as no contraindications exist.

To:
Clinical guidelines from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association (AHA /ASA) recommend that patients receive antithrombotic or antiplatelet therapy administered within 24 to 48 hours of stroke onset, (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026). An unintended negative consequence associated with early antithrombotic therapy administration is the potential risk of intracerebral hemorrhage or clinically significant bleeding, such as a gastrointestinal bleed, (Kernan, W., et al., 2014). Current data suggest that this therapy should be administered within two days of symptom onset in acute ischemic stroke patients to reduce stroke mortality and morbidity as long as no contraindications exist, (Powers, W., et al., 2018). For select patients with minor noncardioembolic ischemic stroke (i.e., National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) Score less than or equal to 3) who do not receive intravenous thrombolysis, updated 2026 AHA/ASA clinical guidelines suggest both aspirin and clopidogrel are administered within 24 hours of stroke onset, (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026).

There are separate guideline recommendations for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention after acute ischemic stroke, including extended deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis for select patients. (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026). Anticoagulants such as enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) at doses to prevent DVT are insufficient antithrombotic therapy to prevent recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA.

Selected References
Remove:
  • Adams, H., R. Adams, G. Del Zoppo, L. B. Goldstein, Association Stroke Council of the American Heart, and Association American Stroke. "Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Ischemic Stroke: 2005 Guidelines Update a Scientific Statement from the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In eng]. Stroke 36, no. 4 (Apr 2005): 916-23.
  • Adams, H. P., Jr., G. del Zoppo, M. J. Alberts, D. L. Bhatt, L. Brass, A. Furlan, R. L. Grubb, et al. "Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults with Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology Affirms the Value of This Guideline as an Educational Tool for Neurologists." [In eng]. Stroke 38, no. 5 (May 2007): 1655-711.
  • Albers, G. W, P Amarenco, J. D. Easton, R. L. Sacco, and P. Teal. "Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke." Chest 119 (2001): 300-20.
  • Antithrombotic Trialists, Collaboration. "Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials of Antiplatelet Therapy for Prevention of Death, Myocardial Infarction, and Stroke in High Risk Patients." [In eng]. BMJ 324, no. 7329 (Jan 12 2002): 71-86.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Prevalence and Most Common Causes of Disability among Adults--United States, 2005." [In eng]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58, no. 16 (May 1 2009): 421-6.
  • Chen, Z. M., P. Sandercock, H. C. Pan, C. Counsell, R. Collins, L. S. Liu, J. X. Xie, C. Warlow, and R. Peto. "Indications for Early Aspirin Use in Acute Ischemic Stroke : A Combined Analysis of 40 000 Randomized Patients from the Chinese Acute Stroke Trial and the International Stroke Trial. On Behalf of the Cast and Ist Collaborative Groups." [In eng]. Stroke 31, no. 6 (Jun 2000): 1240-9.
  • Coull, B. M., L. S. Williams, L. B. Goldstein, J. F. Meschia, D. Heitzman, S. Chaturvedi, K. C. Johnston, et al. "Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet Agents in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Report of the Joint Stroke Guideline Development Committee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Stroke Association (a Division of the American Heart Association)." [In eng]. Stroke 33, no. 7 (Jul 2002): 1934-42.
  • Eccles, M., N. Freemantle, and J. Mason. "North of England Evidence Based Guideline Development Project: Guideline on the Use of Aspirin as Secondary Prophylaxis for Vascular Disease in Primary Care. North of England Aspirin Guideline Development Group." [In eng]. BMJ 316, no. 7140 (Apr 25 1998): 1303-9.
  • "The European Stroke Prevention Study (Esps). Principal End-Points. The Esps Group." [In eng]. Lancet 2, no. 8572 (Dec 12 1987): 1351-4.
  • Furie, K. L., S. E. Kasner, R. J. Adams, G. W. Albers, R. L. Bush, S. C. Fagan, J. L. Halperin, et al. "Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In eng]. Stroke 42, no. 1 (Jan 2011): 227-76.
  • Gaspoz, J. M., P. G. Coxson, P. A. Goldman, L. W. Williams, K. M. Kuntz, M. G. Hunink, and L. Goldman. "Cost Effectiveness of Aspirin, Clopidogrel, or Both for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease." [In eng]. N Engl J Med 346, no. 23 (Jun 6 2002): 1800-6.
  • Guyatt, G. H., E. A. Akl, M. Crowther, D. D. Gutterman, H. J. Schuunemann, Therapy American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic, and Panel Prevention of Thrombosis. "Executive Summary: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th Ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines." [In eng]. Chest 141, no. 2 Suppl (Feb 2012): 7S-47S.
  • "The International Stroke Trial (Ist): A Randomised Trial of Aspirin, Subcutaneous Heparin, Both, or Neither among 19435 Patients with Acute Ischaemic Stroke. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group." [In eng]. Lancet 349, no. 9065 (May 31 1997): 1569-81.
  • Jauch, E. C., J. L. Saver, H. P. Adams, Jr., A. Bruno, J. J. Connors, B. M. Demaerschalk, P. Khatri, et al. "Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In Eng]. Stroke (Jan 31 2013).
  • Johnson, E. S., S. F. Lanes, C. E. Wentworth, 3rd, M. H. Satterfield, B. L. Abebe, and L. W. Dicker. "A Metaregression Analysis of the Dose-Response Effect of Aspirin on Stroke." [In eng]. Arch Intern Med 159, no. 11 (Jun 14 1999): 1248-53.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e30.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • Roger, V. L., A. S. Go, D. M. Lloyd-Jones, E. J. Benjamin, J. D. Berry, W. B. Borden, D. M. Bravata, et al. "Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2012 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association." [In eng]. Circulation 125, no. 1 (Jan 3 2012): e2-e220.
  • Sacco, R. L., R. Adams, G. Albers, M. J. Alberts, O. Benavente, K. Furie, L. B. Goldstein, et al. "Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: Co-Sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: The American Academy of Neurology Affirms the Value of This Guideline." [In eng]. Stroke 37, no. 2 (Feb 2006): 577-617.

Add:
  • Kernan, W. N., Ovbiagele, B., Black, H. R., Bravata, D. M., Chimowitz, M. I., Ezekowitz, M. D., Fang, M. C., Fisher, M., Furie, K. L., Heck, D. V., Johnston, S. C., Kasner, S. E., Kittner, S. J., Mitchell, P. H., Rich, M. W., Richardson, D., Schwamm, L. H., Wilson, J. A., American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, & Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. (2014). Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 45 (7), 2160–2236. http://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000024
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e26–e30.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
  • Prabhakaran, S., Gonzalez, N. R., Zachrison, K. S., Adeoye, O., Alexandrov, A. W., Ansari, S. A., Chapman, S., Czap, A. L., Dumitrascu, O. M., Ishida, K., Jadhav, A. P., Johnson, B., Johnston, K. C., Khatri, P., Kimberly, W. T., Lee, V. H., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Mac Grory, B., Madsen, T. E., Menon, B., Mistry, E. A., Park, S., Parker, S., Pérez de la Ossa, N., Reeves, M., Saiz, T., Scott, P. A., Schwartzberg, D., Sheth, S. A., Sporns, P. B., Times, S., Tjoumakaris, S., Wolfe, S. Q., & Yaghi, S.; Peer Review Committee Collaborators. (2026). 2026 guideline for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000513
STK-6 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
There is an extensive and consistent body of evidence supporting the use of statins for secondary prevention in patients with clinically evident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which includes individuals with ischemic stroke due to large artery atherosclerosis, individuals with ischemic stroke due to intrinsic small vessel disease, and individuals with ischemic stroke not directly due to atherosclerosis but with clinically evident atherosclerotic disease in an uninvolved cerebral or noncerebral bed. Both women and men with clinical ASCVD are at increased risk for recurrent ASCVD and ASCVD death. High-intensity statin therapy should be initiated or continued as first-line therapy in women and men less than or equal to 75 years of age who have clinical ASCVD, unless contraindicated. In patients with clinical ASCVD and a contraindication to high-intensity statin therapy, moderate-intensity therapy should be considered as an alternative if it can be tolerated. In individuals greater than 75 years of age, the potential for ASCVD risk reduction benefits, adverse effects, drug-drug interactions, and patient preferences should be considered, and statin therapy individualized based on these considerations (Stone, 2013). Patients with a history of prior stroke or TIA and LDL-C <70 mg/dL have a lower risk of another stroke or cardiovascular event without increased risk for ICH compared to those patients with LDL-C 90-110 mg/dL (Martin, 2025).

To:
There is an extensive and consistent body of evidence supporting the use of statins for secondary prevention in patients with clinically evident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which includes individuals with ischemic stroke due to large artery atherosclerosis, individuals with ischemic stroke due to intrinsic small vessel disease, and individuals with ischemic stroke not directly due to atherosclerosis but with clinically evident atherosclerotic disease in an uninvolved cerebral or noncerebral bed. Both women and men with clinical ASCVD are at increased risk for recurrent ASCVD and ASCVD death.

High-intensity statin therapy should be initiated or continued as first-line therapy in women and men less than or equal to 75 years of age who have clinical ASCVD, unless contraindicated. In patients with clinical ASCVD and a contraindication to high-intensity statin therapy, moderate-intensity therapy should be considered as an alternative if it can be tolerated. In individuals greater than 75 years of age, the potential for ASCVD risk reduction benefits, adverse effects, drug-drug interactions, and patient preferences should be considered, and statin therapy individualized based on these considerations (Stone, N., et al., 2013; Blumenthal, R., et al., 2026).

Previously, a goal of LDL-C <70 mg/dL has been recommended for secondary stroke prevention, (Martin, S., et al., 2025). However, most patients with clinical ASCVD, including those with ischemic stroke, are likely to be at very high risk and have other co-morbidities, such as, a history of hypertension, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or diabetes. A goal of LDL-C <55 mg/dL is now preferred for very high risk patients. In addition to high-intensity statin therapy, ezetimibe and/or a PCSK9 inhibitor may be needed to lower LDL-C and reduce the risk of future ASCVD events, (Blumenthal, R., et al., 2026).

Selected References
Remove:
  • Amarenco, P., J. Bogousslavsky, A. Callahan, 3rd, L. B. Goldstein, M. Hennerici, A. E. Rudolph, H. Sillesen, et al. "High-Dose Atorvastatin after Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack." [In eng]. N Engl J Med 355, no. 6 (Aug 10 2006): 549-59.
  • Biffi, A., W. J. Devan, C. D. Anderson, L. Cortellini, K. L. Furie, J. Rosand, and N. S. Rost. "Statin Treatment and Functional Outcome after Ischemic Stroke: Case-Control and Meta-Analysis." [In eng]. Stroke 42, no. 5 (May 2011): 1314-9.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Prevalence and Most Common Causes of Disability among Adults--United States, 2005." [In eng]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58, no. 16 (May 1 2009): 421-6.
  • Chan, P. S., B. K. Nallamothu, H. S. Gurm, R. A. Hayward, and S. Vijan. "Incremental Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Dose Statin Therapy in High-Risk Patients with Coronary Artery Disease." [In eng]. Circulation 115, no. 18 (May 8 2007): 2398-409.
  • Culver, A. L., I. S. Ockene, R. Balasubramanian, B. C. Olendzki, D. M. Sepavich, J. Wactawski-Wende, J. E. Manson, et al. "Statin Use and Risk of Diabetes Mellitus in Postmenopausal Women in the Women's Health Initiative." [In eng]. Arch Intern Med 172, no. 2 (Jan 23 2012): 144-52.
  • Feher, A., G. Pusch, K. Koltai, A. Tibold, B. Gasztonyi, L. Szapary, and G. Feher. "Statintherapy in the Primary and the Secondary Prevention of Ischaemic Cerebrovascular Diseases." [In eng]. Int J Cardiol 148, no. 2 (Apr 14 2011): 131-8.
  • Grundy, S. M., J. I. Cleeman, C. N. Merz, H. B. Brewer, Jr., L. T. Clark, D. B. Hunninghake, R. C. Pasternak, et al. "Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines." [In eng]. Circulation 110, no. 2 (Jul 13 2004): 227-39.
  • Grundy, S. M., Stone, N. J., Bailey, A. L., Beam, C., Birtcher, K. K., Blumenthal, R. S., et. al. “Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines." [In eng]. Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.003.
  • Kernan, W.N., B. Ovbiagele, H. R. Black, D. M. Bravata, M. I. Chimowitz, M. D. Ezekowitz, M. C. Fang, M. Fisher, K. L. Furie, D. V. Heck, S. C. Johnston, S. E. Kasner, S. J. Kittner, P. H. Mitchell, M. W. Rich, D. Richardson, L. H. Schwamm, J. A. Wilson. “Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.” [in eng.] Stroke 45, no. 7 (May 2014): 2160-223.
  • Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, Cockroft KM, Gutierrez J, Lombardi-Hill D, Kamel H, Kernan WN, Kittner SJ, Leira EC, Lennon O, Meschia J., Nguyen TN, Pollak PM, Santangeli P, Sharrief AZ, Smith SC Jr., Turan TN, Williams LS. 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke In Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021 July;52(7):e364-e467.
  • Kostis, W. J., J. Q. Cheng, J. M. Dobrzynski, J. Cabrera, and J. B. Kostis. "Meta-Analysis of Statin Effects in Women Versus Men." [In eng]. J Am Coll Cardiol 59, no. 6 (Feb 7 2012): 572-82.
  • Lazar, L. D., M. J. Pletcher, P. G. Coxson, K. Bibbins-Domingo, and L. Goldman. "Cost-Effectiveness of Statin Therapy for Primary Prevention in a Low-Cost Statin Era." [In eng]. Circulation 124, no. 2 (Jul 12 2011): 146-53.
  • Martin, S.S., Aday, A.W., Allen, N.B., Almarzooq, Z.I., Anderson, C.A.M., Arora, P.,…Palaniappan, L.P. “2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.” [In eng]. Circulation 151, (Feb 25 2025): e334.
  • Mitka, M. "Some Question Use of Statins to Reduce Cardiovascular Risks in Healthy Women." [In eng]. JAMA 307, no. 9 (Mar 7 2012): 893-4.
  • National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Adults Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults."Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (Ncep) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel Iii) Final Report." [In eng]. Circulation 106, no. 25 (Dec 17 2002): 3143-421.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e44, e47.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • Rodriguez-Yanez, M., J. Agulla, R. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, T. Sobrino, and J. Castillo. "Statins and Stroke." [In eng]. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2, no. 3 (Jun 2008): 157-66.
  • Schellinger, P. D., R. N. Bryan, L. R. Caplan, J. A. Detre, R. R. Edelman, C. Jaigobin, C. S. Kidwell, et al. "Evidence-Based Guideline: The Role of Diffusion and Perfusion MRI for the Diagnosis of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology." [In eng]. Neurology 75, no. 2 (Jul 13 2010): 177-85.
  • Squizzato, A., E. Romualdi, F. Dentali, and W. Ageno. "Statins for Acute Ischemic Stroke." [In eng]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, no. 8 (2011): CD007551.
  • Stone NJ, Robinson J, Lichtenstein AH, Noel Bairey Merz C, Blum CB, Eckel RH, Goldberg AC, Gordon D, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, McBride P, Schwartz JS, Shero Jr, ST, Smith SC, Watson K, Wilson PWF. “Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. [In eng]. Circulation 11, (Nov 2013): 1-84.
  • Van Dis, F. J., L. M. Keilson, C. A. Rundell, and M. W. Rawstron. "Direct Measurement of Serum Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction on Admission to the Emergency Room." [In eng]. Am J Cardiol 77, no. 14 (Jun 1 1996): 1232-4.
  • Weiss, R., M. Harder, and J. Rowe. "The Relationship between Nonfasting and Fasting Lipid Measurements in Patients with or without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Receiving Treatment with 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-Coenzyme a Reductase Inhibitors." [In eng]. Clin Ther 25, no. 5 (May 2003): 1490-7.

Add:
  • Blumenthal, R. S., Morris, P. B., Gaudino, M., Johnson, H. M., Anderson, T. S., Bittner, V. A., Blankstein, R., Brewer, L. C., Cho, L., de Ferranti, S. D., Gianos, E., Gluckman, T. J., Gradney, K. F., Isiadinso, I., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Marrs, J. C., Martin, S. S., McLain, K. H., Mehta, L. S., … Wilkins, J. T. (2026). 2026 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of dyslipidemia: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 153 (17), e1154–e1276. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001423.
  • Culver, A. L., Ockene, I. S., Balasubramanian, R., Olendzki, B. C., Sepavich, D. M., Wactawski-Wende, J., Manson, J. E., … (2012). Statin use and risk of diabetes mellitus in postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172 (2), 144–152.
  • Grundy, S. M., Stone, N. J., Bailey, A. L., Beam, C., Birtcher, K. K., Blumenthal, R. S., … (2018). 2018 guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.003.
  • Kleindorfer, D. O., Towfighi, A, Chaturvedi, S., Cockroft, K. M., Gutierrez, J., Lombardi-Hill, D., Kamel, H., Kernan, W. N., Kittner, S. J., Leira, E. C., Lennon, O., Meschia, J. F., Nguyen, T. N., Pollak, P. M., Santangeli, P., Sharrief, A. Z., Smith, S. C., Jr., Turan, T. N., & Williams, L. S. (2021). Guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 52 (7), e364–e467.
  • Kostis, W. J., Cheng, J. Q., Dobrzynski, J. M., Cabrera, J., & Kostis, J. B. (2012). Meta-analysis of statin effects in women versus men. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 59 (6), 572–582.
  • Martin, S. S., Aday, A. W., Allen, N. B., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., … Palaniappan, L. P. (2025). 2025 heart disease and stroke statistics: A report of US and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 151, e333–e334.
  • Palaniappan, L. P., Allen, N. B., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., Avery, C. L., Baker-Smith, C. M., Bansal, N., Currie, M. E., Earlie, R. S., Fan, W., Fetterman, J. L., Barone Gibbs, B., Heard, D. G., Hiremath, S., Hong, H., Hyacinth, H. I., Ibeh, C., Jiang, T., … Khan, S. S. (2026). 2026 heart disease and stroke statistics: A report of U.S. and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001412.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e26–e30.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
  • Stone, N. J., Robinson, J. G., Lichtenstein, A. H., Bairey Merz, C. N., Blum, C. B., Eckel, R. H., Goldberg, A. C., Gordon, D., Levy, D., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., McBride, P., Schwartz, J. S., Shero, S. T., Smith, S. C., Watson, K., & Wilson, P. W. F. (2013). Guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in adults: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation, 11, 1–84.
STK-8 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
There are many examples of how patient education programs for specific chronic conditions have increased healthful behaviors, improved health status, and/or decreased health care costs of their participants. Clinical practice guidelines include recommendations for patient and family education during hospitalization as well as information about resources for social support services. Some clinical trials have shown measurable benefits in patient and caregiver outcomes with the application of education and support strategies. The type of stroke experienced and the resulting outcomes will play a large role in determining not only the course of treatment but also what education will be required. Patient education should include information about the event (e.g., cause, treatment, and risk factors), the role of various medications or strategies, as well as desirable lifestyle modifications to reduce risk or improve outcomes. Family/caregivers will also need guidance in planning effective and realistic care strategies appropriate to the patient’s prognosis and potential for rehabilitation.

To:
There are many examples of how patient education programs for specific chronic conditions have increased healthful behaviors, improved health status, and/or decreased health care costs of their participants. Clinical practice guidelines include recommendations for patient and family education during hospitalization as well as information about resources for social support services. Some clinical trials have shown measurable benefits in patient and caregiver outcomes with the application of education and support strategies. The type of stroke experienced and the resulting outcomes will play a large role in determining not only the course of treatment but also what education will be required. Patient education should include information about the event (e.g., cause, treatment, and risk factors), the role of various medications or strategies, as well as desirable lifestyle modifications to reduce risk or improve outcomes. Family/caregivers will also need guidance in planning effective and realistic care strategies appropriate to the patient’s prognosis and potential for rehabilitation.

Stroke education starts with information about key warning signs and symptoms, as well as, steps to activate the emergency medical system (EMS) if and when stroke signs and symptoms occur. Early recognition can decrease arrival times to the emergency department, hasten stroke diagnosis, increase treatment times for patients eligible for reperfusion therapies, and ultimately improve outcomes for more patients, (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026). Education can be reinforced during an inpatient admission for an acute stroke event but should begin sooner to improve stroke knowledge and awareness across a population and potentially prevent first-time strokes.

Selected References:
Remove:
  • Anderson, R. T., F. Camacho, A. I. Iaconi, C. H. Tegeler, and R. Balkrishnan. "Enhancing the Effectiveness of Community Stroke Risk Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial." [In eng]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 20, no. 4 (Jul-Aug 2011): 330-5.
  • Boysen, G., L. H. Krarup, X. Zeng, A. Oskedra, J. Korv, G. Andersen, C. Gluud, et al. "Exstroke Pilot Trial of the Effect of Repeated Instructions to Improve Physical Activity after Ischaemic Stroke: A Multinational Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial." [In eng]. BMJ 339 (2009): b2810.
  • Byers, A. M., L. Lamanna, and A. Rosenberg. "The Effect of Motivational Interviewing after Ischemic Stroke on Patient Knowledge and Patient Satisfaction with Care: A Pilot Study." [In eng]. J Neurosci Nurs 42, no. 6 (Dec 2010): 312-22.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Prevalence and Most Common Causes of Disability among Adults--United States, 2005." [In eng]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58, no. 16 (May 1 2009): 421-6.
  • Chan, Y. F., R. Lavery, N. Fox, R. Kwon, S. Zinzuwadia, R. Massone, and D. Livingston. "Effect of an Educational Video on Emergency Department Patient Stroke Knowledge." [In eng]. J Emerg Med 34, no. 2 (Feb 2008): 215-20.
  • Davis, S. M., D. Martinelli, B. Braxton, K. Kutrovac, and T. Crocco. "The Impact of the Extended Parallel Process Model on Stroke Awareness: Pilot Results from a Novel Study." [In eng]. Stroke 40, no. 12 (Dec 2009): 3857-63.
  • Dromerick, A. W., M. C. Gibbons, D. F. Edwards, D. E. Farr, M. L. Giannetti, B. Sanchez, N. M. Shara, et al. "Preventing Recurrence of Thromboembolic Events through Coordinated Treatment in the District of Columbia." [In eng]. Int J Stroke 6, no. 5 (Oct 2011): 454-60.
  • Duncan, P. W., R. Zorowitz, B. Bates, J. Y. Choi, J. J. Glasberg, G. D. Graham, R. C. Katz, K. Lamberty, and D. Reker. "Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: A Clinical Practice Guideline." [In eng]. Stroke 36, no. 9 (Sep 2005): e100-43.
  • Eames, S., T. Hoffmann, L. Worrall, and S. Read. "Delivery Styles and Formats for Different Stroke Information Topics: Patient and Carer Preferences." [In eng]. Patient Educ Couns 84, no. 2 (Aug 2011): e18-23.
  • Eames, S., T. Hoffmann, L. Worrall, and S. Read. "Stroke Patients' and Carers' Perception of Barriers to Accessing Stroke Information." [In eng]. Top Stroke Rehabil 17, no. 2 (Mar-Apr 2010): 69-78.
  • Evans, R. L., A. L. Matlock, D. S. Bishop, S. Stranahan, and C. Pederson. "Family Intervention after Stroke: Does Counseling or Education Help?" [In eng]. Stroke 19, no. 10 (Oct 1988): 1243-9.
  • Furie, K. L., S. E. Kasner, R. J. Adams, G. W. Albers, R. L. Bush, S. C. Fagan, J. L. Halperin, et al. "Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In eng]. Stroke 42, no. 1 (Jan 2011): 227-76.
  • Goldstein, L. B., C. D. Bushnell, R. J. Adams, L. J. Appel, L. T. Braun, S. Chaturvedi, M. A. Creager, et al. "Guidelines for the Primary Prevention of Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In eng]. Stroke 42, no. 2 (Feb 2011): 517-84.
  • Greenberg, S. M., Ziai, W. C., Cordonnier, C., Dowlatshahi, D., Francis, B., Goldstein, J. N., Hemphill, J. C. III, Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Mack, W.J., Mocco, J., Newton, E. J., Ruff, I. M., Sansing, L. H., Schulman, S., Selim, M. H., Sheth, K. N., Sprigg, N., Sunnerhagen, K. S. "2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In Eng]. Stroke 53, no. 7 (Jul 2022): e282-e361.
  • Gresham, G. E., P. W. Duncan, W. B. Stason, H. P. Adams, A. M. Adelman, D. N. Alexander, D. S. Bishop et al. "Post-stroke rehabilitation. Clinical practice guideline, no. 16. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services." Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (1995): 95-0062.
  • Hafsteinsdottir, T. B., M. Vergunst, E. Lindeman, and M. Schuurmans. "Educational Needs of Patients with a Stroke and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review of the Literature." [In eng]. Patient Educ Couns 85, no. 1 (Oct 2011): 14-25.
  • Harrington, R., G. Taylor, S. Hollinghurst, M. Reed, H. Kay, and V. A. Wood. "A Community-Based Exercise and Education Scheme for Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Economic Evaluation." [In eng]. Clin Rehabil 24, no. 1 (Jan 2010): 3-15.
  • "Kaiser Permanente Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Stroke Quartet III Inpatient Management." The Permanente Medical Group, http://www.kaiserpapers.org/cajud/acutestroke/inpaman.html.
  • Jauch, E. C., J. L. Saver, H. P. Adams, Jr., A. Bruno, J. J. Connors, B. M. Demaerschalk, P. Khatri, et al. "Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In Eng]. Stroke (Jan 31 2013).
  • Lindsay, M. P., G. Gubitz, M. Bayley, M. D. Hill, C. Davies-Schinkel, S. Singh, and S. Phillips. "Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care (Update 2010)." In, The Canadian Stroke Strategy (2010): 17-20, 129-50. http://www.strokebestpractices.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/2010BPR_ENG.pdf
  • Lorig, K. R., D. S. Sobel, A. L. Stewart, B. W. Brown, Jr., A. Bandura, P. Ritter, V. M. Gonzalez, D. D. Laurent, and H. R. Holman. "Evidence Suggesting That a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program Can Improve Health Status While Reducing Hospitalization: A Randomized Trial." [In eng]. Med Care 37, no. 1 (Jan 1999): 5-14.
  • Maasland, L., D. Brouwer-Goossensen, H. M. den Hertog, P. J. Koudstaal, and D. W. Dippel. "Health Education in Patients with a Recent Stroke or Transient Ischaemic Attack: A Comprehensive Review." [In eng]. Int J Stroke 6, no. 1 (Feb 2011): 67-74.
  • Ostwald, S. K., S. Davis, G. Hersch, C. Kelley, and K. M. Godwin. "Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines for Stroke Survivors after Discharge Home." [In eng]. J Neurosci Nurs 40, no. 3 (Jun 2008): 173-9, 91.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e48.
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.
  • Roger, V. L., A. S. Go, D. M. Lloyd-Jones, E. J. Benjamin, J. D. Berry, W. B. Borden, D. M. Bravata, et al. "Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2012 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association." [In eng]. Circulation 125, no. 1 (Jan 3 2012): e2-e220.
  • Smith, J., A. Forster, A. House, P. Knapp, J. Wright, and J. Young. "Information Provision for Stroke Patients and Their Caregivers." [In eng]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, no. 2 (2008): CD001919.
  • Yvonne Chan, Y. F., R. Nagurka, L. D. Richardson, S. B. Zaets, M. B. Brimacombe, and S. R. Levine. "Effectiveness of Stroke Education in the Emergency Department Waiting Room." [In eng]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 19, no. 3 (May 2010): 209-15.

Add:
  • Greenberg, S. M., Ziai, W. C., Cordonnier, C., Dowlatshahi, D., Francis, B., Goldstein, J. N., Hemphill, J. C., III, Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Mack, W. J., Mocco, J., Newton, E. J., Ruff, I. M., Sansing, L. H., Schulman, S., Selim, M. H., Sheth, K. N., Sprigg, N., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2022). 2022 guideline for the management of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 53 (7), e325–e326.
  • Hoh, B. L., Ko, N. U., Amin-Hanjani, S., Chou, S. H.-Y., Cruz-Flores, S., Dangayach, N. S., Derdeyn, C. P., Du, R., Hänggi, D., Hetts, S. W., Ifejika, N. L., Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Lucke-Wold, B., Rabinstein, A. A., Robicsek, S. A., Stapleton, C. J., Suarez, J. I., … Welch, B. G. (2023). 2023 guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 54, e321. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.000000000000043.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e26–e30.
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al. (2019). Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50 (12), e344–e418.
  • Prabhakaran, S., Gonzalez, N. R., Zachrison, K. S., Adeoye, O., Alexandrov, A. W., Ansari, S. A., Chapman, S., Czap, A. L., Dumitrascu, O. M., Ishida, K., Jadhav, A. P., Johnson, B., Johnston, K. C., Khatri, P., Kimberly, W. T., Lee, V. H., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Mac Grory, B., Madsen, T. E., Menon, B., Mistry, E. A., Park, S., Parker, S., Pérez de la Ossa, N., Reeves, M., Saiz, T., Scott, P. A., Schwartzberg, D., Sheth, S. A., Sporns, P. B., Times, S., Tjoumakaris, S., Wolfe, S. Q., & Yaghi, S.; Peer Review Committee Collaborators. (2026). 2026 guideline for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000513.

STK-OP-1 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Also, clarification added for site-level data collection. Rationale
Change from:
Hemorrhagic stroke is a life-threatening condition caused by a rupture in a weakened blood vessel in the brain. Surgical intervention to repair a ruptured aneurysm may be indicated and necessitate urgent transfer of the patient, if the hospital is unable to provide advanced neurological treatments and services.

The benefits of both IV altelplase and mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke are time dependent. The earlier the treatment within the time window, the greater the benefit to patients. Initiation of IV alteplase at a primary stroke center (PSC) and rapid transport to an advanced center capable of performing endovascular treatment may lead to faster and more complete reperfusion for certain patients eligible for these treatments (Powers, 2018).

In 2013, The Brain Attack Coalition recommended that stroke transfers occur within 2 hours of patient arrival at the referring stroke center (Alberts, 2013). Since that time, faster door-in-door-out (DIDO) times have been reported for specific groups of stroke patients. For hospitals without an on-site mechanical thrombectomy (MT) service, shorter door-in-door-out (DIDO) times should be the goal. Choi and colleagues recently reported a median DIDO time of 86 minutes (IQR, 65–111) for acute ischemic stroke patients transferred out for potential MT. During working hours (0800–1700 hours), a median DIDO time of 59 minutes (IQR, 51–80) was achieved (Choi, 2019). Prolonged transfer times may result in worse outcomes for MT-eligible patients with evolving large vessel occlusion (ELVO) who are without successful reperfusion. Higher NIHSS scores have been noted at discharge and 90 days (McTaggert, 2018).

Reducing the time stroke patients remain in the emergency department (ED) can improve access to a higher-level of stroke care, surgical intervention, or advanced intra-arterial endovascular treatments, and increase quality of care. For those stroke patients who are not transferred to a TSC or CSC, inpatient admission within 3 hours, preferably to a formal stroke unit, is recommended (Jauch, 2013).

To:
Hemorrhagic stroke is a life-threatening condition caused by a rupture in a weakened blood vessel in the brain. Surgical intervention to repair a ruptured aneurysm may be indicated and necessitate timely transfer of the patient to a stroke center with expertise in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), if the hospital is unable to provide advanced neurological treatments and services. Transfer delays may result in worse outcomes for aSAH patients (Hoh, B.L., et al., 2023).

The benefits of both IV thrombolytics and mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke are time dependent. The earlier the treatment within the time window, the greater the benefit to patients. Initiation of IV alteplase or tenecteplase at an acute stroke ready hospital (ASRH) or primary stroke center (PSC) and rapid transport to an advanced center capable of performing endovascular treatment may lead to faster and more complete reperfusion for certain patients eligible for these treatments (Powers, W.J., et al., 2018).

The American Heart Association® Target Stroke Phase III goals include a door-in-door-out time (DIDO) of < 90 minutes for acute ischemic stroke patients eligible for mechanical thrombectomy (AHA, 2018). Rapid patient transfer is often a first step towards meeting target times for thrombolytic and/or endovascular therapy initiation when the hospital is unable to initiate treatment. For hospitals without an on-site mechanical thrombectomy (MT) service, shorter door-in-door-out (DIDO) times should be the goal. Choi and colleagues reported a median DIDO time of 86 minutes (IQR, 65–111) for acute ischemic stroke patients transferred out for potential MT. During working hours (0800–1700 hours), a median DIDO time of 59 minutes (IQR, 51–80) was achieved (Choi, P.M.C., et al., 2019). However, a recent large U.S. study reported a median DIDO of 174 minutes with only 27.3% of stroke patients transferred under 120 minutes. A significant performance improvement gap of a median 132 minutes was reported for EVT-eligible AIS patients (Stamm, B., et al., 2023). Prolonged transfer times may result in worse outcomes for MT-eligible patients with evolving large vessel occlusion (ELVO) who are without successful reperfusion. Higher NIHSS scores have been noted at discharge and 90 days (McTaggert, R.A., at al., 2018).

Reducing the time stroke patients remain in the emergency department (ED) can improve access to a higher-level of stroke care, surgical intervention, or advanced endovascular treatments, and increase quality of care. EMS pre-notification and the bundling of imaging services (e.g., CT/CTA) can reduce DIDO times (Royan, R., et al., 2026). Agreements with local EMS resources and interhospital transfer protocols for patients requiring higher-level stroke care are a top priority for a stroke system of care and can reduce DIDO times (Prabhakaran, S., et al., 2026).

Selected References
Remove:
  • Alberts MJ, Wechsler LR, Jensen MEL, Lachtaw RE, Crocco TJ, George MG, Baranski J, Bass RR, et al. “Formation and Function of Acute Stroke-Ready Hospitals Within a Stroke System of Care Recommendations From the Brain Attack Coalition” [In Eng]. Stroke (Nov 12 2013).
  • Albright KC, Branas CC, Meyer BC, Matherne-Meyer DE, Zivin JA, Lyden PD, Carr BG. “Acute Cerebrovascular Care in Emergency Stroke Systems.” [In Eng]. Arch Neurol (Oct 2010).
  • American Heart Association. Acute Stroke Ready Hospital, 2015.
  • Choi PMC, Tsoi AH, Pope AL, Leung S, Frost T, Loh PS, Chandra RV, Ma T, Parsons M, Mitchell P, Dewey HM. “Door-in-Door-Out Time of 60 Minutes for Stroke With Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion at a Primary Stroke Center.” [In Eng]. Stroke (Aug 29 2019).
  • Jauch, E. C., J. L. Saver, H. P. Adams, Jr., A. Bruno, J. J. Connors, B. M. Demaerschalk, P. Khatri, et al. "Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association." [In Eng]. Stroke (Jan 31 2013).
  • Lyerly MJ, Albright KC, Boehme AK, Shahripour RB, Donnelly JP, Houston JT, Rawal PV, Kapoor N, Alvi M, Sisson A, Alexandrov AW, Alexandrov AV. “Patient Selection for Drip and Ship Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke”. [In Eng]. South Med J (Jul 2015).
  • McTaggert RA, Moldovan K, Oliver LA, Dibiasio EL, Baird GL, Hemendinger ML, Haas RA, Goyal M, Wang TY, Jayaraman MV. “Door-in-Door-Out Time at Primary Stroke Centers May Predict Outcome for Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion Patients.” [In Eng]. Stroke (Nov 8 2018).
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Jan;49:e8, e10.
  • Sheth KN, Smith EE, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Kleindorfer D, Fonarow GC, Schwamm LH. "Drip and Ship Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Use, Temporal Trends, and Outcomes.” [In Eng]. Stoke (Mar 2015).

Add:
  • American Heart Association. (2018). Phase III Target: Stroke: Higher goals for greater good. https://www.stroke.org/-/media/files/professional/quality-improvement/target-stroke/target-stroke-phase-iii/aha-qi-target-stroke-phase-3-brochure.pdf.
  • Choi, P. M. C., Tsoi, A. H., Pope, A. L., Leung, S., Frost, T., Loh, P. S., Chandra, R. V., Ma, T., Parsons, M., Mitchell, P., & Dewey, H. M. (2019). Door-in-door-out time of 60 minutes for stroke with emergent large vessel occlusion at a primary stroke center. Stroke. Advance online publication.
  • Hoh, B. L., Ko, N. U., Amin-Hanjani, S., Chou, S. H.-Y., Cruz-Flores, S., Dangayach, N. S., Derdeyn, C. P., Du, R., Hänggi, D., Hetts, S. W., Ifejika, N. L., Johnson, R., Keigher, K. M., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Lucke-Wold, B., Rabinstein, A. A., Robicsek, S. A., Stapleton, C. J., Suarez, J. I., … Welch, B. G. (2023). 2023 guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A guideline from[KK3.1] the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 54, e315, e324-25. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.000000000000043
  • Lyerly, M. J., Albright, K. C., Boehme, A. K., Shahripour, R. B., Donnelly, J. P., Houston, J. T., Rawal, P. V., Kapoor, N., Alvi, M., Sisson, A., Alexandrov, A. W., & Alexandrov, A. V. (2015). Patient selection for drip and ship thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Southern Medical Journal, 108 (7), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000306
  • McTaggart, R. A., Moldovan, K., Oliver, L. A., Dibiasio, E. L., Baird, G. L., Hemendinger, M. L., Haas, R. A., Goyal, M., Wang, T. Y., & Jayaraman, M. V. (2018). Door-in-door-out time at primary stroke centers may predict outcome for emergent large vessel occlusion patients. Stroke, 49 (12), 2969–2974. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021936
  • Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., et al., on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e10–e11, e63–e74.
  • Prabhakaran, S., Gonzalez, N. R., Zachrison, K. S., Adeoye, O., Alexandrov, A. W., Ansari, S. A., Chapman, S., Czap, A. L., Dumitrascu, O. M., Ishida, K., Jadhav, A. P., Johnson, B., Johnston, K. C., Khatri, P., Kimberly, W. T., Lee, V. H., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Mac Grory, B., Madsen, T. E., Menon, B., Mistry, E. A., Park, S., Parker, S., Pérez de la Ossa, N., Reeves, M., Saiz, T., Scott, P. A., Schwartzberg, D., Sheth, S. A., Sporns, P. B., Times, S., Tjoumakaris, S., Wolfe, S. Q., & Yaghi, S.; Peer Review Committee Collaborators. (2026). 2026 guideline for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000513
  • Royan, R., Stamm, B., Giurcanu, M., Messe, S. R., Jauch, E. C., Saver, J. L., & Prabhakaran, S. (2026). Door-in-door-out times and outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke transferred for endovascular therapy in the USA: A retrospective cohort study. The Lancet Neurology, 25 (2), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(25)00478-8
  • Sheth, K. N., Smith, E. E., Grau-Sepulveda, M. V., Kleindorfer, D., Fonarow, G. C., & Schwamm, L. H. (2015). Drip and ship thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke: Use, temporal trends, and outcomes. Stroke, 46 (3), 732–739. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007506
  • Stamm, B., Royan, R., Giurcanu, M., Messe, S. R., Jauch, E. C., & Prabhakaran, S. (2023). Door-in-door-out times for interhospital transfer of patients with stroke. JAMA, 330 (7), 636–649. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.12739

Data Collection Approach Notes
Change from:
Some hospitals may prefer to gather data concurrently by identifying patients in the population of interest. This approach provides opportunities for improvement at the point of care/service. However, complete documentation includes the principal or other ICD-10 diagnosis and procedure codes, which require retrospective data entry.

To:
Some hospitals may prefer to gather data concurrently by identifying patients in the population of interest. This approach provides opportunities for improvement at the point of care/service. However, complete documentation includes the principal or other ICD-10 diagnosis and procedure codes, which require retrospective data entry.

NOTE: Records for patients transferred from one hospital site ED/OP to an acute care hospital within the same health system or another outside hospital are to be counted in the measure population.
STK-VOL-1 The measure information form was updated to refresh citations and selected references. Rationale
Change from:
Some Joint Commission-certified Primary Stroke Centers (PSC) perform mechanical thrombectomy (MT) procedures at their facility; however, all PSCs do not perform these procedures but rather transfer the ischemic stroke patient to a higher level stroke center for MT evaluation and intervention. This measure is intended to capture the volume of MTs procedures performed at PSCs that do offer this therapy for acute ischemic stroke. The measure is a simple count of the number of MT procedures performed at the PSC each month.. NOTE: Get With The Guidelines®-Stroke users may run reports to identify the number of patients with ischemic stroke due to a large vessel occlusion who receive mechanical endovascular reperfusion therapy at the facility.

To:
Some Joint Commission-certified Primary Stroke Centers (PSC) perform mechanical thrombectomy (MT) procedures at their facility; however, all PSCs do not perform these procedures but rather transfer the ischemic stroke patient to a higher-level stroke center for MT evaluation and intervention. This measure is intended to capture the volume of MT procedures performed at PSCs that do offer this therapy for acute ischemic stroke.

The measure is a simple count of the number of MT procedures performed at the PSC each month. Get With The Guidelines®-Stroke users may run reports to identify the number of patients with ischemic stroke who receive mechanical endovascular reperfusion therapy at their facility. Median annual EVT volume varies with more MT procedures reported by higher level stroke centers: 76 for CSCs, 55 for TSCs, and 32 for PSCs, (Raychev, R., et al, 2023).

Selected References
Remove:
  • American Heart Association / American Stroke Association, Get With The Guidelines®-Stroke, Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke, September 2020.

Add:
  • Raychev, R., Sun, J.-L., Schwamm, L., Smith, E. E., Fonarow, G. C., Messé, S. R., Xian, Y., Chiswell, K., Blanco, R., Mac Grory, B., & Saver, J. L. (2023). Performance of thrombectomy-capable, comprehensive, and primary stroke centers in reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke: Report from the Get With The Guidelines–Stroke Registry. Circulation, 148 (25). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066114
SUB-3 Rationale updated to reflect updated references Rationale

Change from:

Excessive use of alcohol and drugs has a substantial harmful impact on health and society in the United States. It is a drain on the economy and a source of enormous personal tragedy (The National Quality Forum, A Consensus Report, 2007).

To:

Excessive use of alcohol and drugs has a substantial harmful impact on health and society in the United States.

Change from:

More than 140,000 people in America die each year due to alcohol-related causes, which is the fourth-leading cause of death in the United States (CDC, 2022, NIAAA, 2023).

To:

About 178,000 people die from excessive alcohol drinking each year and excessive alcohol use is a leading preventable cause of death in the United States (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2024).

Change from:

Substance abuse costs the US economy approximately $400 billion dollars each year in lost productivity, crime, and healthcare spending (HHS, 2016). Substance use disorder treatment in US emergency departments and inpatient settings reached more than $13 billion dollars in 2017 (Peterson, 2021).

To:

Excessive alcohol use costs the US economy billions annually in lost productivity, crime, and healthcare spending (CDC, 2024). Substance use disorder treatment in US emergency departments and inpatient settings reached more than $13 billion dollars in 2017 with alcohol related disorders being the most common (Peterson, 2021).

Change from:

According to the 2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), 40.3 million Americans, aged 12 or older, had a substance use disorder (SUD) in the past year (CDC, 2022). As of 2021, 10.6% of the US population age 12 and older (29.5 million people) had an alcohol use disorder in the past year (SAMHSA, 2021).

To:

According to the 2024 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), 48.4 million Americans, aged 12 or older, had a substance use disorder (SUD) in the past year (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA], 2025). As of 2024, 9.7% of the US population age 12 and older (27.9 million people) had an alcohol use disorder in the past year (SAMHSA, 2025).

Change from:

Clinical trials have demonstrated that brief interventions, especially prior to the onset of addiction, significantly improve health and reduce costs, and that similar benefits occur in those with addictive disorders who are referred to treatment (Fleming, 2002, Di Clemente, 2017).

To:

Clinical trials have demonstrated that screening and brief interventions, especially prior to the onset of addiction, results in beneficial reductions in alcohol use and reduces costs, and that similar benefits occur for those who are referred to treatment (Tanner-Smith et al., 2021; Barbosa et al., 2020).

Change from:

In 2019, 3.6 million people were diagnosed with both a serious mental illness and substance use disorder—which is increasing year over year.

To:

In 2024, among the 14.6 million adults who had a severe mental illness, nearly half (6.9 million people) also had a substance use disorder (SAMHSA, 2025).

Change from:

While there are substantial evidence-based interventions for substance use, few patients receive substance use care: of the 21.6 million people in 2019 who needed substance use treatment in 2019, 12.2% (or 2.6 million people) received care in a specialty facility (SAMHSA, 2020).

To:

While there are substantial evidence-based interventions for substance use, few patients receive substance use care: among the 52.6 million people in 2024 who reported needing substance use treatment in the past year, 3.5% (or 10.2 million people) received substance use treatment (SAMHSA, 2025).

Selected references

Change from:

Centers for Disease Control. (2022). Alcohol and Public Health: Alcohol-Related Disease Impact (ARDI). https://www.cdc.gov/ARDI/

To:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Excessive drinking data & statistics. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/excessive-drinking-data/index.html

Remove:

Bernstein J, Bernstein E, Tassiopoulos K, Heren T, Levenson S, Hingson R. Brief motivational interventions at a clinic visit reduces cocaine and heroin use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 Jan 7;77(1):49-59.

Remove:

DiClemente CC, Corno CM, Graydon MM, Wiprovnick AE, Knoblach DJ. Motivational interviewing, enhancement, and brief interventions over the last decade: A review of reviews of efficacy and effectiveness. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Dec;31(8):862-887. doi: 10.1037/adb0000318. PMID: 29199843

Remove:

Fleming MF, Mundt MP, French MT, Manwell LB, Stauffacher EA, Barry KL. Brief physician advice for problem drinkers: Long-term efficacy and cost-benefit analysis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002 Jan;26(1):36-43.

Remove:

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). (2023). Alcohol-Related Emergencies and Deahts in the United States. https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohols-effects-health/alcohol-topics/alcohol-facts-and-statistics/alcohol-related-emergencies-and-deaths-united-states

Remove:

Havassy BE, Alvidrez J, Owen KK. Comparisons of patients with comorbid psychiatric and substance use disorders: implications for treatment and service delivery. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;161(1):139-45.

Remove:

Kirchner JE, Owen RR, Nordquist C, Fischer EP. Diagnosis and management of substance use disorders among inpatients with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Jan;49(1):82-5.

Change from:

Peterson C, Li M, Xu L, Mikosz CA, Luo F. Assessment of Annual Cost of Substance Use Disorder in US Hospitals. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e210242. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0242

To:

Peterson, C., Li, M., Xu, L., Mikosz, C. A., & Luo, F. (2021). Assessment of annual cost of substance use disorder in US hospitals. JAMA Network Open, 4 (3), e210242. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0242

Remove:

Prochaska JJ, Gill PH, Stephen E, Hall SM. Identification and Treatment of Substance Misuse on an Inpatient Psychiatry Unit. Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Mar;56(3):347-9.

Change from:

SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. 2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Table 5.6A—Alcohol use disorder in past year: among people aged 12 or older; by age group and demographic characteristics, numbers in thousands, 2021.

To:

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2025). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2024 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. PEP25-07-007, NSDUH Series H-60). Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/data-we-collect/nsduh-national-survey-drug-use-and-health/national-releases

Remove:

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2020). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. PEP20-07-01-001, NSDUH Series H-55). Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/

Remove:

Substance Use Disorders. 2022. Centers for Disease Control. https://www.cdc.gov/dotw/substance-use-disorders/index.html

Remove:

The National Quality Forum, National Voluntary Consensus Standards for the Treatment of Substance Use Conditions: Evidence-Based Treatment Practices; A Consensus Report; 2007.

Remove:

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of the Surgeon General, Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon General’s Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health. Washington, DC: HHS, November 2016.

Add:

Barbosa, C., McKnight-Eily, L. R., Grosse, S. D., & Bray, J. (2020). Alcohol screening and brief intervention in emergency departments: Review of the impact on healthcare costs and utilization. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 117, 108096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108096

Add:

Tanner-Smith, E. E., Parr, N. J., Schweer-Collins, M., & Saitz, R. (2021). Effects of brief substance use interventions delivered in general medical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 117 (4), 877–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15674
THKR-IP-1 Rationale updated to reflect updated clinical practice guidelines and references Rationale

Change from:

Regional anesthesia is associated with fewer postoperative complications and deaths than general anesthesia. Research shows that patients who received neuraxial anesthesia had statistically significant decreases in 30-day mortality and in-hospital complications including pneumonia, kidney failure and the need for mechanical ventilation.1 Additional studies show decrease in operative blood loss and need for blood transfusions.2-3 Additionally, evidence supports the overall beneficial effects of neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia in decreasing the development of surgical site infections after total hip and knee arthroplasty.4 Several factors, such as compromised cardiopulmonary function, anticoagulative therapy, or anatomical deformity, may prevent general anesthesia and neuraxial blockade from being conducted in total joint replacement surgery.5 Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) can be used as the primary anesthetic for total knee replacement facilitating faster postoperative recovery than general anesthesia.6

In December, 2015, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) published Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Per the guidelines, evidence supports that neuraxial anesthesia could be used to improve select perioperative outcomes and complication rates compared to general anesthesia.7 In March, 2017, AAOS published Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. These guidelines state evidence supports the use of neuraxial anesthesia compared to general anesthesia to reduce complications in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.8 According to the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, from 2005-2011, 52% of knee replacements and 60% of hip replacements were performed under general anesthesia.

Some surgeons avoid using regional anesthesia due to concerns that regional anesthesia may cause motor weakness, making patients more likely to fall when they are walking postoperatively. Peripheral nerve blockade did not alter the risk of inpatient fall, whereas use of neuraxial anesthesia reduced the risk by 30% compared with general anesthesia. The type of anesthesia may represent a modifiable risk factor and the use of neuraxial over general anesthesia may be considered in the context of a fall-prevention program.9

To:

Regional anesthesia for primary elective total hip arthroplasty is associated with lower rates of postoperative complications compared with general anesthesia. Specifically, regional anesthesia has been linked to decreased odds of adverse events, including prolonged ventilator dependence, unplanned intubation, and select postoperative complications such as urinary tract infection and pneumonia (Basques et al., 2015). Additional studies have also demonstrated lower rates of blood transfusion with regional compared to general anesthesia (Basques et al., 2015; Bourget-Murray et al., 2022; Illescas et al., 2025).

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline (2023) suggests that regional anesthesia may be used to reduce adverse events in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Further, the 2020 Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery concluded that both regional anesthesia and modern general anesthesia may be used as part of a multimodal anesthetic regimen (Wainwright et al., 2020).

According to The American Joint Replacement Registry 2024 Annual Report, the use of general anesthesia alone for primary total hip arthroplasty has steadily decreased from 48.8% in 2017 to 36.4% in 2024 (AJRR, 2024). Similarly, the use of general anesthesia alone for total knee arthroplasty decreased from 40.6% in 2017 to 22.7% in 2023 (AJRR, 2024). This decline aligns with growing evidence supporting the benefits of regional anesthesia, such as spinal anesthesia and PNB combinations, which are associated with better postoperative outcomes, including reduced opioid use, quicker recovery times, and fewer complications (AJRR, 2024).

Selected References

Change from:

  • 1 Memtsoudis SG, Xuming S.; Ya-Lin Chiu, et al. Perioperative Comparative Effectiveness of Anesthetic Technique in Orthopedic Patients, Anesthesiology 05 2013, Vol.118, 1046-1058.
  • 2 Mauermann WJ, Shilling AM, Zuo Z. A comparison of neuraxial block versus general anesthesia for elective total hip replacement: a metaanalysis. Anesth. Analg. 2006; 103: 1018–25.
  • 3 Hu S, Zhang Z-Y, Hua Y-Q, Li J, Cai Z-D. A comparison of regional and general anaesthesia for total replacement of the hip or knee: a metaanalysis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2009; 91: 935–42.
  • 4 Zorrilla-Vaca A, Grant MC, Mathur V, Li J, Wu CL. The Impact of Neuraxial Versus General Anesthesia on the Incidence of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections Following Knee or Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine: September/October 2016 - Volume 41 - Issue 5 - p 555–563.
  • 5 Kim JH, Cho MR, et al. A comparison of femoral/sciatic nerve block with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block and combined spinal epidural anesthesia for total knee replacement arthroplasty. Korean J Anesthesiol 2012 May 62(5): 448-453.
  • 6 Liu JL, Yuan WX, et al. Peripheral nerve blocks versus general anesthesia for total knee replacement in elderly patients on the postoperative quality of recovery. Clinical Interventions in Aging 2014:9 341-350.
  • 7 Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. Adopted by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Board of Directors, 12/4/2015.
  • 8 Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. Adopted by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Board of Directors, 3.13.17.
  • 9 Memtsoudis SG, Thomas Danninger, Rehana Rasul, Jashvant Poeran, Philipp Gerner, Ottokar Stundner, Edward R. Mariano, Madhu Mazumdar. Inpatient Falls after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Anesthesiology, 2014; 120 (3): 551-563.
  • Nielsen PT, Jørgensen LN, Albrecht-Beste E, LeffersA, RasmussenLS. Lower thrombosis risk with epidural blockade in knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1990,61:1, 29-31
  • Mitchell D, Friedman, RJ, Baker DJ, Cooke JE, Darcy, MD, Miller MC. Prevention of thromboembolic disease following total knee arthroplasty: Epidural versus general anesthesia. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 1991; 269:109-112.
  • Jorgensen LN, Rasmussen LS, Nielsen PT, Leffers A, Albrecht-Beste E. Antithrombotic efficacy of continuous extradural analgesia after knee replacement. Br J Anaesth. 1991/1; 1: 8-12
  • Soohoo NF, Lieberman JR, et al. Development of Quality of Care Indicators for Patients Undergoing THR/TKR. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:153-157
  • Basques BA, Toy JO, Bohl, DD, Golinvaux, NS, Grauer, JN. General Compared with Spinal Anesthesia for Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2015;97:455-61
  • Hunt LP, Ben-Shlomo Y, Clark EM, Dieppe P, Judge A, MacGregor AJ, Tobias JH, Vernon K, Blom AW. 90 day mortality after 409,096 total hip replacements for osteoarthritis, from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales: a retrospective analysis, Lancet. 2013 Sep 28;382(9898):1097-104
  • Premier-IHI Integrated Care Pathway for Total Joint Arthroplasty (April 2013)
  • Williams-Russo P, Sharrock NE, Haas SB, et al. Randomized Trial of Epidural Versus General Anesthesia: Outcomes After Primary Total Knee Replacement. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 331:199-208, October, 1996.
  • National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database
  • FORCE-Total Joint Registry database
  • Warren, F., Sundaram, A., Anis, A., Kamath, S., Mont, S., Higuera, S., & Piuzzi, S. (2020). Spinal Anesthesia Is Associated With Decreased Complications After Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 28(5), e213–e221.

To:

THKR-IP-2 Rationale updated to reflect updated clinical practice guidelines and references Rationale:

Change from:

Early ambulation as close to the time of surgery as possible can reduce the risk of complications associated with bed rest such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, atelectasis, pneumonia and urinary retention. Additionally, early ambulation results in a decreased length of stay, lowering the patient’s risk for hospital acquired infections and other complications. Early ambulation leads to improvement in outcomes (range of motion, gait, balance, muscle strength and pain) without an increase in adverse events.1 Studies demonstrating positive results showed that rapid ambulation can be achieved as early as in the PACU.2

To:

Early postoperative mobilization is a core component of high-quality care for total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery. The 2020 Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society consensus statement on perioperative care for total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery recommends that patients be mobilized as early as they are able to support functional recovery and facilitate early achievement of discharge criteria. Early mobilization is also recommended to mitigate adverse physiologic effects of postoperative immobility and bed rest, including insulin resistance, muscle atrophy, venous thromboembolism, and postoperative pulmonary complications (Wainwright et al., 2020; Alsuwaylihi et al., 2026).

Evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of early mobilization following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Mobilization within the first 24 hours after surgery is associated with a reduction in hospital length of stay without an increase in the rate of in hospital postoperative adverse events (Guerra et al., 2015). Additionally, evidence from a large multicenter study demonstrates that early mobilization is independently associated with a significant reduction in postoperative complications occurring within 30 days following total hip and knee arthroplasty (Ripollés-Melchor et al., 2020).

Based on recommendations from a Technical Advisory Panel and public comment, this measure was refined to focus on early postoperative ambulation as a more clinically meaningful indicator of mobilization.

Selected References:

Change from:

  • 1Guerra ML, Singh PJ, Taylor NF. Early mobilization of patients who have had a hip or knee joint replacement reduces length of stay in hospital: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2014 Dec 1.
  • 2Tayrose G, Newman D, Slover J, Jaffe F, Hunter T, Bosco J. Rapid Mobilization Decreases Length of Stay in Joint Replacement Patients. Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases 2013;71(3):222-6.
  • AAOS Guidelines on Preventing Venous Thromboembolic Disease in Patients Undergoing Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty”, AAOS.
  • Premier-IHI Integrated Care Pathway for Total Joint Arthroplasty (April 2013)
  • Soohoo NF, Lieberman JR, et al. Development of Quality of Care Indicators for Patients Undergoing THR/TKR. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:153-157
  • Larsen K, Sorensen, O, Hansen T, Thomsen P, Soballe K. Accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention for hip and knee replacement is effective: A randomized clinical trial involving 87 patients with 3 months of followup. Acta Orthopaedica 79:2, 149-159.
  • den Hertog A, Gliesche K, Timm J, Mühlbauer B, Zebrowski. Pathway-controlled fast-track rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective clinical study evaluating the recovery pattern, drug consumption, and length of stay. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Aug; 132(8):1153-63.
  • Smith TO, McCabe C, Lister Set al Rehabilitation implications during the development of the Norwich Enhanced Recovery Programme (NERP) for patients following total knee and total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98: 499–505.
  • Raut S, Mertes SC, Muniz-Terrera G, Khanduja V. Factors associated with prolonged length of stay following a total knee replacement in patients aged over 75. Int Orthop 2012; 36: 1,601–1,608.
  • Raphael M, Jaeger M, van Vlymen J. Easily adoptable total joint arthroplasty program allows discharge home in two days. Can J Anaesth 2011; 58: 902–910
  • Pua YH, Ong PH. Association of early ambulation with length of stay and costs in total knee arthroplasty: retrospective cohort study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 93:962-970.
  • Chen AF, Stewart MK, Heyl AE, Klatt BA. Effect of Immediate Postoperative Physical Therapy on Length of Stay for Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2012;Vol.27 No. 6
  • Wellman SS, Murphy AC, Gulcynski D, Murphy SB. Implementation of an accelerated mobilization protocol following primary total hip arthroplasty: impact on length of stay and disposition. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Volume 4(3); 2011 Sep
  • Renkawitz T, Rieder T, Handel M. Comparison of two accelerated clinical pathways – after total knee replacement how fast can we really go? Clinical Rehabilitation 2010; 24:230-239
  • Labraca,NS, Castro-Sanchez,AM, Mataran-Penarrocha,G, Arroyo-Morales,M, Sanchez-Joya,M, Moreno-Lorenzo C. Benefits of starting rehabilitation within 24 hours of primary total knee arthroplasty: randomized clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2011/25(6):557-566
  • Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. Adopted by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Board of Directors, 12/4/2015.

To:

  • Alsuwaylihi, A., O'Connor, D., Joshi, G. P., Kehlet, H., and Lobo, D. N. (2026). Importance of early postoperative mobilization: Comprehensive review. BJS Open, 10 (2), zrag016. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrag016
  • Guerra, M. L., Singh, P. J., and Taylor, N. F. (2015). Early mobilization of patients who have had a hip or knee joint replacement reduces length of stay in hospital: A systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation, 29 (9), 844–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514558641
  • Ripollés-Melchor, J., Abad-Motos, A., Díez-Remesal, Y., Aseguinolaza-Pagola, M., Padin-Barreiro, L., Sánchez-Martín, R., Logroño-Egea, M., García-Orallo, S., Ramirez-Rodriguez, J. M., and POWER2 Study Investigators Group. (2020). Association Between Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Postoperative Complications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the Postoperative Outcomes Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Elective Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Study (POWER2). JAMA Surgery, 155 (4), e196024. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6024
  • Wainwright, T. W., Gill, M., McDonald, D. A., Middleton, R. G., Reed, M., Sahota, O., Yates, P., & Ljungqvist, O. (2020). Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Acta Orthopaedica, 91 (1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1683790

THKR-IP-3 Rationale updated to reflect updated clinical practice guidelines and references Rationale

Change from:

Home-based rehabilitation is increasingly utilized to reduce health-care costs; however, with a shorter hospital stay, the possibility arises for an increase in adverse clinical outcomes. Research has shown that despite concerns about early hospital discharge, there is no difference in pain, functional outcomes, or patient satisfaction between groups that received home-based rehabilitation versus inpatient rehabilitation. Home-based rehabilitation protocol following elective primary total hip or knee replacement is the more cost-effective strategy.1-2

According to 2012 Medicare claims data, 49% of patients undergoing hip and knee replacements were discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) or skilled nursing facility (SNF) for rehabilitation. Therefore, only 51% of patients were discharged to home.

To:

High-quality care for total hip and total knee replacement procedures is designed to promote early functional recovery and enable safe discharge to the patient’s home. The 2020 Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society consensus statement on perioperative care for total hip and knee replacement recommends the use of objective discharge criteria to facilitate direct discharge to home (Wainwright et al., 2020).

Home-based rehabilitation is increasingly used following total hip and knee replacement procedures. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) 2022 Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Evidence Based Clinical Practice Guideline reports that discharge to home, with or without home services, is associated with fewer adverse events compared to discharge to an acute rehabilitation facility or skilled nursing facility (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2022). Additionally, the 2023 Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip Evidence Based Clinical Practice Guideline reports high-quality evidence supporting either formal physical therapy or unsupervised home exercise following total hip arthroplasty (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2023). Analyses of large national datasets indicate that rates of discharge to home following total hip and knee arthroplasty have notably increased over the past decade (American Joint Replacement Registry, 2025; DeMik et al., 2021), although meaningful variation in discharge practices persist (DeMik et al., 2021).

Selected References

Change from:

  • 1Mahomed NN, Davis AM, Hawker G, Badley E, Davey JR, Syed KA. et al. Inpatient compared with home-based rehabilitation following primary unilateral total hip or knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(8):1673–1680.
  • 2Padgett DE, et al. Study: Patients Who Go Home After Knee Replacement Do As Well as Those Discharged to Rehab Facility. Presented at: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting; March 24-28, 2015; Las Vegas.
  • Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Services: Assessing payment adequacy and updating payments - Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy March 2014
  • Mallinson TR, Bateman J, Tseng HY, Manheim L, et al. A Comparison of Discharge Functional Status After Rehabilitation in Skilled Nursing, Home Health, and Medical Rehabilitation Settings for Patients After Lower-Extremity Joint Replacement Surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil Vol 92, May 2011.
  • Fleischman A, Austin, M, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J, Hozack WJ, The Rothman Institute Study: Even if you live alone, there is no place like home after total joint arthroplasty. Presented at American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting; March 14, 2017; San Diego, CA.
  • McLawhorn AS, Fu, MC, Schairer WW, Sculco PK, MacLeanCH,Padgett DE. Continued Inpatient Care After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Increases 30-Day Post-Discharge Complications: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis. The Journal of Arthroplasty. January 31, 2017 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.039).
  • Ramos NL, Karia RJ, Hutzler LH, Brandt AM, Slover JD, Bosco JA. The effect of discharge disposition on 30-day readmission rates after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Apr;29(4):674-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

To:

THKR-IP-4 Description and Rationale updated to reflect updated clinical practice guidelines and references Description

Change from:

Patients who completed the general health and joint specific functional status assessments within 90 days prior to surgery as specified below:

Hips: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] AND [HOOS Jr. (6 questions) or HOOS Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (27 questions)]

Knees: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] AND [KOOS Jr. (7 questions) or KOOS Stiffness, Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (28 questions)]

The assessment tool must reflect the status of the patient’s health condition, health behavior, or experience with health care from the patient’s perspective, without interpretation of the patient’s response by a clinician or anyone else 1. The assessment can be completed by phone, mail, email, or in-person.

To:

Patients who completed the general health and joint specific functional status assessments within 90 days prior to surgery as specified below:

Hips: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] AND [HOOS Jr. (6 questions) or HOOS Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (27 questions)]

Knees: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] AND [KOOS Jr. (7 questions) or KOOS Stiffness, Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (28 questions)]

The assessment tool must reflect the status of the patient’s health condition, health behavior, or experience with health care from the patient’s perspective, without interpretation of the patient’s response by a clinician or anyone else. The assessment can be completed by phone, mail, email, or in-person.

Rationale

Change from:

Good orthopedic care requires knowledge of the patient’s history of musculoskeletal pain and associated limitations in daily function. Standardized measures of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can provide this information. Integrating PROs into routine orthopedic patient visits can provide key information to monitor changes in symptom severity over time, support shared clinical care decisions, and assess treatment effectiveness.2

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) capture patients’ self-assessments of their health and provide a mechanism for evaluating the effectiveness of patient-centered care.3 In acknowledgement of the administrative burden associated with PRO data capture, The Joint Commission will implement PROMs in a phased approach. During this first phase, the process of collecting preoperative data will be measured. During the second phase, pre- and postoperative data will be evaluated with the goal of calculating patients’ improvement scores. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons are very supportive of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ effort to develop patient-reported functional status outcome measures for total hip and knee arthroplasty. When fully specified and risk-adjusted, these measures will be useful in assessing quality and value of care and will permit performance measurement progression beyond process measures.4-5

On August 31, 2015, the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) convened a Patient Reported Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty in Baltimore, Maryland. Representatives from orthopaedic organizations (AAHKS, AAOS, The Hip Society, The Knee Society, and American Joint Replacement Registry), CMS, YNHHSC/CORE, National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), Mathematica, CECity, and Blue Cross Blue Shield Association participated in the Summit. The Summit’s goal was to obtain a consensus regarding the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and risk variables suitable for total hip and knee arthroplasty performance measures.6 The instruments specified in this measure, align with the Summit’s recommendations as well as CMS Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) legislation.

The Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) is a generic patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument used to measure health related quality of life. This tool, which measures physical function and health status, is widely used and is well validated in the total hip and total knee population. Additionally, the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 instrument, funded by the National Institute of Health, is increasingly used in the United States. PROMIS instruments use modern measurement theory to assess patient–reported health status for physical, mental, and social well–being to reliably and validly measure patient reported outcomes (PROs) for clinical research and practice. PROMIS instruments measure concepts such as pain, fatigue, physical function, depression, anxiety and social function. Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) are well validated and widely used instruments for measuring joint-specific pain and physical function before and after joint replacement. While the full HOOS and KOOS surveys are lengthy, the orthopedic community prefers an abbreviated survey that captures a subset of items referred to as HOOS JR/KOOS JR.

To:

Elective total hip and knee replacement procedures seek to relieve pain and improve function, underscoring the importance of evaluating these outcomes pre and post surgery (Ayers, 2017). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized instruments that capture a patient’s perspective on their health status including symptoms, physical function, and quality of life.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has finalized policies to expand the collection and reporting of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for total hip and total knee arthroplasty across multiple programs (CMS, 2025, 2026a, 2026b, 2026c). This expansion reflects a national strategy to capture meaningful pre and postoperative PROMs to support clinical care, shared decision-making, and hospital-level quality assessment for elective total hip and knee replacement procedures (Ayers, 2017; CMS, 2021; Pasqualini et al., 2026).

Informed by the recommendations of the 2015 Patient Reported Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty (American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, 2015), this measure aims to advance preoperative PROM collection for total hip and knee arthroplasty procedures while accounting for the administrative burden associated with PRO data capture.

Selected References

Change from:

  • 1 Cella D, Hahn EA, Jensen SE, Patient-Reported Outcomes in Performance Measurement, ©2015 Research Triangle Institute.
  • 2 Ayers DC, Zheng H, Franklin PD. Integrating Patient-reported Outcomes Into Orthopaedic Clinical Practice: Proof of Concept From FORCE-TJR. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2013;471(11):3419-3425. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3143-z.
  • 3 Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Elective Primary Total Hip and/or Total Knee Arthroplasty: Hospital-Level Performance Measure(s), Phase 3 Measure Methodology Report, Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation – Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), May 2015.
  • 4 AAOS letter to Andy Slavitt, Acting Administrator/CMS dated April 3, 2015. Re.: Response during public comment on “Proposed Electronic Clinical Quality Measures for Functional Status Assessment and Improvement for Patients who received a Total Hip Replacement and Functional Status Assessment and Improvement for Patients who received a Total Knee Replacement.”
  • 5 AAHKS letter to Andy Slavitt, Acting Administrator/CMS dated March 30, 2015. Re.: Response during public comment on “Proposed Electronic Clinical Quality Measures for Functional Status Assessment and Improvement for Patients who received a Total Hip Replacement and Functional Status Assessment and Improvement for Patients who received a Total Knee Replacement.”

  • 6 Patient Reported Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty Report, August 31, 2015.
  • AAHKS sponsored Patient Reported Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty Report. August 31, 2015.
  • FORCE-TJR letter to CMS dated September 3, 2015. Response during public comment on CMS-5516-Proposal for Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Payment Model for Acute Care Hospitals Furnishing Lower Extremity Joint Replacement Services.
  • AAHKS, AAOS, AJRR letter to Andy Slavitt, Acting Administrator/CMS dated September 8, 2015. Response during public comment on CMS-5516-Proposal for Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Payment Model for Acute Care Hospitals Furnishing Lower Extremity Joint Replacement Services.
  • AAHKS letter to Andy Slavitt, Acting Administrator/CMS dated September 8, 2015. Response during public comment on CMS-5516-Proposal for Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Payment Model for Acute Care Hospitals Furnishing Lower Extremity Joint Replacement Services.

To:

THKR-IP-5 Description and Rationale updated to reflect updated clinical practice guidelines and references. Description

Change from:

Patients who completed the general health and joint specific functional status assessments at 1 year (300-425 days) after surgery, as specified below:

Hips: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] AND [HOOS Jr. (6 questions) or HOOS Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (27 questions)]

Knees: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] and {KOOS Jr. (7 questions) or KOOS Stiffness, Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (28 questions)]

The assessment tool must reflect the status of the patient’s health condition, health behavior, or experience with health care from the patient’s perspective, without interpretation of the patient’s response by a clinician or anyone else (Cella et al. 2015). The assessment can be completed by phone, mail, email, or in-person.

To:

Patients who completed the general health and joint specific functional status assessments at 1 year (300-425 days) after surgery, as specified below:

Hips: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] AND [HOOS Jr. (6 questions) or HOOS Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (27 questions)]

Knees: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] and [KOOS Jr. (7 questions) or KOOS Stiffness, Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (28 questions)]

The assessment tool must reflect the status of the patient’s health condition, health behavior, or experience with health care from the patient’s perspective, without interpretation of the patient’s response by a clinician or anyone else. The assessment can be completed by phone, mail, email, or in-person.

Rationale

Change from:

Good orthopedic care requires knowledge of the patient’s history of musculoskeletal pain and associated limitations in daily function, along with improvements or declines seen after surgery. Standardized measures of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can provide this information.

The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) convened a Patient Reported Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty in 2015 with the goal of obtaining consensus regarding the patient-reported outcomes and risk variables suitable for total hip and total knee arthroplasty performance measures (Patient Reported Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty Report, 2015). The instruments specified in this measure align with the Summit’s recommendations as well as CMS Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement legislation.

The Veterans RAND 12 item Health Survey (VR-12) is a generic patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument. It is a well validated and widely used in the hip and knee population to measure health related quality of life by capturing the patient’s physical function and health status. The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 assess patient-reported health status for physical, mental, and social well-being by measuring a patient’s pain, fatigue, physical function, depression/anxiety status, and social function. Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) are well validated and widely used instruments for measuring joint-specific pain and physical function before and after joint replacements. Full HOOS and KOOS surveys are lengthy, however, abbreviated versions are available as HOOS Jr./KOOS Jr.

To:

Elective total hip and knee replacement procedures seek to relieve pain and improve function, underscoring the importance of evaluating these outcomes pre and post surgery (Ayers, 2017). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized instruments that capture a patient’s perspective on their health status including symptoms, physical function, and quality of life.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has finalized policies to expand the collection and reporting of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for total hip and total knee arthroplasty across multiple programs (CMS, 2025, 2026a, 2026b, 2026c). This expansion reflects a national strategy to capture meaningful pre and postoperative PROMs to support clinical care, shared decision-making, and hospital-level quality assessment for elective total hip and knee replacement procedures (Ayers, 2017; CMS, 2021; Pasqualini et al., 2026).

Informed by the recommendations of the 2015 Patient Reported Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty (American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, 2015), this measure aims to advance postoperative PROM collection for total hip and knee arthroplasty procedures while accounting for the administrative burden associated with PRO data capture.

Selected References

Change from:

  • Cella, D., Hahn, E., Jensen, S., Butt, Z., Nowinski, C. et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Performance Measurement. Research Triangle Park (NC): RTI Press; 2015 Sep.
  • Patient Report Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty Report, August 31, 2015.

To:

THKR-OP-1 Rationale updated to reflect updated clinical practice guidelines and references Rationale

Change from:

Regional anesthesia is associated with fewer postoperative complications and deaths than general anesthesia. Research shows that patients who received neuraxial anesthesia had statistically significant decreases in 30-day mortality and in-hospital complications including pneumonia, kidney failure and the need for mechanical ventilation.1 Additional studies show decrease in operative blood loss and need for blood transfusions.2-3 Additionally, evidence supports the overall beneficial effects of neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia in decreasing the development of surgical site infections after total hip and knee arthroplasty.4 Several factors, such as compromised cardiopulmonary function, anticoagulative therapy, or anatomical deformity, may prevent general anesthesia and neuraxial blockade from being conducted in total joint replacement surgery.5 Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) can be used as the primary anesthetic for total knee replacement facilitating faster postoperative recovery than general anesthesia.6

In December, 2015, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) published Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Per the guidelines, evidence supports that neuraxial anesthesia could be used to improve select perioperative outcomes and complication rates compared to general anesthesia.7 In March, 2017, AAOS published Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. These guidelines state evidence supports the use of neuraxial anesthesia compared to general anesthesia to reduce complications in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.8 According to the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database, from 2005-2011, 52% of knee replacements and 60% of hip replacements were performed under general anesthesia.

Some surgeons avoid using regional anesthesia due to concerns that regional anesthesia may cause motor weakness, making patients more likely to fall when they are walking postoperatively. Peripheral nerve blockade did not alter the risk of inpatient fall, whereas use of neuraxial anesthesia reduced the risk by 30% compared with general anesthesia. The type of anesthesia may represent a modifiable risk factor and the use of neuraxial over general anesthesia may be considered in the context of a fall-prevention program.9

To:

Regional anesthesia for primary elective total hip arthroplasty is associated with lower rates of postoperative complications compared with general anesthesia. Specifically, regional anesthesia has been linked to decreased odds of adverse events, including prolonged ventilator dependence, unplanned intubation, and select postoperative complications such as urinary tract infection and pneumonia (Basques et al., 2015). Additional studies have also demonstrated lower rates of blood transfusion with regional compared to general anesthesia (Basques et al., 2015; Bourget-Murray et al., 2022; Illescas et al., 2025). The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline (2023) suggests that regional anesthesia may be used to reduce adverse events in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Further, the 2020 Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery concluded that both regional anesthesia and modern general anesthesia may be used as part of a multimodal anesthetic regimen (Wainwright et al., 2020). According to The American Joint Replacement Registry 2024 Annual Report, the use of general anesthesia alone for primary total hip arthroplasty has steadily decreased from 48.8% in 2017 to 36.4% in 2024 (AJRR, 2025). Similarly, the use of general anesthesia alone for total knee arthroplasty decreased from 40.6% in 2017 to 21.8% in 2024 (AJRR, 2025). This decline aligns with growing evidence supporting the benefits of regional anesthesia, such as spinal anesthesia and PNB combinations, which are associated with better postoperative outcomes, including reduced opioid use, quicker recovery times, and fewer complications (AJRR, 2024).

Selected References

Change from:

  • 1 Memtsoudis SG, Xuming S.; Ya-Lin Chiu, et al. Perioperative Comparative Effectiveness of Anesthetic Technique in Orthopedic Patients, Anesthesiology 05 2013, Vol.118, 1046-1058.
  • 2 Mauermann WJ, Shilling AM, Zuo Z. A comparison of neuraxial block versus general anesthesia for elective total hip replacement: a metaanalysis. Anesth. Analg. 2006; 103: 1018–25.
  • 3 Hu S, Zhang Z-Y, Hua Y-Q, Li J, Cai Z-D. A comparison of regional and general anaesthesia for total replacement of the hip or knee: a metaanalysis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2009; 91: 935–42.
  • 4 Zorrilla-Vaca A, Grant MC, Mathur V, Li J, Wu CL. The Impact of Neuraxial Versus General Anesthesia on the Incidence of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections Following Knee or Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine: September/October 2016 - Volume 41 - Issue 5 - p 555–563.
  • 5 Kim JH, Cho MR, et al. A comparison of femoral/sciatic nerve block with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block and combined spinal epidural anesthesia for total knee replacement arthroplasty. Korean J Anesthesiol 2012 May 62(5): 448-453.
  • 6 Liu JL, Yuan WX, et al. Peripheral nerve blocks versus general anesthesia for total knee replacement in elderly patients on the postoperative quality of recovery. Clinical Interventions in Aging 2014:9 341-350.
  • 7 Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. Adopted by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Board of Directors, 12/4/2015.
  • 8 Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. Adopted by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Board of Directors, 3.13.17.
  • 9 Memtsoudis SG, Thomas Danninger, Rehana Rasul, Jashvant Poeran, Philipp Gerner, Ottokar Stundner, Edward R. Mariano, Madhu Mazumdar. Inpatient Falls after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Anesthesiology, 2014; 120 (3): 551-563.
  • Nielsen PT, Jørgensen LN, Albrecht-Beste E, LeffersA, RasmussenLS. Lower thrombosis risk with epidural blockade in knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1990,61:1, 29-31
  • Mitchell D, Friedman, RJ, Baker DJ, Cooke JE, Darcy, MD, Miller MC. Prevention of thromboembolic disease following total knee arthroplasty: Epidural versus general anesthesia. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 1991; 269:109-112.
  • Jorgensen LN, Rasmussen LS, Nielsen PT, Leffers A, Albrecht-Beste E. Antithrombotic efficacy of continuous extradural analgesia after knee replacement. Br J Anaesth. 1991/1; 1: 8-12
  • Soohoo NF, Lieberman JR, et al. Development of Quality of Care Indicators for Patients Undergoing THR/TKR. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:153-157
  • Basques BA, Toy JO, Bohl, DD, Golinvaux, NS, Grauer, JN. General Compared with Spinal Anesthesia for Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2015;97:455-61
  • Hunt LP, Ben-Shlomo Y, Clark EM, Dieppe P, Judge A, MacGregor AJ, Tobias JH, Vernon K, Blom AW. 90 day mortality after 409,096 total hip replacements for osteoarthritis, from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales: a retrospective analysis, Lancet. 2013 Sep 28;382(9898):1097-104
  • Premier-IHI Integrated Care Pathway for Total Joint Arthroplasty (April 2013)
  • Williams-Russo P, Sharrock NE, Haas SB, et al. Randomized Trial of Epidural Versus General Anesthesia: Outcomes After Primary Total Knee Replacement. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 331:199-208, October, 1996.
  • National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database
  • FORCE-Total Joint Registry database
  • Warren, F., Sundaram, A., Anis, A., Kamath, S., Mont, S., Higuera, S., & Piuzzi, S. (2020). Spinal Anesthesia Is Associated With Decreased Complications After Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 28(5), e213–e221.

To:

THKR-OP-2 Rationale updated to reflect updated clinical practice guidelines and references Rationale

Change from:

Early ambulation as close to the time of surgery as possible can reduce the risk of complications associated with bed rest such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, atelectasis, pneumonia and urinary retention. Additionally, early ambulation results in a decreased length of stay, lowering the patient’s risk for hospital acquired infections and other complications. Early ambulation leads to improvement in outcomes (range of motion, gait, balance, muscle strength and pain) without an increase in adverse events.1 Studies demonstrating positive results showed that rapid ambulation can be achieved as early as in the PACU.2

To:

Early postoperative mobilization is a core component of high-quality care for total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery. The 2020 Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society consensus statement on perioperative care for total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery recommends that patients be mobilized as early as they are able to support functional recovery and facilitate early achievement of discharge criteria (Wainwright et al., 2020). Early mobilization is also recommended to mitigate adverse physiologic effects of postoperative immobility and bed rest, including insulin resistance, muscle atrophy, venous thromboembolism, and postoperative pulmonary complications (Wainwright et al., 2020; Alsuwaylihi et al., 2026).

Evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of early mobilization following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Mobilization within the first 24 hours after surgery is associated with a reduction in hospital length of stay without an increase in the rate of in hospital postoperative adverse events (Guerra et al., 2015). Additionally, evidence from a large multicenter study demonstrates that early mobilization is independently associated with a significant reduction in postoperative complications occurring within 30 days following total hip and knee arthroplasty (Ripollés-Melchor et al., 2020).

Based on recommendations from a Technical Advisory Panel and public comment, this measure was refined to focus on early postoperative ambulation as a more clinically meaningful indicator of mobilization.

Selected References

Change from:

  • 1Guerra ML, Singh PJ, Taylor NF. Early mobilization of patients who have had a hip or knee joint replacement reduces length of stay in hospital: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2014 Dec 1.
  • 2Tayrose G, Newman D, Slover J, Jaffe F, Hunter T, Bosco J. Rapid Mobilization Decreases Length of Stay in Joint Replacement Patients. Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases 2013;71(3):222-6.
  • AAOS Guidelines on Preventing Venous Thromboembolic Disease in Patients Undergoing Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty”, AAOS.
  • Premier-IHI Integrated Care Pathway for Total Joint Arthroplasty (April 2013)
  • Soohoo NF, Lieberman JR, et al. Development of Quality of Care Indicators for Patients Undergoing THR/TKR. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:153-157
  • Larsen K, Sorensen, O, Hansen T, Thomsen P, Soballe K. Accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention for hip and knee replacement is effective: A randomized clinical trial involving 87 patients with 3 months of followup. Acta Orthopaedica 79:2, 149-159.
  • den Hertog A, Gliesche K, Timm J, Mühlbauer B, Zebrowski. Pathway-controlled fast-track rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective clinical study evaluating the recovery pattern, drug consumption, and length of stay. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Aug; 132(8):1153-63.
  • Smith TO, McCabe C, Lister Set al Rehabilitation implications during the development of the Norwich Enhanced Recovery Programme (NERP) for patients following total knee and total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98: 499–505.
  • Raut S, Mertes SC, Muniz-Terrera G, Khanduja V. Factors associated with prolonged length of stay following a total knee replacement in patients aged over 75. Int Orthop 2012; 36: 1,601–1,608.
  • Raphael M, Jaeger M, van Vlymen J. Easily adoptable total joint arthroplasty program allows discharge home in two days. Can J Anaesth 2011; 58: 902–910
  • Pua YH, Ong PH. Association of early ambulation with length of stay and costs in total knee arthroplasty: retrospective cohort study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 93:962-970.
  • Chen AF, Stewart MK, Heyl AE, Klatt BA. Effect of Immediate Postoperative Physical Therapy on Length of Stay for Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2012;Vol.27 No. 6
  • Wellman SS, Murphy AC, Gulcynski D, Murphy SB. Implementation of an accelerated mobilization protocol following primary total hip arthroplasty: impact on length of stay and disposition. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Volume 4(3); 2011 Sep
  • Renkawitz T, Rieder T, Handel M. Comparison of two accelerated clinical pathways – after total knee replacement how fast can we really go? Clinical Rehabilitation 2010; 24:230-239
  • Labraca,NS, Castro-Sanchez,AM, Mataran-Penarrocha,G, Arroyo-Morales,M, Sanchez-Joya,M, Moreno-Lorenzo C. Benefits of starting rehabilitation within 24 hours of primary total knee arthroplasty: randomized clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2011/25(6):557-566
  • Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. Adopted by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Board of Directors, 12/4/2015.

To:

  • Alsuwaylihi, A., O'Connor, D., Joshi, G. P., Kehlet, H., and Lobo, D. N. (2026). Importance of early postoperative mobilization: Comprehensive review. BJS Open, 10 (2), zrag016. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrag016
  • Guerra, M. L., Singh, P. J., and Taylor, N. F. (2015). Early mobilization of patients who have had a hip or knee joint replacement reduces length of stay in hospital: A systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation, 29 (9), 844–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514558641
  • Ripollés-Melchor, J., Abad-Motos, A., Díez-Remesal, Y., Aseguinolaza-Pagola, M., Padin-Barreiro, L., Sánchez-Martín, R., Logroño-Egea, M., García-Orallo, S., Ramirez-Rodriguez, J. M., and POWER2 Study Investigators Group. (2020). Association Between Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Postoperative Complications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the Postoperative Outcomes Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Elective Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Study (POWER2). JAMA Surgery, 155 (4), e196024. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6024
  • Wainwright, T. W., Gill, M., McDonald, D. A., Middleton, R. G., Reed, M., Sahota, O., Yates, P., & Ljungqvist, O. (2020). Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Acta Orthopaedica, 91 (1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1683790
THKR-OP-3 Rationale updated to reflect updated clinical practice guidelines and references Rationale

Change from:

Home-based rehabilitation is increasingly utilized to reduce health-care costs; however, with a shorter hospital stay, the possibility arises for an increase in adverse clinical outcomes. Research has shown that despite concerns about early hospital discharge, there is no difference in pain, functional outcomes, or patient satisfaction between groups that received home-based rehabilitation versus inpatient rehabilitation. Home-based rehabilitation protocol following elective primary total hip or knee replacement is the more cost-effective strategy.1-2

According to 2012 Medicare claims data, 49% of patients undergoing hip and knee replacements were discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) or skilled nursing facility (SNF) for rehabilitation. Therefore, only 51% of patients were discharged to home.

To:

High-quality care for total hip and total knee replacement procedures is designed to promote early functional recovery and enable safe discharge to the patient’s home. The 2020 Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society consensus statement on perioperative care for total hip and knee replacement recommends the use of objective discharge criteria to facilitate direct discharge to home (Wainwright et al., 2020).

Home-based rehabilitation is increasingly used following total hip and knee replacement procedures. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) 2022 Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Evidence Based Clinical Practice Guideline reports that discharge to home, with or without home services, is associated with fewer adverse events compared to discharge to an acute rehabilitation facility or skilled nursing facility (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2022). Additionally, the 2023 Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip Evidence Based Clinical Practice Guideline reports high-quality evidence supporting either formal physical therapy or unsupervised home exercise following total hip arthroplasty (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2023).

Analyses of large national datasets indicate that rates of discharge to home following total hip and knee arthroplasty have notably increased over the past decade (American Joint Replacement Registry, 2025; DeMik et al., 2021), although meaningful variation in discharge practices persist (DeMik et al., 2021).

Selected References

Change from:

  • 1Mahomed NN, Davis AM, Hawker G, Badley E, Davey JR, Syed KA. et al. Inpatient compared with home-based rehabilitation following primary unilateral total hip or knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(8):1673–1680.
  • 2Padgett DE, et al. Study: Patients Who Go Home After Knee Replacement Do As Well as Those Discharged to Rehab Facility. Presented at: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting; March 24-28, 2015; Las Vegas.
  • Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Services: Assessing payment adequacy and updating payments - Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy March 2014
  • Mallinson TR, Bateman J, Tseng HY, Manheim L, et al. A Comparison of Discharge Functional Status After Rehabilitation in Skilled Nursing, Home Health, and Medical Rehabilitation Settings for Patients After Lower-Extremity Joint Replacement Surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil Vol 92, May 2011.
  • Fleischman A, Austin, M, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J, Hozack WJ, The Rothman Institute Study: Even if you live alone, there is no place like home after total joint arthroplasty. Presented at American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting; March 14, 2017; San Diego, CA.
  • McLawhorn AS, Fu, MC, Schairer WW, Sculco PK, MacLeanCH,Padgett DE. Continued Inpatient Care After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Increases 30-Day Post-Discharge Complications: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis. The Journal of Arthroplasty. January 31, 2017 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.039).
  • Ramos NL, Karia RJ, Hutzler LH, Brandt AM, Slover JD, Bosco JA. The effect of discharge disposition on 30-day readmission rates after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Apr;29(4):674-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

To:

THKR-OP-4 Description and Rationale updated to reflect updated clinical practice guidelines and references Description

Change from:

Patients who completed the general health and joint specific functional status assessments within 90 days prior to surgery as specified below:

Hips: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] AND [HOOS Jr. (6 questions) or HOOS Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (27 questions)]

Knees: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] AND [KOOS Jr. (7 questions) or KOOS Stiffness, Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (28 questions)]

The assessment tool must reflect the status of the patient’s health condition, health behavior, or experience with health care from the patient’s perspective, without interpretation of the patient’s response by a clinician or anyone else 1. The assessment can be completed by phone, mail, email, or in-person.

To:

Patients who completed the general health and joint specific functional status assessments within 90 days prior to surgery as specified below:

Hips: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] AND [HOOS Jr. (6 questions) or HOOS Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (27 questions)]

Knees: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] AND [KOOS Jr. (7 questions) or KOOS Stiffness, Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (28 questions)]

The assessment tool must reflect the status of the patient’s health condition, health behavior, or experience with health care from the patient’s perspective, without interpretation of the patient’s response by a clinician or anyone else. The assessment can be completed by phone, mail, email, or in-person.

Rationale

Change from:

Good orthopedic care requires knowledge of the patient’s history of musculoskeletal pain and associated limitations in daily function. Standardized measures of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can provide this information. Integrating PROs into routine orthopedic patient visits can provide key information to monitor changes in symptom severity over time, support shared clinical care decisions, and assess treatment effectiveness.2

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) capture patients’ self-assessments of their health and provide a mechanism for evaluating the effectiveness of patient-centered care.3 In acknowledgement of the administrative burden associated with PRO data capture, The Joint Commission will implement PROMs in a phased approach. During this first phase, the process of collecting preoperative data will be measured. During the second phase, pre- and postoperative data will be evaluated with the goal of calculating patients’ improvement scores. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons are very supportive of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ effort to develop patient-reported functional status outcome measures for total hip and knee arthroplasty. When fully specified and risk-adjusted, these measures will be useful in assessing quality and value of care and will permit performance measurement progression beyond process measures.4-5

On August 31, 2015, the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) convened a Patient Reported Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty in Baltimore, Maryland. Representatives from orthopaedic organizations (AAHKS, AAOS, The Hip Society, The Knee Society, and American Joint Replacement Registry), CMS, YNHHSC/CORE, National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), Mathematica, CECity, and Blue Cross Blue Shield Association participated in the Summit. The Summit’s goal was to obtain a consensus regarding the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and risk variables suitable for total hip and knee arthroplasty performance measures.6 The instruments specified in this measure, align with the Summit’s recommendations as well as CMS Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) legislation.

The Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) is a generic patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument used to measure health related quality of life. This tool, which measures physical function and health status, is widely used and is well validated in the total hip and total knee population. Additionally, the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 instrument, funded by the National Institute of Health, is increasingly used in the United States. PROMIS instruments use modern measurement theory to assess patient–reported health status for physical, mental, and social well–being to reliably and validly measure patient reported outcomes (PROs) for clinical research and practice. PROMIS instruments measure concepts such as pain, fatigue, physical function, depression, anxiety and social function. Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) are well validated and widely used instruments for measuring joint-specific pain and physical function before and after joint replacement. While the full HOOS and KOOS surveys are lengthy, the orthopedic community prefers an abbreviated survey that captures a subset of items referred to as HOOS JR/KOOS JR.

To:

Elective total hip and knee replacement procedures seek to relieve pain and improve function, underscoring the importance of evaluating these outcomes pre and post surgery (Ayers, 2017). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized instruments that capture a patient’s perspective on their health status including symptoms, physical function, and quality of life.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has finalized policies to expand the collection and reporting of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for total hip and total knee arthroplasty across multiple programs (CMS, 2025a, 2026a, 2026b, 2026c). This expansion reflects a national strategy to capture meaningful pre and postoperative PROMs to support clinical care, shared decision-making, and hospital-level quality assessment for elective total hip and knee replacement procedures (Ayers, 2017; CMS, 2025b; Pasqualini et al., 2026).

Informed by the recommendations of the 2015 Patient Reported Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty (American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, 2015), this measure aims to advance preoperative PROM collection for total hip and knee arthroplasty procedures while accounting for the administrative burden associated with PRO data capture.

Selected References

Change from:

  • 1 Cella D, Hahn EA, Jensen SE, Patient-Reported Outcomes in Performance Measurement, ©2015 Research Triangle Institute.
  • 2 Ayers DC, Zheng H, Franklin PD. Integrating Patient-reported Outcomes Into Orthopaedic Clinical Practice: Proof of Concept From FORCE-TJR. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2013;471(11):3419-3425. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3143-z.
  • 3 Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Elective Primary Total Hip and/or Total Knee Arthroplasty: Hospital-Level Performance Measure(s), Phase 3 Measure Methodology Report, Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation – Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), May 2015.
  • 4 AAOS letter to Andy Slavitt, Acting Administrator/CMS dated April 3, 2015. Re.: Response during public comment on “Proposed Electronic Clinical Quality Measures for Functional Status Assessment and Improvement for Patients who received a Total Hip Replacement and Functional Status Assessment and Improvement for Patients who received a Total Knee Replacement.”
  • 5 AAHKS letter to Andy Slavitt, Acting Administrator/CMS dated March 30, 2015. Re.: Response during public comment on “Proposed Electronic Clinical Quality Measures for Functional Status Assessment and Improvement for Patients who received a Total Hip Replacement and Functional Status Assessment and Improvement for Patients who received a Total Knee Replacement.”

  • 6 Patient Reported Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty Report, August 31, 2015.
  • AAHKS sponsored Patient Reported Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty Report. August 31, 2015.
  • FORCE-TJR letter to CMS dated September 3, 2015. Response during public comment on CMS-5516-Proposal for Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Payment Model for Acute Care Hospitals Furnishing Lower Extremity Joint Replacement Services.
  • AAHKS, AAOS, AJRR letter to Andy Slavitt, Acting Administrator/CMS dated September 8, 2015. Response during public comment on CMS-5516-Proposal for Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Payment Model for Acute Care Hospitals Furnishing Lower Extremity Joint Replacement Services.
  • AAHKS letter to Andy Slavitt, Acting Administrator/CMS dated September 8, 2015. Response during public comment on CMS-5516-Proposal for Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Payment Model for Acute Care Hospitals Furnishing Lower Extremity Joint Replacement Services.

To:

THKR-OP-5 Description and Rationale updated to reflect updated clinical practice guidelines and references Description

Change from:

Patients who completed the general health and joint specific functional status assessments, at 1 year (300-425 days) after surgery, as specified below:

Hips: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] AND [HOOS Jr. (6 questions) or HOOS Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (27 questions)]

Knees: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] and [KOOS Jr. (7 questions) or KOOS Stiffness, Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (28 questions)]

The assessment tool must reflect the status of the patient’s health condition, health behavior, or experience with health care from the patient’s perspective, without interpretation of the patient’s response by a clinician or anyone else (Cella et al. 2015). The assessment can be completed by phone, mail, email, or in-person.

To:

Patients who completed the general health and joint specific functional status assessments, at 1 year (300-425 days) after surgery, as specified below:

Hips: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] AND [HOOS Jr. (6 questions) or HOOS Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (27 questions)]

Knees: [VR-12 or PROMIS-Global] and {KOOS Jr. (7 questions) or KOOS Stiffness, Pain, Function Daily Living Subscales (28 questions)]

The assessment tool must reflect the status of the patient’s health condition, health behavior, or experience with health care from the patient’s perspective, without interpretation of the patient’s response by a clinician or anyone else. The assessment can be completed by phone, mail, email, or in-person.

Rationale

Change from:

Good orthopedic care requires knowledge of the patient’s history of musculoskeletal pain and associated limitations in daily function, along with improvements or declines seen after surgery. Standardized measures of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can provide this information.

The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) convened a Patient Reported Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty in 2015 with the goal of obtaining consensus regarding the patient-reported outcomes and risk variables suitable for total hip and total knee arthroplasty performance measures (Patient Reported Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty Report, 2015). The instruments specified in this measure align with the Summit’s recommendations as well as CMS Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement legislation.

The Veterans RAND 12 item Health Survey (VR-12) is a generic patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument. It is a well validated and widely used in the hip and knee population to measure health related quality of life by capturing the patient’s physical function and health status. The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 assess patient-reported health status for physical, mental, and social well-being by measuring a patient’s pain, fatigue, physical function, depression/anxiety status, and social function. Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) are well validated and widely used instruments for measuring joint-specific pain and physical function before and after joint replacements. Full HOOS and KOOS surveys are lengthy, however, abbreviated versions are available as HOOS Jr./KOOS Jr.

To:

Elective total hip and knee replacement procedures seek to relieve pain and improve function, underscoring the importance of evaluating these outcomes pre and post surgery (Ayers, 2017). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized instruments that capture a patient’s perspective on their health status including symptoms, physical function, and quality of life.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has finalized policies to expand the collection and reporting of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for total hip and total knee arthroplasty across multiple programs (CMS, 2025a, 2026a, 2026b, 2026c). This expansion reflects a national strategy to capture meaningful pre and postoperative PROMs to support clinical care, shared decision-making, and hospital-level quality assessment for elective total hip and knee replacement procedures (Ayers, 2017; CMS, 2025b; Pasqualini et al., 2026).

Informed by the recommendations of the 2015 Patient Reported Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty (American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, 2015), this measure aims to advance postoperative PROM collection for total hip and knee arthroplasty procedures while accounting for the administrative burden associated with PRO data capture.

Selected References

Change from:

  • Cella, D., Hahn, E., Jensen, S., Butt, Z., Nowinski, C. et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Performance Measurement. Research Triangle Park (NC): RTI Press; 2015 Sep.
  • Patient Report Outcomes Summit for Total Joint Arthroplasty Report, August 31, 2015.

To:

Data Elements

SectionRationaleDescription
Alcohol Use Status Clarification added to notes for abstraction based on frequently asked questions Notes for Abstraction

Change from:

Documentation of cognitive impairment overrides documentation of an alcohol use screen and therefore would not be considered "conflicting documentation." Even if the family or others tell staff the patient uses alcohol, the patient could not be appropriately screened and subsequently counseled due to cognitive impairment. Select Value “7.”

To:

Documentation of cognitive impairment overrides documentation of an alcohol use screen or BAC 0.08 g/dL or greater and therefore would not be considered "conflicting documentation." Even if the family or others tell staff the patient uses alcohol, the patient could not be appropriately screened and subsequently counseled due to cognitive impairment. Select Value “7.”

Discharge Disposition Updated example for accuracy. Change from:

Examples:

Discharge summary dictated 2 days after discharge states patient went “home”. Physician note on day of discharge further clarifies that the patient will be going home with hospice”. Select value “2” (“Hospice - Home”).

To:

Examples:

Discharge summary dictated day before discharge states patient went “home”. Physician note on day of discharge further clarifies that the patient will be going home with hospice”. Select value “2” (“Hospice - Home”).
Event Type Clarification added to notes for abstraction based on frequently asked questions. Notes for Abstraction

Change from:

A physical restraint is any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a patient to move his or her arms, legs, body or head freely when it is used as a restriction to manage a patient's behavior or restrict the patient's freedom of movement and is not a standard treatment for the patient's medical or psychiatric condition.

To:

A physical restraint is any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a patient to move his or her arms, legs, body or head freely when it is used as a restriction to manage a patient's behavior or restrict the patient's freedom of movement.
IA Alteplase or MER Initiation Time The data element definition was updated to add another acceptable term for inclusion. Inclusion Guidelines for Abstraction

Add:
  • Crossed lesion time
Minutes of Physical Restraint Clarification added to inclusion and exclusion based on frequently asked questions. Inclusion

Change from:

A physical restraint is any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a patient to move his or her arms, legs, body or head freely when it is used as a restriction to manage a patient's behavior or restrict the patient's freedom of movement and is not a standard treatment for the patient's medical or psychiatric condition.

To:

A physical restraint is any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a patient to move his or her arms, legs, body or head freely when it is used as a restriction to manage a patient's behavior or restrict the patient's freedom of movement.

Change from:

Manual holds

To:

Manual (physical) holds

Remove:

Stapling

Remove:

Jarvis

Change from:

Leather restraints

To:

Leather/locking restraints

Add:

Exclusion

Change from:

Devices such as orthopedically prescribed devices, surgical dressings or bandages, protective helmets

To:

Devices such as orthopedically prescribed devices, surgical dressings or bandages, protective helmets, IV arm board, positioning or securing devices during procedures or anesthesia

Change from:

Methods that involve the physical holding of a patient to conduct routine physical examinations, tests, or medication administration

To:

Methods that involve the physical holding of a patient to conduct routine physical examinations or tests to which the patient has consented

Change from:

Restraint uses that are forensic or correctional restrictions applied and used by outside law enforcement

To:

Restraint uses that are correctional restrictions applied and used by outside law enforcement

Change from:

Restraint uses that are forensic or correctional restrictions applied and used by designated hospital security personnel to transport the patient to court off the locked unit

To:

Restraint uses that are correctional restrictions applied and used by designated hospital security personnel to transport the patient to court off the locked unit

Reason for Not Prescribing Anticoagulation Therapy at Discharge The data element was updated to provide clarification for abstractors. Notes for Abstraction
Change second bullet from:

  • If reasons are not mentioned in the context of anticoagulation therapy, do not make inferences (e.g., do not assume that anticoagulation therapy was not prescribed because of a bleeding disorder unless documentation explicitly states so).
    • Reasons must be explicitly documented (e.g., “Active GI bleed – anticoagulation therapy contraindicated,” “No warfarin” [no reason given]).
    • Consider the term "blood thinners" synonymous with anticoagulant therapy. Physician/APN/PA or pharmacist documentation, e.g., "no blood thinners", select "Yes".

To:
  • If reasons are not mentioned in the context of anticoagulation therapy, do not make inferences (e.g., do not assume that anticoagulation therapy was not prescribed because of a bleeding disorder unless documentation explicitly states so).
    • Reasons must be explicitly documented (e.g., “Active GI bleed – anticoagulation therapy contraindicated,” “No warfarin” [no reason given]).
    • Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion or closure device without mention of anticoagulation is not an acceptable reason.
      Examples:
      "X device 20XX," select "No".
      "Patient with H/O AF, S/P X device, no longer on anticoagulation," select "Yes".
    • Consider the term "blood thinners" synonymous with anticoagulant therapy. Physician/APN/PA or pharmacist documentation, e.g., "no blood thinners", select "Yes".
Regional Anesthesia Bolded to increase awareness to important note for abstraction. Notes for Abstraction

Change from:
  • If regional anesthesia was performed/attempted in combination with a modality listed in the Exclusion Guidelines, select “1” or "2" as appropriate.

To:
  • If regional anesthesia was performed/attempted in combination with a modality listed in the Exclusion Guidelines, select “1” or "2" as appropriate.
Skin Puncture Time The data element definition was revised to add exclusion terms that should not be used for abstraction. Exclusion Guidelines for Abstraction
Add:
  • Anesthesia start time
  • Procedure start time
  • Terms other than time of arterial access / puncture

Supplemental Materials

SectionRationaleDescription
Appendix A - Code Tables Removal of tables due to the associated measures being removed from the manual. Remove Table 10.01 and 10.02 from Appendix A.
Appendix C - Medication Tables Remove SR from Bupropion and Wellbutrin from table 9.1 due to active ingredients of medication is FDA approved. Remove Butrans and Balbuca from table 9.2 active ingredient is already maintained on the list. Update Table 9.1 to remove SR from wellbutrin and Bupropion. Update Table 9.2 to remove Butrans and Balbuca since active ingredient is already maintained on the current list.
Appendix D - Appendix D - Glossary of Terms A definition for "encounters" from the CMS Data Navigator Glossary of Terms was added to the glossary section of the manual. Appendix D
General Glossary of Terms
Add:
encounters Encounters (or visits) are documented face-to-face contact between a beneficiary and provider.
Appendix H - Appendix H - Miscellaneous Tables VTE measures are retired and Table 2.1 now used for STK-1 VTE Prophylaxis only. Graduated compression stockings alone without another form of prophylaxis are not acceptable for stroke patients. Appendix H, Table 2.1 VTE Prophylaxis Inclusion Table

Remove:

Graduated Compression Stockings (GCS)
-Knee or Thigh High |Anti-Embolism stockings
Anti-thrombosis stockings
Elastic support hose
Graduated compression elastic stockings
Surgical hose
White hose
Thrombosis stockings |
Global Initial Patient Population - Global Initial Patient Population Global Initial Patient Population was updated to reflect the removal of retired measures ED-1 and ED-2. The note was updated to reflect the continued maintenance and availability of the IMM, SUB and TOB measure sets. Remove all references to ED.

Note

Change from:

Note: The ED, IMM, SUB, and TOB measure sets are being retired as of January 1, 2026. These measure sets are removed from ORYX. Measures will be maintained through 2026 discharges.

To:

Note: The IMM, SUB, and TOB measure sets are retired from ORYX reporting as of January 1, 2026. These measure sets will be maintained and available in the Specifications Manual for Joint Commission National Quality Measures until further notice.
Joint Commission National Quality Measures Data Processing - Transmission of Data The Joint Commission National Quality Measures Data Processing Section was updated to provide clarification about outpatient measure data reporting. Overview
Add fourth paragraph:
Certification measure data are to be submitted at the site-level. Health systems with more than one hospital site certified for the same or different stroke certification program and sharing a medical record are expected to submit data specific for that hospital site.

STK and ASR Data Sections
Change from:

STK data section

Starting from 1Q2019 discharged data, STK patient can be inpatient or outpatient.
  • STK inpatient measures (STK-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 08 and 10)
  • STK outpatient measure (STK-OP-1)
  • A patient cannot be an inpatient and outpatient at the same time, therefore the same patient cannot be counted in both the inpatient and outpatient STK measures.

ASR data section

Starting from 3Q2021 discharged data, ASR patient can be inpatient or outpatient.

  • ASR inpatient measures (ASR-IP-1, 2 and 3)
  • ASR outpatient measure (ASR-OP-1)
  • STK Outpatient measure (STK-OP-1)
  • A patient cannot be an inpatient and outpatient at the same time, therefore the same patient cannot be counted in both the inpatient and outpatient ASR measures.

To:

STK data section

Starting from 1Q2019 discharged data, STK patient can be inpatient or outpatient.
  • STK inpatient measures (STK-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 08 and 10)
  • STK outpatient measure (STK-OP-1)
  • A patient cannot be an inpatient and outpatient at the same time at your hospital, therefore the same patient record cannot be counted in both the inpatient and outpatient STK measure data reported by your site. If the patient is transferred from your hospital ED to another acute care hospital outside of or within your health system, include the case in the count of records reviewed for STK-OP-1. If the patient is admitted to your hospital for inpatient care, count the record in all required STK measures and CSTK-01.

ASR data section

Starting from 3Q2021 discharged data, ASR patient can be inpatient or outpatient.
  • ASR inpatient measures (ASR-IP-1, 2 and 3)
  • ASR outpatient measure (ASR-OP-1)
  • STK Outpatient measure (STK-OP-1)
  • A patient cannot be an inpatient and outpatient at the same time at your hospital, therefore the same patient record cannot be counted in both the inpatient and outpatient ASR measure data reported by your site. If the patient is transferred from your hospital ED to another acute care hospital outside of or within your health system, include the case in the count of records reviewed for ASR-OP-1 and STK-OP-1. If the patient is admitted to your hospital for inpatient care, count the record in the three ASR-IP measures.

Sampling Chapter - Sampling The Population and Sampling Specifications page was revised to remove all references to the retired ED measure. References to submitting data to the Joint Commission were also removed from the narrative and algorithm where applicable. Remove all references to the retired ED measure and submitting data to the Joint Commission where applicable.

General Release Notes

RationaleDescription
Joint Commission updated their name from The Joint Commission to Joint Commission. The word The was removed from The Joint Commission where applicable.
ED-1 and ED-2 were retired from ORYX. ED-1 and ED-2 were removed from this manual, 2027A.
Multiple tables were updated to include the 2027 ICD-10 updates. Table 11.07,11.30,11.09, 11.43 were updated to align with the 2027 ICD-10 updates. The revisions include additions, deletions, and revisions to descriptions.

Release Notes
CPT® only copyright 2026 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Specifications Manual for Joint Commission National Quality Measures (v2027A)
Discharges 01-01-2027 (1Q27) through 06-30-2027 (2Q27)

LICENSE FOR USE OF CURRENT PROCEDURAL TERMINOLOGY, FOURTH EDITION (“CPT®”)

CPT® only copyright 2026 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. CPT® is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association.

You, your employees and agents are authorized to use CPT® only as contained in The Joint Commission performance measures solely for your own personal use in directly participating in healthcare programs administered by The Joint Commission. You acknowledge that the American Medical Association (“AMA”) holds all copyright, trademark and other rights in CPT®.

Any use not authorized herein is prohibited, including by way of illustration and not by way of limitation, making copies of CPT® for resale and/or license, transferring copies of CPT® to any party not bound by this Agreement, creating any modified or derivative work of CPT®, or making any commercial use of CPT®. License to use CPT® for any use not authorized herein must be obtained through the American Medical Association, Intellectual Property Services, AMA Plaza, 330 North Wabash Avenue, Suite 39300, Chicago, Illinois 60611-5885. Applications are available at the American Medical Association Web site, www.ama- assn.org/go/cpt.

U.S. Government Rights This product includes CPT® which is commercial technical data, which was developed exclusively at private expense by the American Medical Association, 330 North Wabash Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60611. The American Medical Association does not agree to license CPT® to the Federal Government based on the license in FAR 52.227-14 (Data Rights - General) and DFARS 252.227-7015 (Technical Data - Commercial Items) or any other license provision. The American Medical Association reserves all rights to approve any license with any Federal agency.

Disclaimer of Warranties and Liabilities. CPT® is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Fee schedules, relative value units, conversion factors and/or related components are not assigned by the AMA, are not part of CPT®, and the (AMA is not recommending their use. The AMA does not directly or indirectly practice medicine or dispense medical services. The responsibility for the content of this product is with The Joint Commission, and no endorsement by the AMA is intended or implied. The AMA disclaims responsibility for any consequences or liability attributable to or related to any use, non-use, or interpretation of information contained or not contained in this product.

This Agreement will terminate upon notice if you violate its terms. The AMA is a third party beneficiary to this Agreement.

Should the foregoing terms and conditions be acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement and acceptance by clicking below on the button labeled “accept”.

^